Munoz comes out against borders.
02-09-2017, 05:08 PM
#81
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 653
According to the Donald, Christians can move to the front of the line.
Trump says US will prioritize Christian refugees - CNNPolitics.com
Three cheers for a strong Constitution to protect us... from the executive branch.
Trump says US will prioritize Christian refugees - CNNPolitics.com
Three cheers for a strong Constitution to protect us... from the executive branch.
Christians have been slaughtered and ignored by the world long enough.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rt.com/document/58654ef1c461885a5c8b4580/amp
02-09-2017, 05:39 PM
#82
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 695
Ok rock star. I guess we'll see how the courts continue to view it. Also, if you think identifying countries of concern equates to this current specific executive order, then I'm sure you have a great time with all sorts of nuance in life.
02-09-2017, 06:01 PM
#83
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Capt
Posts: 3,215
I read that maybe by the time this gets to the SC, the Reps may have put in place the new SCOTUS nominee, and then the matter can be ruled on with 9 Justices...
02-09-2017, 06:03 PM
#84
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 320 Captain
Posts: 655
I guess it'll balance things out for a bit.
Christians have been slaughtered and ignored by the world long enough.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rt....5a5c8b4580/amp
Christians have been slaughtered and ignored by the world long enough.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rt....5a5c8b4580/amp
02-09-2017, 06:07 PM
#85
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 320 Captain
Posts: 655
The Supreme Court can't properly judge anything now, because they only have 8 members. If they rule in a tie, then the lower court decision holds.
I read that maybe by the time this gets to the SC, the Reps may have put in place the new SCOTUS nominee, and then the matter can be ruled on with 9 Justices...
I read that maybe by the time this gets to the SC, the Reps may have put in place the new SCOTUS nominee, and then the matter can be ruled on with 9 Justices...
02-09-2017, 06:08 PM
#86
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 653
And why so wound up? Life is good. I have a great family I enjoy, at the airline of my dreams, and the drought is over for now. The only things that suck are my lakers, my dodgers, and the fact that Dio and Lemmy are gone. Who's next rob halford?
02-09-2017, 07:09 PM
#88
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 862
The Supreme Court can't properly judge anything now, because they only have 8 members. If they rule in a tie, then the lower court decision holds.
I read that maybe by the time this gets to the SC, the Reps may have put in place the new SCOTUS nominee, and then the matter can be ruled on with 9 Justices...
I read that maybe by the time this gets to the SC, the Reps may have put in place the new SCOTUS nominee, and then the matter can be ruled on with 9 Justices...
02-09-2017, 07:14 PM
#89
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,808
You mean the 9th circuit, which has the highest overturn rate by a mile, than any other circuit? I like those odds.
And why so wound up? Life is good. I have a great family I enjoy, at the airline of my dreams, and the drought is over for now. The only things that suck are my lakers, my dodgers, and the fact that Dio and Lemmy are gone. Who's next rob halford?
And why so wound up? Life is good. I have a great family I enjoy, at the airline of my dreams, and the drought is over for now. The only things that suck are my lakers, my dodgers, and the fact that Dio and Lemmy are gone. Who's next rob halford?
That you may have hard right conservative views (or any combination or shade of gray on any issue), awesome, that's what makes the world go 'round. The ability to agree to disagree and respect differing views is something the country is sorely lacking.
When the POTUS anger-tweets like 12 year old girl who didn't get her way, how do you defend that?
“SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!”
02-09-2017, 07:59 PM
#90
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 653
Life is good, on that we can agree.
That you may have hard right conservative views (or any combination or shade of gray on any issue), awesome, that's what makes the world go 'round. The ability to agree to disagree and respect differing views is something the country is sorely lacking.
When the POTUS anger-tweets like 12 year old girl who didn't get her way, how do you defend that?
If there are specific threats, he has all the power in the world (literally) to take care of that threat. In the meantime, maybe someone can explain to him how appellate courts work.
That you may have hard right conservative views (or any combination or shade of gray on any issue), awesome, that's what makes the world go 'round. The ability to agree to disagree and respect differing views is something the country is sorely lacking.
When the POTUS anger-tweets like 12 year old girl who didn't get her way, how do you defend that?
If there are specific threats, he has all the power in the world (literally) to take care of that threat. In the meantime, maybe someone can explain to him how appellate courts work.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
