UAL 2nd Quarter Results
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,244
#12
Don't say Guppy
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Cheaper landing fees? Yeah a little. But they run an EXTREMELY inefficiently orientated hub system. Running all those pax thru ATL means they fly those pax 20-40% more seat miles to connect them to their destination than we probably do. The vast majority of their pax going through ATL are connecting. A much larger percentage of our pax originate at one of our well positioned hubs. We simply fly them less miles to get them to their destination. I can't believe that isn't several times the savings as the difference in landing fees.
We have both been here a long time, and have heard a couple of decades worth of weak excuses as to why we aren't doing as well as our competitors. The "landing fee excuse" is just version 12.1, circa 2016.
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,244
Doesn't mean it isn't true. Ball park math based on publicly available info says that a Guppy runs $1600 to land at EWR, vs $700 in ATL. 777 is in the ballpark of $5000 vs $1600. Compound that a few times a day.
Agree on all facts, but their lack of efficiency doesn't seem to be hurting their bottom line. They've found the most profitable path with the limitations imposed and probably why UAL decided to do battle with the PA over landing fees.
http://www.northjersey.com/news/unit...yway-1.1151204
Agree on all facts, but their lack of efficiency doesn't seem to be hurting their bottom line. They've found the most profitable path with the limitations imposed and probably why UAL decided to do battle with the PA over landing fees.
http://www.northjersey.com/news/unit...yway-1.1151204
#14
It will be interesting to see if this top to bottom review Oscar is talking about will mean significant changes to our overall hub structure.
#15
Don't say Guppy
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
ATL is a low cost hub that DAL dominates to an extent that we don't come close to at our own high cost hubs. There are also no nearby surrounding airports to compete with ATL. ATL is a hub with a moat around it for DAL.
It will be interesting to see if this top to bottom review Oscar is talking about will mean significant changes to our overall hub structure.
It will be interesting to see if this top to bottom review Oscar is talking about will mean significant changes to our overall hub structure.
#16
Grumble, you are parroting a UAL beancounter, and the excuses they use for not doing better.
But they run an EXTREMELY inefficiently orientated hub system. Running all those pax thru ATL means they fly those pax 20-40% more seat miles to connect them to their destination than we probably do. The vast majority of their pax going through ATL are connecting. A much larger percentage of our pax originate at one of our well positioned hubs. We simply fly them less miles to get them to their destination. I can't believe that isn't several times the savings as the difference in landing fees.
But they run an EXTREMELY inefficiently orientated hub system. Running all those pax thru ATL means they fly those pax 20-40% more seat miles to connect them to their destination than we probably do. The vast majority of their pax going through ATL are connecting. A much larger percentage of our pax originate at one of our well positioned hubs. We simply fly them less miles to get them to their destination. I can't believe that isn't several times the savings as the difference in landing fees.
http://web.mit.edu/airlinedata/www/2...ng%20Fleet.htm
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 1,039
Actually, because of their hub location their stage length is the lowest of the big 3. So they are NOT extremely inefficient, we are. For that matter so is American by comparison. See for yourself.
http://web.mit.edu/airlinedata/www/2...ng%20Fleet.htm
http://web.mit.edu/airlinedata/www/2...ng%20Fleet.htm
#18
On Reserve
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 24
The company took a non-cash write down as a result of our EWR slots no longer having value because the FAA is eliminating slot controls at EWR.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post