Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Fleet Discussion and News >

Fleet Discussion and News

Search

Notices

Fleet Discussion and News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-26-2018, 07:51 AM
  #681  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by spaaks
It was meant to start a discussion, how about you contribute and say- I wonder if they’re having trouble finding used V arbii so they finally decided to pull the trigger on cfm’s? I wonder what the break even number of airframes is to add a second engine type to a fleet that currently only has a single engine type? I wonder how much it’ll cost then to train us on the cfm’s and what type of training it will be? Are they going to be over water certified? Acars2.0? Would they get rid of the bus completely or all the 319’s if they got a NSNB?
Well, V2500/CFM difference training could be done with a one hour pay credit takeoff learning video.
Do you know what engines United has on the 737?

As for overwater, does our current Airbus fleet maintain overwater certification? No? Then why would they certify it on only part of the fleet?

ACARS2.0? What's in them now? If it works now, it probably won't be changed out until the entire fleet gets harmonized with one ACARS. The Chinese aircraft have a slightly different ACARS than legacy aircraft.
Andy is offline  
Old 09-26-2018, 07:54 AM
  #682  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by Nucflash
Don't worry, there will be plenty more V2500s on property after the JB merger......
ROTFLMAO! Why would we do that? The DOT isn't going to allow United to keep that large a combined presence in the NYC MSA.
Andy is offline  
Old 09-26-2018, 08:06 AM
  #683  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 733
Default

Originally Posted by Nucflash
Don't worry, there will be plenty more V2500s on property after the JB merger......
Don't worry, there will be plenty more CFMs on property after the G4 merger.....
ecam is offline  
Old 09-26-2018, 08:36 AM
  #684  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

If you gentlemen want to fly at the lazy U, apply. It's very unlikely you'll be bought by United.
Andy is offline  
Old 09-26-2018, 08:49 AM
  #685  
Gets Weekends Off
 
rightside02's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: Airbus 320 Right Seat
Posts: 1,442
Default

Having flown both Jetblue/United’s Airbus . I agree this is a 20 min video in a CQDL course .

I agree not likely , but never say never. DOJ is for sale just like any other ***** in our government . They are willing to sel their souls for money . Any merger can be approved , just put the PR and money in the right places.
rightside02 is offline  
Old 09-26-2018, 09:04 AM
  #686  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,266
Default

I love a good rumor thread! If we’re buying anyone it’s F9.

TK source tells me their FAA POI and some other individuals are at TK having meetings.
Grumble is offline  
Old 09-26-2018, 09:14 AM
  #687  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 733
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
If you gentlemen want to fly at the lazy U, apply. It's very unlikely you'll be bought by United.
Wow, what an original comment. Didn't you also tell that to the CAL guys?
ecam is offline  
Old 09-26-2018, 12:30 PM
  #688  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
ROTFLMAO! Why would we do that?
So we can close the Florida base
Itsajob is offline  
Old 09-26-2018, 12:36 PM
  #689  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by ecam
Wow, what an original comment. Didn't you also tell that to the CAL guys?
LOL! Unable to use the search function? It's not difficult. Had you chosen to do so, you'd find that I stated a UAL/CAL merge made the most sense among available dance partners due to lack of route overlap, although my druthers were for no merger.
It is humorous that you would consider JBLU or G4 equivalent to CAL.

As for JBLU, a buyout makes zero sense unless the company can be bought for a value greater than the pieces. Plus there's the clause in your JFK gates that would create considerable problems in a buyout.
Be careful what you wish for; I for one would be screaming at my MEC for NWA/Republic sized fences. Most of your pilots would be long retired before anyone saw the left seat of anything bigger than an Airbus.
Rightside02 mentioned that the DOT is for sale. Well, they also go Robin Hood on occasion, depending on the administration. The previous administration saw 'reallocation' (aka theft) of legacy gates/slots to 'disadvantaged' carriers aka JetBlue, Spirit, Virgin at some airports. Look up the percentage of NYC air traffic that is served by JBLU and UAL, then comment on the likelihood of the DOT allowing that to happen.

As for G4, how much equity is there in the planes? That is the value to the lazy U of that company and Gallagher and the stockholders wouldn't accept such a low offer.

There are more than a few used aircraft worldwide that are for sale without the hassles of a buyout. And frankly, the only carrier that would make any sense for United, American, or Delta to buy is Alaska.

Last edited by Andy; 09-26-2018 at 12:57 PM.
Andy is offline  
Old 09-26-2018, 12:38 PM
  #690  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
As for overwater, does our current Airbus fleet maintain overwater certification? No? Then why would they certify it on only part of the fleet?
Correction; I was thinking ETOPS. No UAL Airbii are ETOPS certified. Some of the fleet is overwater certified but not all of it.
Andy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 07:59 AM
gooddeal
Major
25
10-18-2014 04:43 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
20
06-22-2011 07:02 AM
Sink r8
Major
27
01-12-2010 08:47 AM
Lipout1
Cargo
3
07-25-2007 08:43 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices