Fleet Discussion and News
#491
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
#492
Don't say Guppy
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Well sorta...
If brand X airline really really wanted to, they could advertise how much larger their seats are, how much more leg room there is in their coach section and directly compare it to brands Y and Z. And they could charge more, and get more but only if the differences were worth it. It would take significant effort and advertising dollars. But at some point the cheap, tiny slices of pizza could become a liability. But only if, larger slices were offered by the competition.
Not everyone is a cheap ***. Mercedes, BMW and Lexus sell a hell of a lot of cars. Giant SUV's and $50K pickups roam the land. A night at a nice hotel is easily 200 bucks. Designer pints of ale are ten bucks. But people have to be convinced that they are paying for something. In this case, space for their big (posterior selves). I don't think that todays airline execs really care. As long as they can rake in profits in the Billions, why fix anything? They just want to stay out of the headlines during their short tenure and then move on to a life of leisure.
Pat Patterson, Bob Six, Juan Trippe, Howard Huges, etc would likely never make it in today's airline world because their ideas would be deemed too reckless and a waste of money.
And now, the scrolling wheel of pricing on the web search engine won't support it.
If brand X airline really really wanted to, they could advertise how much larger their seats are, how much more leg room there is in their coach section and directly compare it to brands Y and Z. And they could charge more, and get more but only if the differences were worth it. It would take significant effort and advertising dollars. But at some point the cheap, tiny slices of pizza could become a liability. But only if, larger slices were offered by the competition.
Not everyone is a cheap ***. Mercedes, BMW and Lexus sell a hell of a lot of cars. Giant SUV's and $50K pickups roam the land. A night at a nice hotel is easily 200 bucks. Designer pints of ale are ten bucks. But people have to be convinced that they are paying for something. In this case, space for their big (posterior selves). I don't think that todays airline execs really care. As long as they can rake in profits in the Billions, why fix anything? They just want to stay out of the headlines during their short tenure and then move on to a life of leisure.
Pat Patterson, Bob Six, Juan Trippe, Howard Huges, etc would likely never make it in today's airline world because their ideas would be deemed too reckless and a waste of money.
And now, the scrolling wheel of pricing on the web search engine won't support it.
Brand X airline has been tried many times. You and me just called it Brand X because they were in business for such a short time, that nobody remembers their names.
I value comfort, and will pay for it. I think true Premium Economy is the way to go, and so do a lot of airlines. I read Lufthansa CEO claim it was their most profitable cabin. I think American is starting to try it now. 20 inch wide seat, and extra legroom.
Human beings are not a very efficient way to package meat into an airplane. We take a certain amount of space, and we need aisles to enter and exit. The greater the ratio of seats/aisle, the smaller and lighter the airplane can be. Airlines don't make money flying aisles around, only seats with revenue paying bodies in them.
FWIW i really liked our old lie flat business seats. They took up the floor space of about 4 coach seats, and they sold them for 4-7 times what a coach ticket sold for. A huge percentage of them were sold to revenue passengers. I would usually get 1st class before business when I was non-reving. I think the new Polaris is a disaster. They take up a bunch more space ( I haven't measured it, I would guess 6 or 7 coach seats), and we don't sell the seats for any more of a premium than we did the lie flat business seat. They might be comfortable, but we are giving away space that our passengers aren't paying anything more for.
My opinion.
#494
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 320 Captain
Posts: 655
James;
Brand X airline has been tried many times. You and me just called it Brand X because they were in business for such a short time, that nobody remembers their names.
I value comfort, and will pay for it. I think true Premium Economy is the way to go, and so do a lot of airlines. I read Lufthansa CEO claim it was their most profitable cabin. I think American is starting to try it now. 20 inch wide seat, and extra legroom.
Human beings are not a very efficient way to package meat into an airplane. We take a certain amount of space, and we need aisles to enter and exit. The greater the ratio of seats/aisle, the smaller and lighter the airplane can be. Airlines don't make money flying aisles around, only seats with revenue paying bodies in them.
FWIW i really liked our old lie flat business seats. They took up the floor space of about 4 coach seats, and they sold them for 4-7 times what a coach ticket sold for. A huge percentage of them were sold to revenue passengers. I would usually get 1st class before business when I was non-reving. I think the new Polaris is a disaster. They take up a bunch more space ( I haven't measured it, I would guess 6 or 7 coach seats), and we don't sell the seats for any more of a premium than we did the lie flat business seat. They might be comfortable, but we are giving away space that our passengers aren't paying anything more for.
My opinion.
Brand X airline has been tried many times. You and me just called it Brand X because they were in business for such a short time, that nobody remembers their names.
I value comfort, and will pay for it. I think true Premium Economy is the way to go, and so do a lot of airlines. I read Lufthansa CEO claim it was their most profitable cabin. I think American is starting to try it now. 20 inch wide seat, and extra legroom.
Human beings are not a very efficient way to package meat into an airplane. We take a certain amount of space, and we need aisles to enter and exit. The greater the ratio of seats/aisle, the smaller and lighter the airplane can be. Airlines don't make money flying aisles around, only seats with revenue paying bodies in them.
FWIW i really liked our old lie flat business seats. They took up the floor space of about 4 coach seats, and they sold them for 4-7 times what a coach ticket sold for. A huge percentage of them were sold to revenue passengers. I would usually get 1st class before business when I was non-reving. I think the new Polaris is a disaster. They take up a bunch more space ( I haven't measured it, I would guess 6 or 7 coach seats), and we don't sell the seats for any more of a premium than we did the lie flat business seat. They might be comfortable, but we are giving away space that our passengers aren't paying anything more for.
My opinion.
Polaris is keeping up with the modern standard of all aisle access, and no first class.
#495
Banned
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: CA
Posts: 320
Well sorta...
If brand X airline really really wanted to, they could advertise how much larger their seats are, how much more leg room there is in their coach section and directly compare it to brands Y and Z. And they could charge more, and get more but only if the differences were worth it. It would take significant effort and advertising dollars. But at some point the cheap, tiny slices of pizza could become a liability. But only if, larger slices were offered by the competition.
Not everyone is a cheap ***. Mercedes, BMW and Lexus sell a hell of a lot of cars. Giant SUV's and $50K pickups roam the land. A night at a nice hotel is easily 200 bucks. Designer pints of ale are ten bucks. But people have to be convinced that they are paying for something. In this case, space for their big (posterior selves). I don't think that todays airline execs really care. As long as they can rake in profits in the Billions, why fix anything? They just want to stay out of the headlines during their short tenure and then move on to a life of leisure.
Pat Patterson, Bob Six, Juan Trippe, Howard Huges, etc would likely never make it in today's airline world because their ideas would be deemed too reckless and a waste of money.
And now, the scrolling wheel of pricing on the web search engine won't support it.
If brand X airline really really wanted to, they could advertise how much larger their seats are, how much more leg room there is in their coach section and directly compare it to brands Y and Z. And they could charge more, and get more but only if the differences were worth it. It would take significant effort and advertising dollars. But at some point the cheap, tiny slices of pizza could become a liability. But only if, larger slices were offered by the competition.
Not everyone is a cheap ***. Mercedes, BMW and Lexus sell a hell of a lot of cars. Giant SUV's and $50K pickups roam the land. A night at a nice hotel is easily 200 bucks. Designer pints of ale are ten bucks. But people have to be convinced that they are paying for something. In this case, space for their big (posterior selves). I don't think that todays airline execs really care. As long as they can rake in profits in the Billions, why fix anything? They just want to stay out of the headlines during their short tenure and then move on to a life of leisure.
Pat Patterson, Bob Six, Juan Trippe, Howard Huges, etc would likely never make it in today's airline world because their ideas would be deemed too reckless and a waste of money.
And now, the scrolling wheel of pricing on the web search engine won't support it.
#496
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 805
James;
Brand X airline has been tried many times. You and me just called it Brand X because they were in business for such a short time, that nobody remembers their names.
I value comfort, and will pay for it. I think true Premium Economy is the way to go, and so do a lot of airlines. I read Lufthansa CEO claim it was their most profitable cabin. I think American is starting to try it now. 20 inch wide seat, and extra legroom.
Human beings are not a very efficient way to package meat into an airplane. We take a certain amount of space, and we need aisles to enter and exit. The greater the ratio of seats/aisle, the smaller and lighter the airplane can be. Airlines don't make money flying aisles around, only seats with revenue paying bodies in them.
FWIW i really liked our old lie flat business seats. They took up the floor space of about 4 coach seats, and they sold them for 4-7 times what a coach ticket sold for. A huge percentage of them were sold to revenue passengers. I would usually get 1st class before business when I was non-reving. I think the new Polaris is a disaster. They take up a bunch more space ( I haven't measured it, I would guess 6 or 7 coach seats), and we don't sell the seats for any more of a premium than we did the lie flat business seat. They might be comfortable, but we are giving away space that our passengers aren't paying anything more for.
My opinion.
Brand X airline has been tried many times. You and me just called it Brand X because they were in business for such a short time, that nobody remembers their names.
I value comfort, and will pay for it. I think true Premium Economy is the way to go, and so do a lot of airlines. I read Lufthansa CEO claim it was their most profitable cabin. I think American is starting to try it now. 20 inch wide seat, and extra legroom.
Human beings are not a very efficient way to package meat into an airplane. We take a certain amount of space, and we need aisles to enter and exit. The greater the ratio of seats/aisle, the smaller and lighter the airplane can be. Airlines don't make money flying aisles around, only seats with revenue paying bodies in them.
FWIW i really liked our old lie flat business seats. They took up the floor space of about 4 coach seats, and they sold them for 4-7 times what a coach ticket sold for. A huge percentage of them were sold to revenue passengers. I would usually get 1st class before business when I was non-reving. I think the new Polaris is a disaster. They take up a bunch more space ( I haven't measured it, I would guess 6 or 7 coach seats), and we don't sell the seats for any more of a premium than we did the lie flat business seat. They might be comfortable, but we are giving away space that our passengers aren't paying anything more for.
My opinion.
#497
Don't say Guppy
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
But Polaris is almost as space inefficient as the pods. Not quite as bad, but halfway there compared to the old lie class business. Checking ticket prices on a dozen routes, we aren't getting any more money for Polaris than we did for the lie flat business.
#498
Banned
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 94
Polaris 2 class 767-300 layout: 30 Polaris seats/184 coach
Polaris is not space inefficient vs the old lie flat seat. But it is a much better product.
#499
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 859
This is correct. The real genius of Polaris is the cabin density stays while creating direct aisle access for 100% of the customers. Mark your calendars, this may be the one time an airline came up with a novel business practice that makes more money than before without cutting costs while attracting new customers. Now we need to get it on every WB stat!
#500
Don't say Guppy
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
I am not sure how they did that as on a 777 they went form 8 across in BF to 6 across in Polaris. Maybe slimline seats in coach?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post