Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Fleet Discussion and News >

Fleet Discussion and News

Search

Notices

Fleet Discussion and News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-2018, 10:26 AM
  #611  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
No way on Gods green earth do I want my financial security tied to a previous employer once I’ve stepped off the property for the last time. As was pointed out, they can and will steal it from you.
The point to having it controlled by a third party is the money can't be taken in Chapter 11, Chapter 7, hostile takeover, whatever. Even if it was controlled by the company (which it wouldn't be), the amount we're talking about would likely be below the PBGC maximum payout. Obviously, an unprecedented long term market downturn can wipe out pooled funds, but individual funds would be gone for many pilots before then anyway. One of the good things about an A Fund/DB is the security from having money pooled to smooth out market returns over the long haul.

I'm not pushing the idea and don't think it matters because there are so many obstacles (our previous experience with our DB plans; How is it administered? Where does the seed money come from?, etc.) to implementation, but I don't think it's necessarily a bad idea.
XHooker is offline  
Old 02-10-2018, 11:04 AM
  #612  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,725
Default

Originally Posted by XHooker
The point to having it controlled by a third party is the money can't be taken in Chapter 11, Chapter 7, hostile takeover, whatever. Even if it was controlled by the company (which it wouldn't be), the amount we're talking about would likely be below the PBGC maximum payout. Obviously, an unprecedented long term market downturn can wipe out pooled funds, but individual funds would be gone for many pilots before then anyway. One of the good things about an A Fund/DB is the security from having money pooled to smooth out market returns over the long haul.

I'm not pushing the idea and don't think it matters because there are so many obstacles (our previous experience with our DB plans; How is it administered? Where does the seed money come from?, etc.) to implementation, but I don't think it's necessarily a bad idea.
Right up the point where the true party that administers you pension starts referring to it as an “ unearned entitlement” when after years of sly underhanded mismanagement it goes broke. I think you need to get your head examined if you feel that placing your future in the hands of an entity that you have no say or control over sounds like a good idea to you.

Jimmy Hoffa anyone?
Airhoss is offline  
Old 02-10-2018, 11:15 AM
  #613  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GolferNJ's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Position: 777 FO
Posts: 217
Default

Anyone considering a pension in exchange for anything (especially scope) should read "Retirement Heist: How Companies Plunder and Profit from the Nest Eggs of American Workers" by Ellen Schultz. An oldie, but goodie. You have no idea the lengths United and Wall Street will go to raid any future pension. It is not a question of "if" but "when" a pension will be liquidated.
GolferNJ is offline  
Old 02-10-2018, 11:49 AM
  #614  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,725
Default

Originally Posted by GolferNJ
Anyone considering a pension in exchange for anything (especially scope) should read "Retirement Heist: How Companies Plunder and Profit from the Nest Eggs of American Workers" by Ellen Schultz. An oldie, but goodie. You have no idea the lengths United and Wall Street will go to raid any future pension. It is not a question of "if" but "when" a pension will be liquidated.
I don’t know where the like button is but YES double tap on the LIKE button for this post.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 02-10-2018, 04:22 PM
  #615  
Stuck Mic
 
Firsttimeflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,059
Default

Pension should be absolutely off the table.
I’m all for upping the company’s contribution to say 20% or more and be able to roll it into something other than a RHA once limits are reached. Guys with 20+ years left don’t need to dump that much into the RHA. Oh and company contributions should be added to profit sharing just like deltas is.

Instead of a pension, I’d rather see a ALPA run stock buyback program you can roll excess money into, be able to draw from and at a certain age completely cash out and once a certain percentage of company stock is purchased as a group we get a voting seat on the BOD.
Firsttimeflyer is offline  
Old 02-10-2018, 04:39 PM
  #616  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Originally Posted by GolferNJ
Anyone considering a pension in exchange for anything (especially scope) should read "Retirement Heist: How Companies Plunder and Profit from the Nest Eggs of American Workers" by Ellen Schultz. An oldie, but goodie. You have no idea the lengths United and Wall Street will go to raid any future pension. It is not a question of "if" but "when" a pension will be liquidated.
Caution. Read only one chapter in a sitting. Too depressing to do more
APC225 is offline  
Old 02-10-2018, 04:45 PM
  #617  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,202
Default


Instead of a pension, I’d rather see a ALPA run stock buyback program you can roll excess money into, be able to draw from and at a certain age completely cash out and once a certain percentage of company stock is purchased as a group we get a voting seat on the BOD.
ESOP..........
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 02-10-2018, 05:10 PM
  #618  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,244
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
Caution. Read only one chapter in a sitting. Too depressing to do more
It amazes me no one responsible for pension theft has been shot on their door step yet.
Grumble is offline  
Old 02-10-2018, 06:11 PM
  #619  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

The ERISA law was implemented with the intent to safeguard pensions. Like everything else, the lawyers and beancounters took the law and distorted it, so that any pension can be destroyed at the first economic downturn.

I have worked in two industries (steel and airlines) where most employees lost their A plans. After my experience at the first, I was amazed at the ignorance, and arrogance of our union in believing "it can't happen to us". I lost 180K+ in ESOP stock, and my A-plan to this arrogance. Never again.

I will take more B plan, but never want someone with different motivations than my own, managing my money.

Scope for an A-plan? Scope for a no-furlough clause? Never give up something now, for a promisary note far in the future. Especially when those promisary notes come with a Force Majeure clause.
Probe is offline  
Old 02-11-2018, 05:40 AM
  #620  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,725
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
It amazes me no one responsible for pension theft has been shot on their door step yet.
I’m surprised Glen Tilton and crew never got assaulted. What’s more surprising is that we’ve got guys who want to go back to a situation where that can happen again.
Airhoss is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
gooddeal
Major
25
10-18-2014 03:43 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
20
06-22-2011 06:02 AM
Sink r8
Major
27
01-12-2010 07:47 AM
Lipout1
Cargo
3
07-25-2007 07:43 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices