Search

Notices

Proxy Fight at UAL BOD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-2016, 05:16 AM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Default

Originally Posted by baseball
Ben Hirst comes to mind as well.
Ben Hirst was the general counsel (not key decision makers at airlines) at CAL for only four years. He left for Northwest where his tenure was twice as long prior to the Delta merger. Who were the other six 'key decision makers'?
Flytolive is offline  
Old 03-30-2016, 07:15 AM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive
Ben Hirst was the general counsel (not key decision makers at airlines) at CAL for only four years. He left for Northwest where his tenure was twice as long prior to the Delta merger. Who were the other six 'key decision makers'?
There was Mike Campbell who was known for his ability to neuter unions.
El10 is offline  
Old 03-30-2016, 08:34 AM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by baseball
I am fairly certain that all investors are in it for the money. And all big investors are in it for the big money. All Institutional investors are in it for insane amounts of money.

They own both a piece of Delta and a piece of United strictly because of two factors: one United route network and two Delta's management team. For United they believe the route network is very strong and would be a formidable force to reckon with if higher PRASM's can be realized off those routes. On the Delta front, they know the top 8 managers from Gordon Bethune's turn-a-round of Continental are key decision makers at DAL and they are betting they will keep that airline efficient and competitive.

Since they aren't going "all in" on one airline over another, they are simply content to make a butt-load of cash from both. Too risky putting all their eggs in one airline basket.

If they can be successful in putting up candidates for each board they will be more likely to invest more money in both. This gives them "hedges" against their cash positions in being comfortable with the decision-making skills of their candidates.

It's sort of like Obama putting up an ultra liberal judge for Supreme Court. Obama doesn't have to wonder how that person will rule on abortion or other liberal special interests.

hedge funds and other institutional investment firms seem to do this allot at publicly traded companies when large sums of money are in play.
Baseball, the key players that turned around Continental are Brenneman and Bonderman. Neither are at Delta. Brenneman's Chairman of CCMP Capital. Bonderman's still a partner at TPG Capital. Bethune's performance at Aloha proves he's not the talent.

And let's not forget that United and Delta are tremendously more complicated beasts than Continental ever was.

As far as diversifying their bets, that's not true of Altimeter Capital. They've now got ~40% of their investments in United Airlines. Sure there's the other 60% mixed among other companies, but Brad Gerstner's making a huge bet on United. Here's a post where I've documented PAR and Altimeter's position in United:

Originally Posted by Andy
I dug through Altimeter and PAR's SEC filings and have compiled a history of their holdings in United. I've only gone back as far as 12/31/2011. Here are the links to the SEC filings:
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001541617&type=&dateb =&owner=include&count=100
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001051359&owner=inclu de&count=40&hidefilings=0
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?CIK=0001066867&action=getcompany

Altimeter Capital Management, LP
12/31/2011 2,359,108 SH
3/31/2012 1,406,553 SH (remained same until 12/31/2012)
12/31/2012 178,302 SH
3/31/2013 514,502 SH
6/30/2013 2,195,145 SH
9/30/2013 2,895,745 SH
12/31/2013 1,980,538 SH
3/31/2014 2,053,621 SH
6/30/2014 2,549,680 SH
9/30/2014 2,866,645 SH
12/31/2014 4,812,903 SH
3/31/2015 4,480,179 SH
6/30/2015
4,748,637 SH
9/30/2015 9,300,000 SH
12/31/2015 10,650,000 SH
3/8/2016 11,509,268 SH
PAR Capital Management Inc/PAR Investment Partners LP
No shares owned until 9/30/2014 filing
9/30/2014 800,000 SH
12/31/2014 1,805,000 SH
3/31/2015 1,885,000 SH
6/30/2015 2,642,632 SH
9/30/2015 5,380,000 SH
12/31/2015
6,423,600 SH
3/8/2016 14,389,711 SH


Based on the purchase dates, I suspect that this scheme has been planned since late 2014.
If you dig through Altimeter's quarterly filings, you'll see the size each holding represents within each fund. 13F Manager Holdings - Altimeter Capital Management, LLC
Brad Gerstner of Altimeter likes to make outsized bets with OPM (Other Peoples' Money). If his hedge fund blows up, he can close its doors and start over. If the bets pay off, he collects outsized management fees.
Andy is offline  
Old 03-30-2016, 03:21 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
Default

The real question you all should be asking is, why do these guys want control of the board?

The stock price by itself is rather limited so that can't be the real thing they want to affect.

My list of possible scenarios are:

1. They want to force a cash settlement to go away.
2. They could actually sell off parts of the route system for cash.
3. They just love the fight.

In it all I think we can all agree they really don't want to run an airline.
Regularguy is offline  
Old 03-30-2016, 03:41 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Default

Originally Posted by Regularguy
...why do these guys want control of the board?

The stock price by itself is rather limited so that can't be the real thing they want to affect.

My list of possible scenarios are:

1. They want to force a cash settlement to go away.
2. They could actually sell off parts of the route system for cash.
3. They just love the fight.

In it all I think we can all agree they really don't want to run an airline.
4. More share repurchases AAL, DAL & SWA
5. Dividends like AAL, DAL & SWA
Flytolive is offline  
Old 03-30-2016, 06:15 PM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 737 fo
Posts: 908
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
Baseball, the key players that turned around Continental are Brenneman and Bonderman. Neither are at Delta. Brenneman's Chairman of CCMP Capital. Bonderman's still a partner at TPG Capital. Bethune's performance at Aloha proves he's not the talent.

And let's not forget that United and Delta are tremendously more complicated beasts than Continental ever was.

As far as diversifying their bets, that's not true of Altimeter Capital. They've now got ~40% of their investments in United Airlines. Sure there's the other 60% mixed among other companies, but Brad Gerstner's making a huge bet on United. Here's a post where I've documented PAR and Altimeter's position in United:



If you dig through Altimeter's quarterly filings, you'll see the size each holding represents within each fund. 13F Manager Holdings - Altimeter Capital Management, LLC
Brad Gerstner of Altimeter likes to make outsized bets with OPM (Other Peoples' Money). If his hedge fund blows up, he can close its doors and start over. If the bets pay off, he collects outsized management fees.
Bondermen and Brenneman were definitely players but Bethune definitely played a major role. Brenneman left after only a couple of years. The biggest thing both Bonderman, Bethune and to a lesser degree Brenneman did was to bring in talented people and let them run their side of things. Larry Kellner was a great finance guy, and still is. He was a great pick for that position and an ok CEO. Smicek while a terrible CEO, was a great lawyer. Bethune and Bondermen were able to assemble a very talented MGT. team and then let them excell in their field. That was really Continentals strength, not one or 2 stars. As Jeff found out, that does not work so well.

As far as the new Delta and United being much more complicated, I just don't see it.
sleeves is offline  
Old 03-30-2016, 06:17 PM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive
Ben Hirst was the general counsel (not key decision makers at airlines) at CAL for only four years. He left for Northwest where his tenure was twice as long prior to the Delta merger. Who were the other six 'key decision makers'?
I don't recall that. The name Jennifer Vogel comes to mind when I think of Gen Cnsl.
baseball is offline  
Old 03-30-2016, 06:20 PM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

B and B were the big brains, but the guys that did the work and got things done were the "8 Amigo's." Bethune trusted 8 guys to get the grunt work done. It's a cool skill-set to be able to take what Bethune wanted done, and get B and B to hammer it out behind the scenes and then have 8 or so of your trusted agents to get things implemented on the operational side. Brennaman and Bonderman wouldn't get their hands dirty or attend middle management meetings.
baseball is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 04:40 AM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Default

Originally Posted by baseball
...the guys that did the work and got things done were the "8 Amigo's."
Any luck finding the 8 eight key decision makers who are running Delta who have the confidence of the hedge funds?
Flytolive is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 10:19 AM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by Regularguy
The real question you all should be asking is, why do these guys want control of the board?

The stock price by itself is rather limited so that can't be the real thing they want to affect.

My list of possible scenarios are:

1. They want to force a cash settlement to go away.
2. They could actually sell off parts of the route system for cash.
3. They just love the fight.

In it all I think we can all agree they really don't want to run an airline.
They can do a LOT of hijinx with control of the BoD, especially if they have the Chairman position.

They could sell off aircraft (sale/leaseback), routes, gates, slots for top dollar in the current market.

They could lever up the balance sheet and do a huge special dividend. Then sell off their stock holdings and leave United a heavily indebted shell of a company.

There are plenty of different ways that they can extract a ton of cash from United, many of which we wouldn't think of.

The bottom line is that they're not going to do the company any long term favors with their meddling.
Andy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EZBW
United
131
05-04-2017 08:19 PM
gettinbumped
United
0
12-11-2012 11:29 AM
Flyguppy
United
227
10-26-2012 03:23 PM
Regularguy
United
57
03-12-2012 04:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices