Search

Notices

A New Milestone

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2016, 05:04 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Default

Originally Posted by AllenAllert
Understanding where you're come from, I see why you answer that way. Did you secretly contribute to this foolish CAL lawsuit against ALPA.
No Staller.
intrepidcv11 is offline  
Old 03-06-2016, 05:10 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Default

Originally Posted by CousinEddie
Based on the $101K and the 734 contributors, we are talking about an average contribution of less than $140 per pilot in the last 23 months. All flap and no throttle, like the lawsuit itself to begin with. Ignore it and move on.
Nah lets all 'feel sorry' for 734 dumb@rses and drag out insults that were first hurled four years ago instead. Truly a milestone!
intrepidcv11 is offline  
Old 03-06-2016, 05:29 PM
  #43  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
Default

Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
Nah lets all 'feel sorry' for 734 dumb@rses and drag out insults that were first hurled four years ago instead. Truly a milestone!

But it's 734 pilots that feels that or had the stones to identify with that group. What does that represent 20% of the pre-merger CAL pilots?
AllenAllert is offline  
Old 03-06-2016, 05:35 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Default

Originally Posted by AllenAllert
But it's 734 pilots that feels that or had the stones to identify with that group. What does that represent 20% of the pre-merger CAL pilots?
No Staller?
intrepidcv11 is offline  
Old 03-06-2016, 05:38 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
Nah lets all 'feel sorry' for 734 dumb@rses and drag out insults that were first hurled four years ago instead. Truly a milestone!
Do you feel the CAL side was provided with effective, honest representation during the SLI?
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 03-06-2016, 06:03 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CousinEddie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,085
Default

Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
Nah lets all 'feel sorry' for 734 dumb@rses and drag out insults that were first hurled four years ago instead. Truly a milestone!
Agreed. Everyone knew prior to the UAL/CAL SLI that there would be a lawsuit afterwards. We know there will be one after AMR / US also. Why get spun up about it? I look at it as a plus in the long run. What are these misguided types supposed to say in the future when both the arbitrators and the courts didn't agree with them? Case closed. To those CAL pilots hired around the time I was and beyond that are now senior to me, have a nice career at UAL. I'll still look forward to hanging out with them on the layover.
CousinEddie is offline  
Old 03-06-2016, 06:32 PM
  #47  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
Do you feel the CAL side was provided with effective, honest representation during the SLI?
Absolutely not. Their leadership during the SLI was their problem. They might have done slightly better with better representation.

It would be like Staller representing l-UAL pilots during the SLI. We'd have been stapled for sure.
Probe is offline  
Old 03-06-2016, 06:34 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Default

ALPA is so powerful that they even convinced APA and USAPA to follow the same ISL method in the American ISL case as part of the cover up.

My lord, those of you flushing money down the drain why not spend some time doing research on what was done at DL/NW, 9E/XJ/9L and now AA/US. Why not also spend that money on either APAC, UPAC or the families of our deceased pilots.
El10 is offline  
Old 03-06-2016, 06:46 PM
  #49  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
Absolutely not. Their leadership during the SLI was their problem. They might have done slightly better with better representation.

It would be like Staller representing l-UAL pilots during the SLI. We'd have been stapled for sure.
No, I think Staller would have made a special case for YOU and had YOU stapled to the bottom of the list for selling out all United pilots some time ago. No need for me to explain to others but you know what I'm referring to. Why not come clean to your internet friends.
AllenAllert is offline  
Old 03-06-2016, 07:41 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
Do you feel the CAL side was provided with effective, honest representation during the SLI?
Better question, why do you ask given that you dug up this thread because "you feel sorry" for 734 CAL dumbarses? But yeah you sure have moved on. Meantime, let's both enjoy watching that compounding extension cash pile up baby!
intrepidcv11 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UAL T38 Phlyer
United
7
03-03-2014 06:25 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices