Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
220 Additional Aircraft - 17,000 Pilot List >

220 Additional Aircraft - 17,000 Pilot List

Search

Notices

220 Additional Aircraft - 17,000 Pilot List

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-2016, 03:37 PM
  #21  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
Default

Originally Posted by Boeing Aviator
Don't shoot the messenger - Just passing on what I heard from several check airman who attended a recent Standards meeting. Oscar and other senior management gave briefings.

The company is planning on a net gain of 220 mainline aircraft by 2020. They say this will equate to 17,000 total pilots. It was also said to expect very large bids starting in June of 17. They also say when finished, TK will have a total of 40 Full Flight Simulators.

I know we've heard this before and it doesn't seem feasible given lower recent hiring numbers, significant future retirements and despite of all the hiring they past few years, we continue to stagnate around 12,500 pilots. Nevertheless, this is what senior management is telling check airman at this years annual meetings.

Thought I'd pass on what I heard from multiple check airman who attended these meetings.
That's actually already a throttled back prediction, just in June, BOEING AVIATOR was on here saying UAL would be at 18,000 pilots by 2021 so maybe 17,000 in 2020 is on glideslope.
full of luv is offline  
Old 09-19-2016, 04:07 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lambourne's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 844
Default

Originally Posted by full of luv
That's actually already a throttled back prediction, just in June, BOEING AVIATOR was on here saying UAL would be at 18,000 pilots by 2021 so maybe 17,000 in 2020 is on glideslope.
Full of luv,

Just for clarity you don't work for UA correct? But you do seem to have a lot of input to UA threads. Is their a reason for this constant chiming in on UA topics?
Lambourne is offline  
Old 09-19-2016, 06:29 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,808
Default

Originally Posted by Lambourne
Full of luv,

Just for clarity you don't work for UA correct? But you do seem to have a lot of input to UA threads. Is their a reason for this constant chiming in on UA topics?
Does it matter who he works for? He aptly, and very politely, called BS on what appears to be a continued rumor with no apparent source.

This thread started in June is what he's talking about.

http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/ma...th-hiring.html

Throughout the summer, has anyone else heard direct briefings from senior management or manpower planning about planned explosive growth. My experience with LCA's is that they tend spread more misinformed rumors than a ladies sewing circle.

For those analytical thinkers left out there, why would a CEO broadcast network growth strategy that could affect analyst's rating, and stock price, to an audience without confidentiality agreements?
awax is offline  
Old 09-19-2016, 06:35 PM
  #24  
Not retiring avatar
 
Monkeyfly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Position: 777 CAP
Posts: 771
Default

Originally Posted by awax
For those analytical thinkers left out there, why would a CEO broadcast network growth strategy that could affect analyst's rating, and stock price, to an audience without confidentiality agreements?
Misdirection and propaganda given to people who will readily spread it?
Monkeyfly is offline  
Old 09-19-2016, 07:04 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,808
Default

Originally Posted by Monkeyfly
Misdirection and propaganda given to people who will readily spread it?
Exactly, look at the audience - a room full of LCAs who are salivating over all the awesome knowledge they'll get to share throughout thousands of transition cycles (if such a briefing ever happened).

Management is priming the pump for the shiny jet syndrome 2.0. "If only we'd give in section six we could have ALL these airplanes!"
awax is offline  
Old 09-19-2016, 08:14 PM
  #26  
Banned
 
buscappy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 216
Default shack two

Originally Posted by awax
Exactly, look at the audience - a room full of LCAs who are salivating over all the awesome knowledge they'll get to share throughout thousands of transition cycles (if such a briefing ever happened).

Management is priming the pump for the shiny jet syndrome 2.0. "If only we'd give in section six we could have ALL these airplanes!"

shack

except not 2.0

version 8.0, at least...
buscappy is offline  
Old 09-19-2016, 09:21 PM
  #27  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
Default

Originally Posted by Lambourne
Full of luv,

Just for clarity you don't work for UA correct? But you do seem to have a lot of input to UA threads. Is their a reason for this constant chiming in on UA topics?
No, I don't work for United, I have many friends there throughout the seniority list, but have no inside knowledge.
I still have contact with many leaving the military considering the different airlines.
If UAL is indeed intending to not only replace retirees but grow their seniority list by an additional 5000+ pilots in the next 5 years, that has a huge impact on the legacy hiring market for pilots which really effects all of the industry.

I do like to hear that UAL is planning on growing and not shrinking though.

I guess we'll know soon enough, the ole crystal ball is always a bit murky.
full of luv is offline  
Old 09-19-2016, 10:55 PM
  #28  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

I have said this before, and I stand by it. The only way we get any kind of huge growth, is to buy an airline (including a BIG regional), or buy small jets to replace a BIG regional with mainline jets. Either way, we are absorbing the flying of United Express at the mainline, which is good for all UAL pilots. UCH doesn't really grow ASM's much, but the mainline does. This will unfortunately result in fewer frequencies, and open up slots at major airports for LCC competitors.

I believe we will do this in a desperate attempt to staff the current UAX flying. It is getting to be a food fight at the regionals.

Or, we won't.
Probe is offline  
Old 09-20-2016, 05:50 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,725
Default

Originally Posted by awax
Exactly, look at the audience - a room full of LCAs who are salivating over all the awesome knowledge they'll get to share throughout thousands of transition cycles (if such a briefing ever happened).

Management is priming the pump for the shiny jet syndrome 2.0. "If only we'd give in section six we could have ALL these airplanes!"
I don't care who you are, that right there is funny!
Every single instructor, evaluator, LCA, APD, and other training and flight management people are required to attend a three day standardization meeting every year. It is a fun filled, action packed event in Denver. And yes part of the meeting was the exact future training plan and growth plans for the next 5 years that have been reported here. I attended the first one in August.

Or maybe it was all a dream.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 09-20-2016, 05:57 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fireman0174's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired 121 pilot
Posts: 1,033
Default

Originally Posted by awax
Management is priming the pump for the shiny jet syndrome 2.0. "If only we'd give in section six we could have ALL these airplanes!"
I clearly remember Richard Ferris standing in front of the UAL-MEC and basically saying that.
fireman0174 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1st Supersonic
Atlas/Polar
20467
09-16-2024 04:08 AM
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
EZBW
United
131
05-04-2017 08:19 PM
APC225
United
13
05-29-2012 10:35 AM
SQUAWK3274
Military
12
02-21-2012 04:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices