Search

Notices
Your Photos and Videos Share your best

Freight Dawgs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-03-2008, 07:33 AM
  #1  
With The Resistance
Thread Starter
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default Freight Dawgs

jungle is offline  
Old 08-03-2008, 07:49 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 191
Default

yeah buddy
LucasM is offline  
Old 08-04-2008, 03:42 AM
  #3  
Moderator
 
usmc-sgt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,971
Default

There is a good chance one of our members is in that DC-6
usmc-sgt is offline  
Old 08-04-2008, 03:54 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
stinsonjr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 919
Default

They would not fly the DC-6 if it were not profitable, but I am curious about the money making aspects of the plane. How much cargo can it carry? What airplanes would be comparable, and why is the DC-6 a better choice? Just curious - we all obviously love the 6 and I am amazed and happy they can still work her profitably.
stinsonjr is offline  
Old 08-04-2008, 09:59 AM
  #5  
With The Resistance
Thread Starter
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Originally Posted by stinsonjr
They would not fly the DC-6 if it were not profitable, but I am curious about the money making aspects of the plane. How much cargo can it carry? What airplanes would be comparable, and why is the DC-6 a better choice? Just curious - we all obviously love the 6 and I am amazed and happy they can still work her profitably.
The DC-6 variants are operated by at least two companies in Alaska and they seem to stay busy. I am sure FlyorDie will have more salient input, but this aircraft seems to have a good combination of low cost, lots of load, plenty of parts in the market and the ability to operate from rough strips.
The unique geography of the area and it's inhabitants requires quite an airbridge due to no roads and long distances. Almost everything used by people or companies operating in this huge empty area must move by air.
jungle is offline  
Old 08-04-2008, 06:31 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlyOrDie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB120 Left
Posts: 629
Default

Well my window is open So it might be me. What day did you take this?
FlyOrDie is offline  
Old 08-04-2008, 06:47 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlyOrDie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB120 Left
Posts: 629
Default

Originally Posted by stinsonjr
They would not fly the DC-6 if it were not profitable, but I am curious about the money making aspects of the plane. How much cargo can it carry? What airplanes would be comparable, and why is the DC-6 a better choice? Just curious - we all obviously love the 6 and I am amazed and happy they can still work her profitably.
Most of our a/c are can carry 30,000lbs of payload. Usually the limiting factor on how much weight we can carry is the zero fuel weight limit of 87,360lbs. None of our aircraft have auto feather installed anymore so we're limited to 100,000lbs max takeoff weight which isn't a problem because we don't fly the airplane that far in our operations.

There aren't really any other airplanes that can carry 30,000lbs into a 4000 foot gravel strip other than C130s or other military aircraft which cost multi millions. The DC6 is perfect for Alaska because of all the gravel runways we operate on and the outsize loads like vehicles and equipment we haul. Ford Explorer size SUVs can fit on most our airplanes nicely.

We burn 500 gallons the first hour of flight and 400 gallons an hour thereafter. A 737-200 burns twice that going twice as fast.

In 2 weeks I'll have time off so I can catch up on posting some more freight dawg pictures. Meanwhile I'm flying 30+ hours a week which is nice for the checkbook
FlyOrDie is offline  
Old 08-05-2008, 06:13 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
stinsonjr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 919
Default

How many do you have, and how hard is it to maintain them? I am happy that they are still working hard! What happens when the 6's need to be replaced? C130's? How long can they keep flying?
stinsonjr is offline  
Old 08-06-2008, 07:00 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlyOrDie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB120 Left
Posts: 629
Default

Originally Posted by Cliffy170
Is this an Everts DC-6?
And, does it carry fuel to villages? or is that just the C-36's?
Yes and this one is carrying cargo, the fuel DC6s say Airfuel on the side.
FlyOrDie is offline  
Old 08-08-2008, 10:58 PM
  #10  
With The Resistance
Thread Starter
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Cliffy, just quit bragging about your fighter time (most of us have that) and give the freight dawgs the respect they deserve. Doors will open.
Maybe I'm just getting old, but I think on the Cajones meter it takes the same reading to climb into this as an F-16.


Last edited by jungle; 08-08-2008 at 11:07 PM.
jungle is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices