Search

Notices

Trump & Job Security

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-2016, 06:33 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 320 Captain
Posts: 655
Default

Originally Posted by baseball
Look at it a different way.

First define our current environment.


1. The ME3 are picking our pockets and their influence and dominance continues to grow thanks to the Government/Crown subsidies as well as sweat heart deals from Airbus.
Yet those ME3 are just as big Boeing operators, if not larger, even more so when factoring in future orders (777x). So of course it has to only be Airbus that offers "sweet deals".
C11DCA is offline  
Old 11-12-2016, 07:02 AM
  #12  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Default

Originally Posted by baseball
Look at it a different way.

First define our current environment.


1. The ME3 are picking our pockets and their influence and dominance continues to grow thanks to the Government/Crown subsidies as well as sweat heart deals from Airbus.

2. All Chinese businesses continue to flourish due to 4 factors: our extreme debt to China and China's manipulation of our currency, as well as China's stealing of intellectual property and their ability to not only be competitive in manufacturing, but dominate the sector. (those manufacturing jobs used to be in America).

3. NAFTA continues to hurt the US and Canadian economy in terms of movement of goods as well as relocations and closing down of over 70,000 factories from the USA.

4. NAI type carriers will continue to pick up steam. Combine that with the airborne version of NAFTA, ie (open skies) and you can see big storm clouds coming.


So.........Which trade deals currently in place help the USA's economy? Which ones are beneficial to US jobs? Which one's help both our strategic influence as well as our economic influence?

Now that we've really looked at the lay of the land you can better scrutinize which trade treaties should be eliminated, or modified, and further what line-item changes would the various economists recommend?
Trump has proposed a 45% tarriff on goods coming from China. Do you realize what that does to the price of, say, every cellphone made in the world?

https://www.google.com/amp/amp.timeinc.net/time/money/4564190/trump-trade-war-tariffs/%3Fsource%3Ddam?client=safari

United Airlines is FAR and away the largest US airline providing seats to China and has made it a key part of its overall business.

Do the math.

It will be interesting to see the reaction of the average, uneducated white person in middle America who voted Trump in when the cost of their iPhone goes to $1300 and we head into a major recession.
gettinbumped is offline  
Old 11-12-2016, 07:14 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Trump said a lot of things to buy those ignorant, desperate, anti Hillary votes. Watch him walk back some of the promises he made. The phrases "he didn't say that" or "what he really meant was" will be common place going forward. What scares me are the hidden agendas of Steve Bannon's alt right with the blessing of Congress.

How are those high tariffs imposed by a debtor nation going to work? Not well.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 11-12-2016, 07:15 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,171
Default

This change will bring devastation to labor and all working groups, airlines being just one of the smaller groups. Right to work, NAFTA, open skies--these are just the opening shots.

The indirect battle will be lost in the years ahead, not just during the Trump administration. Labor will be set back to the stone age in the courts. NLRB? Supreme court? Once the shift in court appointees takes place, all labor law and law suites become at risk. You thought we were powerless with the Railway Labor act as it stands now? Just wait and see how much bargaining power we have after Trump gets hold of it.

Pile all this on after the trade wars decimate traffic to Asia, and the change to 67 or 70, or lifted entirely. Get to a place you'll be happy, you may be there a while.
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 11-12-2016, 07:17 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bestglide's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: 756 left...
Posts: 472
Default

Thank goodness out union leaders backed Hillary.
Bestglide is offline  
Old 11-12-2016, 07:24 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
The phrases "he didn't say that" or "what he really meant was" will be common place going forward.
In a similar situation, Louisiana Gov. Earl Long had a better response. He instructed his press secretary to "Tell 'em I lied."
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 11-12-2016, 07:56 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ugleeual's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 767/757 CA
Posts: 2,701
Default

Originally Posted by tomgoodman
In a similar situation, Louisiana Gov. Earl Long had a better response. He instructed his press secretary to "Tell 'em I lied."
It's part of the business... Look at how HRC changed her "entitlement promises" when Bernie started getting close... She would promise anything to get a Bernie vote and would then blame congress after election she couldn't deliver because of their actions. Don't kid yourself about HRC... She would have been no better than Trump WRT airline pilots and the industry as a whole.
ugleeual is offline  
Old 11-12-2016, 08:16 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
robthree's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 777, sofa
Posts: 1,183
Default

Originally Posted by dvhighdrive88
The working class brought him in and they expect jobs. Attacking unions would be hugely un popular with his base.

I think this may be a mistaken impression. My feeling is that his base wants jobs. But they also hate unions. He and the GOP Congress can certainly sell that unions are 'job killers'.

Its to early to tell what Trump will bring. Even if he improves the economy overall, he may weaken labor. Or he could put up lots of trade barriers and travel restrictions, which would not be good for business travel or tourism. Or he could crash the entire economy.
robthree is offline  
Old 11-12-2016, 08:32 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,808
Default

Originally Posted by robthree
I think this may be a mistaken impression. My feeling is that his base wants jobs. But they also hate unions. He and the GOP Congress can certainly sell that unions are 'job killers'.

You can see the writing on the wall how NAI and ME3 will be leveraged against US labor to extract concessions..."Unions have to agree to "x" or we open the US market to the world...". I'd be shocked to see ALPA even mention what SOS would look like until months after we actually need it.
awax is offline  
Old 11-12-2016, 05:09 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by awax
You can see the writing on the wall how NAI and ME3 will be leveraged against US labor to extract concessions..."Unions have to agree to "x" or we open the US market to the world...". I'd be shocked to see ALPA even mention what SOS would look like until months after we actually need it.
We better not allow any age increases. ALPA better have that all sewn up.
baseball is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
58November
Safety
28
06-28-2013 06:38 AM
Sniper
Major
3
02-09-2012 08:54 PM
macgruber
Corporate
9
04-26-2011 06:36 AM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
2
12-02-2008 03:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices