Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Munoz comes out against borders. >

Munoz comes out against borders.

Search

Notices

Munoz comes out against borders.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2017, 12:32 PM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: 747 Captain, retired
Posts: 928
Default

Originally Posted by awax
Law and order? As in respect for existing US law and our country's 200+ year history of adhering to the rule of law as a matter of process? Or, are you talking about law and order in the context of the old west where justice is dispensed with a six-shooter just because they looked like bad hombres?

IF the executive orders are founded in law, they should stand up to scrutiny right?
Please read excerpt from 1952 Law: Section 212(f), states: "Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate."
Hmm, what part of that laws give the judicial branch any input? Hmmm?
krudawg is offline  
Old 02-08-2017, 12:53 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Default

Originally Posted by krudawg
Please read excerpt from 1952 Law: Section 212(f), states: "Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate."
Hmm, what part of that laws give the judicial branch any input? Hmmm?
When did Trump find that allowing entry to the aliens from the seven nations would be detrimental to the interests of the United States? I don't think that he ever found this to be the case. Rather, as outlined by Guiliani, Trump made a campaign promise to restrict Muslims and looked for a "legal" means of doing so. Trump may very well "believe" that they pose a threat but he has not "found" this to be the case.
CALFO is offline  
Old 02-08-2017, 01:03 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ugleeual's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 767/757 CA
Posts: 2,701
Default

He will win this battle as the language is clear and he does not have to show any proof or evidence of a threat... his word that there is a threat is sufficient per the law. The Supreme Court will rule eventually and it will stop this EO nonsense once and for all.
ugleeual is offline  
Old 02-08-2017, 02:36 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Supreme Court? Maybe so. But that'll be plenty of time for current Visa holders to get where they need to be. The gates are open! Come on in!!!
jsled is offline  
Old 02-08-2017, 03:08 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: 747 Captain, retired
Posts: 928
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
Supreme Court? Maybe so. But that'll be plenty of time for current Visa holders to get where they need to be. The gates are open! Come on in!!!
You bet. Let's send them all to your neighborhood.
krudawg is offline  
Old 02-08-2017, 03:14 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CousinEddie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,085
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
Supreme Court? Maybe so. But that'll be plenty of time for current Visa holders to get where they need to be. The gates are open! Come on in!!!
Yep. Let them in. Nothing to be concerned about in checking intentions.
https://www.aei.org/publication/911khalid-sheikh-mohammed-predicted/
CousinEddie is offline  
Old 02-08-2017, 03:45 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

I'm referring to the 10s of thousands of students and families who had their valid Visas revoked during this crazy BS order.

Trump's travel ban could affect tens of thousands of foreign students - Business Insider


You just wait until we get Trumped. Another stupid action like this one or just an errant tweet. It's coming. Go long oil and defense.

Last edited by jsled; 02-08-2017 at 04:19 PM.
jsled is offline  
Old 02-08-2017, 03:48 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,808
Default

Originally Posted by krudawg
Please read excerpt from 1952 Law: Section 212(f), states: "Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate."
Hmm, what part of that laws give the judicial branch any input? Hmmm?
Yeah interesting. How would you put this passage into the context of legal and vetted green card holders who have lived in the country for years. Non-citizens who own property and have kids in pubic school, pay their taxes, contribute to the community, but are now being banned from this country under this ban.

Or how about the rare examples of translators who provides service to US troops, risked everything for the US, lost much, and face possible death if forced to return to their homes. Turned away at the border with the same broad brush approach.

I have no doubt the administration can find some chicken sh&t passage to hang their hats on, but my problem is that it's being done in a vacuum and not under the rule of law on which our society is founded. Why the departure from governmental process?

The logic is the same as if you got a splinter and decided the only solution was to chop down every tree in the forrest.
awax is offline  
Old 02-08-2017, 04:12 PM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

Originally Posted by awax
....I have no doubt the administration can find some chicken sh&t passage to hang their hats on, but my problem is that it's being done in a vacuum and not under the rule of law on which our society is founded. Why the departure from governmental process?

The logic is the same as if you got a splinter and decided the only solution was to chop down every tree in the forrest.
Ding Effington Ding.

oldmako is offline  
Old 02-08-2017, 04:15 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

I think the corporate types (CEO's) don't mind open skies/open borders and NAI. They know that any and all downward pressure on wages will be good for the share-holders. Oscar Munoz is just taking care of business so to speak.

This is not all that different from the Aerlingus pilots flying on UAL metal across the pond on UAL routes. The net effect in the negotiating room is that it lowers the price of a pilot. Anyone flying for sub-par wages is a threat to the dignity of the profession and will ultimately work against everything our NC has done for the pilot group as well as the profession.

if we didn't like Aerlingus pilots flying our routes and our metal, then we won't like NAI pilots pushing wages and working conditions down either. The CEO's didn't mind Aerlingus pilots doing the work and it's no surprise that Oscar doesn't mind competition from NAI. He'll just wait for the next negotiating cycle to let us know what the new price of a pilot is.
baseball is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cheddar
American
61
06-30-2016 03:19 PM
oldmako
United
25
01-19-2016 02:53 PM
dvhighdrive88
United
41
11-05-2015 02:12 PM
Mitch Rapp05
United
44
10-17-2015 06:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices