Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Fleet Discussion and News >

Fleet Discussion and News

Search

Notices

Fleet Discussion and News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-2017, 08:32 PM
  #491  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by M5000
All of this talk is great. The real question is what SWA wants because they’ll be the launch customer when they announce service to Europe.
They want a six pack and switches with white Jimmy hats.
Floyd is offline  
Old 10-12-2017, 08:39 PM
  #492  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
Well sorta...

If brand X airline really really wanted to, they could advertise how much larger their seats are, how much more leg room there is in their coach section and directly compare it to brands Y and Z. And they could charge more, and get more but only if the differences were worth it. It would take significant effort and advertising dollars. But at some point the cheap, tiny slices of pizza could become a liability. But only if, larger slices were offered by the competition.

Not everyone is a cheap ***. Mercedes, BMW and Lexus sell a hell of a lot of cars. Giant SUV's and $50K pickups roam the land. A night at a nice hotel is easily 200 bucks. Designer pints of ale are ten bucks. But people have to be convinced that they are paying for something. In this case, space for their big (posterior selves). I don't think that todays airline execs really care. As long as they can rake in profits in the Billions, why fix anything? They just want to stay out of the headlines during their short tenure and then move on to a life of leisure.

Pat Patterson, Bob Six, Juan Trippe, Howard Huges, etc would likely never make it in today's airline world because their ideas would be deemed too reckless and a waste of money.

And now, the scrolling wheel of pricing on the web search engine won't support it.
James;
Brand X airline has been tried many times. You and me just called it Brand X because they were in business for such a short time, that nobody remembers their names.

I value comfort, and will pay for it. I think true Premium Economy is the way to go, and so do a lot of airlines. I read Lufthansa CEO claim it was their most profitable cabin. I think American is starting to try it now. 20 inch wide seat, and extra legroom.

Human beings are not a very efficient way to package meat into an airplane. We take a certain amount of space, and we need aisles to enter and exit. The greater the ratio of seats/aisle, the smaller and lighter the airplane can be. Airlines don't make money flying aisles around, only seats with revenue paying bodies in them.

FWIW i really liked our old lie flat business seats. They took up the floor space of about 4 coach seats, and they sold them for 4-7 times what a coach ticket sold for. A huge percentage of them were sold to revenue passengers. I would usually get 1st class before business when I was non-reving. I think the new Polaris is a disaster. They take up a bunch more space ( I haven't measured it, I would guess 6 or 7 coach seats), and we don't sell the seats for any more of a premium than we did the lie flat business seat. They might be comfortable, but we are giving away space that our passengers aren't paying anything more for.

My opinion.
Probe is offline  
Old 10-12-2017, 08:59 PM
  #493  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

Originally Posted by Floyd
They want a six pack and switches with white Jimmy hats.
..."cut out"
oldmako is offline  
Old 10-12-2017, 09:02 PM
  #494  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 320 Captain
Posts: 655
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
James;
Brand X airline has been tried many times. You and me just called it Brand X because they were in business for such a short time, that nobody remembers their names.

I value comfort, and will pay for it. I think true Premium Economy is the way to go, and so do a lot of airlines. I read Lufthansa CEO claim it was their most profitable cabin. I think American is starting to try it now. 20 inch wide seat, and extra legroom.

Human beings are not a very efficient way to package meat into an airplane. We take a certain amount of space, and we need aisles to enter and exit. The greater the ratio of seats/aisle, the smaller and lighter the airplane can be. Airlines don't make money flying aisles around, only seats with revenue paying bodies in them.

FWIW i really liked our old lie flat business seats. They took up the floor space of about 4 coach seats, and they sold them for 4-7 times what a coach ticket sold for. A huge percentage of them were sold to revenue passengers. I would usually get 1st class before business when I was non-reving. I think the new Polaris is a disaster. They take up a bunch more space ( I haven't measured it, I would guess 6 or 7 coach seats), and we don't sell the seats for any more of a premium than we did the lie flat business seat. They might be comfortable, but we are giving away space that our passengers aren't paying anything more for.

My opinion.
If you were in first class as a non rev then those seats were given away for nothing to, or they were empty.

Polaris is keeping up with the modern standard of all aisle access, and no first class.
C11DCA is offline  
Old 10-13-2017, 04:42 AM
  #495  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: CA
Posts: 320
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
Well sorta...

If brand X airline really really wanted to, they could advertise how much larger their seats are, how much more leg room there is in their coach section and directly compare it to brands Y and Z. And they could charge more, and get more but only if the differences were worth it. It would take significant effort and advertising dollars. But at some point the cheap, tiny slices of pizza could become a liability. But only if, larger slices were offered by the competition.

Not everyone is a cheap ***. Mercedes, BMW and Lexus sell a hell of a lot of cars. Giant SUV's and $50K pickups roam the land. A night at a nice hotel is easily 200 bucks. Designer pints of ale are ten bucks. But people have to be convinced that they are paying for something. In this case, space for their big (posterior selves). I don't think that todays airline execs really care. As long as they can rake in profits in the Billions, why fix anything? They just want to stay out of the headlines during their short tenure and then move on to a life of leisure.

Pat Patterson, Bob Six, Juan Trippe, Howard Huges, etc would likely never make it in today's airline world because their ideas would be deemed too reckless and a waste of money.

And now, the scrolling wheel of pricing on the web search engine won't support it.
We already offer economy plus seats for extra legroom, at extra cost. There always open that's the seat I get when I commute. People want cheap as Hell then they want to birch about how much better the foreign airlines are. I had a guy at a party tell me how great The Asian carriers are, then he told me flies Delta economy because it's cheaper.
Zenofzin is offline  
Old 10-13-2017, 05:05 AM
  #496  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 805
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
James;
Brand X airline has been tried many times. You and me just called it Brand X because they were in business for such a short time, that nobody remembers their names.

I value comfort, and will pay for it. I think true Premium Economy is the way to go, and so do a lot of airlines. I read Lufthansa CEO claim it was their most profitable cabin. I think American is starting to try it now. 20 inch wide seat, and extra legroom.

Human beings are not a very efficient way to package meat into an airplane. We take a certain amount of space, and we need aisles to enter and exit. The greater the ratio of seats/aisle, the smaller and lighter the airplane can be. Airlines don't make money flying aisles around, only seats with revenue paying bodies in them.

FWIW i really liked our old lie flat business seats. They took up the floor space of about 4 coach seats, and they sold them for 4-7 times what a coach ticket sold for. A huge percentage of them were sold to revenue passengers. I would usually get 1st class before business when I was non-reving. I think the new Polaris is a disaster. They take up a bunch more space ( I haven't measured it, I would guess 6 or 7 coach seats), and we don't sell the seats for any more of a premium than we did the lie flat business seat. They might be comfortable, but we are giving away space that our passengers aren't paying anything more for.

My opinion.
If we don't offer aisle access lay flat seats the real money passengers will go fly someone else that does. There will always be better first class products out there with better service. The elderly woman flying HKG for the past 20 years isn't going to offer the same service as an Asian carrier that age discriminates. We are marketing a consistently good product that is mid range luxury with a price to match that might actually be sold. They can offer showers and bars and massages but that won't be us. Polaris isn't perfect but it isn't meant to be. We can't charge full fare first when we have upgrades sitting next to them abusing the flight attendants like it is Red Lobster. I sat next to an upgrade who requested the full turn down blanket service from the flight attendant while she was serving meals to full fare passengers. He made a fool of himself the whole flight with odd demands. If I was a full fare first passenger I would be embarrassed to be seen with some of our upgrades. I think they are trying to sell out the cabin of better than our previous business but below a true first class product.
Aquaticus is offline  
Old 10-13-2017, 05:07 AM
  #497  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

Originally Posted by C11DCA
If you were in first class as a non rev then those seats were given away for nothing to, or they were empty.

Polaris is keeping up with the modern standard of all aisle access, and no first class.
Yep, I agree. The 1st class pods went out of economic use by the late 90's. It was non-rev class and upgrade class for 10-15 years. The people that used to pay 10k for a pod started flying Netjets.

But Polaris is almost as space inefficient as the pods. Not quite as bad, but halfway there compared to the old lie class business. Checking ticket prices on a dozen routes, we aren't getting any more money for Polaris than we did for the lie flat business.
Probe is offline  
Old 10-13-2017, 05:59 AM
  #498  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 94
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
But Polaris is almost as space inefficient as the pods. Not quite as bad, but halfway there compared to the old lie class business. Checking ticket prices on a dozen routes, we aren't getting any more money for Polaris than we did for the lie flat business.
The old 2 class 767-300 layout: 30 BF lie flat seats/184 coach
Polaris 2 class 767-300 layout: 30 Polaris seats/184 coach

Polaris is not space inefficient vs the old lie flat seat. But it is a much better product.
tkt96 is offline  
Old 10-13-2017, 12:24 PM
  #499  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 859
Default

Originally Posted by tkt96
The old 2 class 767-300 layout: 30 BF lie flat seats/184 coach
Polaris 2 class 767-300 layout: 30 Polaris seats/184 coach

Polaris is not space inefficient vs the old lie flat seat. But it is a much better product.
This is correct. The real genius of Polaris is the cabin density stays while creating direct aisle access for 100% of the customers. Mark your calendars, this may be the one time an airline came up with a novel business practice that makes more money than before without cutting costs while attracting new customers. Now we need to get it on every WB stat!
ReadyRsv is offline  
Old 10-13-2017, 08:13 PM
  #500  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

Originally Posted by tkt96
The old 2 class 767-300 layout: 30 BF lie flat seats/184 coach
Polaris 2 class 767-300 layout: 30 Polaris seats/184 coach

Polaris is not space inefficient vs the old lie flat seat. But it is a much better product.
I am not sure how they did that as on a 777 they went form 8 across in BF to 6 across in Polaris. Maybe slimline seats in coach?
Probe is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
gooddeal
Major
25
10-18-2014 03:43 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
20
06-22-2011 06:02 AM
Sink r8
Major
27
01-12-2010 07:47 AM
Lipout1
Cargo
3
07-25-2007 07:43 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices