Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
More 777-200s and 777-300 >

More 777-200s and 777-300

Search

Notices

More 777-200s and 777-300

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-24-2016, 11:42 AM
  #91  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default

Originally Posted by ReadyRsv
I agree with Guapo. While the -350 and 787s and -300s were ordered by different companies they serve different roles. Plus I like tray tables.
Me, too. I suspect that ultimately, the A350 will prove superior to the 787.

(Before the pundits ask why, it's because they didn't stretch to the limit of technology....more of a proven evolution of design. Sparky still has electrical issues (at the gate), and as I understand it, is extremely profitable enrote....but costs maintenance money and reliability getting airborne due to software problems).
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 09-24-2016, 02:18 PM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,339
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer
Sparky still has electrical issues (at the gate), and as I understand it, is extremely profitable enrote....but costs maintenance money and reliability getting airborne due to software problems).
That is true for any new airplane these days.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 09-24-2016, 07:13 PM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,171
Default

Originally Posted by catIIIc
Heard today at TK 21 more 777-300's coming from Boeing announcement coming soon. Most likely third quarter earnings report.

FWIW
I'd believe 21 total. That would be 7 more than we have announced now. That also matches several other rumors I've heard.

I don't think Boeing has that many delivery positions left. If there are, 21 more, I'd bet on replacing the A-350's instead of in addition to, but I don't think so. However, I've been wrong before.

Now, if it is 21 more, they are already seriously behind in training, how in the world are we going to train for that? We'd need another sim--but that would be planning ahead....
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 09-25-2016, 08:44 AM
  #94  
Pilot Response
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 479
Default

Originally Posted by ReadyRsv
I agree with Guapo. While the -350 and 787s and -300s were ordered by different companies they serve different roles. Plus I like tray tables.
With a traditional QWERTY keyboard on the back/bottom.
NFLUALNFL is offline  
Old 09-25-2016, 09:51 AM
  #95  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CLazarus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: 777FO
Posts: 770
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald
I'd believe 21 total.....I don't think Boeing has that many delivery positions left.
Puh-lenty of delivery positions left for the current generation 777 through 2019. According to Aviation Week as of 22 Aug, Boeing had only reached 20% of its 2016 widebody sales goal (remember, there are 8 net 777-300 orders for the year). More specifically: “We need to secure about 40-50 orders a year to fill the bridge [to the 777X]. We’ve not discussed the specific number of campaigns. Suffice it to say that we’ve got a lot of campaigns in work.” Maybe ultimately only 21 orders in total for us, but we could certainly get more at the right price quickly if we wanted or were able. I dunno what sort of price we negotiated for the 350s back when it was a seller's market, but I imagine we could get a nice discount if we volunteered to go to the back of the line so Airbus could keep other deliveries on time. Nice position to be in, due to extensive planning and forecasting I'm sure. Well played management!!!
CLazarus is online now  
Old 09-25-2016, 11:59 PM
  #96  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,171
Default

Originally Posted by CLazarus
Puh-lenty of delivery positions left for the current generation 777 through 2019. According to Aviation Week as of 22 Aug, Boeing had only reached 20% of its 2016 widebody sales goal (remember, there are 8 net 777-300 orders for the year). More specifically: “We need to secure about 40-50 orders a year to fill the bridge [to the 777X]. We’ve not discussed the specific number of campaigns. Suffice it to say that we’ve got a lot of campaigns in work.” Maybe ultimately only 21 orders in total for us, but we could certainly get more at the right price quickly if we wanted or were able. I dunno what sort of price we negotiated for the 350s back when it was a seller's market, but I imagine we could get a nice discount if we volunteered to go to the back of the line so Airbus could keep other deliveries on time. Nice position to be in, due to extensive planning and forecasting I'm sure. Well played management!!!
Agree. But, these are announced delivery positions. Wall street has recently become very panicky about capacity control, and airlines ordering. I'm sure our new board has something to do with keeping more orders unannounced. Stock price is everything to these guys.

Our situation is not unique. After the quarterly report, or even after annual earnings would be the time to announce orders for many airlines. My guess is, more than just us already have planes ordered.
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 12-13-2016, 07:28 AM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
The Polaris seat configuration for all aisle access was patented. We own exclusive license on it for 5 years.
Looks like we own the patent on the new economy seating as well, at least in the public's view. PR rollout somehow went wrong.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_1315.jpg (82.8 KB, 439 views)
APC225 is offline  
Old 12-13-2016, 08:25 AM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,171
Default

Of course everyone except management and marketing knows what is going to happen.

The average web shopper will click on the lowest price, then become outraged at what they do not get when they travel. More disenfranchised customers....if you want more, you have to pay for it.
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 12-13-2016, 08:58 AM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald
Of course everyone except management and marketing knows what is going to happen.

The average web shopper will click on the lowest price, then become outraged at what they do not get when they travel. More disenfranchised customers....if you want more, you have to pay for it.
This pricing/service plan was inevitable because of this. The rollout was poorly executed.
APC225 is offline  
Old 12-13-2016, 09:50 AM
  #100  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pilotgolfer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 1,982
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer
Me, too. I suspect that ultimately, the A350 will prove superior to the 787.

(Before the pundits ask why, it's because they didn't stretch to the limit of technology....more of a proven evolution of design. Sparky still has electrical issues (at the gate), and as I understand it, is extremely profitable enrote....but costs maintenance money and reliability getting airborne due to software problems).
I saw my first A-350 in SFO last week. I believe it was Thai Airways. Good looking machine.
pilotgolfer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices