Search

Notices

TA Extension Passed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-22-2016, 07:07 PM
  #121  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,860
Default

Originally Posted by AllenAllert
I think he pulled his reference out of very thin air. His claim to have firsthand knowlege of executive meetings at OM house while he's currently going through a medical condition that most doctors would tell him to stand down for. Leadership form a sick bed that could potentially effect the enterprise and thousands employee and their families - not likely.

Enjoy your little raise.
It was at the latest CA upgrade class, there were thirty plus people in the room for every briefing. If you are calling me a liar you can go **** yourself.
JoePatroni is offline  
Old 01-22-2016, 07:32 PM
  #122  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hilltopper89's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 737
Posts: 1,061
Default

Originally Posted by AllenAllert
Hate to rain on the parade but ...... I thought the guy had heartburn and using it for his reason for the respite. Turns out he did have a condition that required the transplant. Bad assumption on my part but the guy really doesn't have a track record here at United except his board performance(no record) and I really don't believe in coincidence.

You can believe what you want about leaving guidance to the underlings but I highly doubt it. More like the Board giving the direction down to and controlling Hart. Yes, whether it's a $30B corporation or a $50K bakery, the boss has a heart attack, his focus is on self preservation and family. I don't think you'll find either jumping on hang-grenades nor would it be expected.
I think you're wrong and misguided. Guys don't get to be CEOs of multi-billion $ companies to give up when they have a medical problem. They get fired when they don't perpetuate a leadership philosophy. You're likely correct: he's completely disengaged from United. Give me a break. Then again, you've already convinced yourself that you're right about everything. I've gathered that in your posts here. Hate to rain on your parade.
Hilltopper89 is offline  
Old 01-22-2016, 07:36 PM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hilltopper89's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 737
Posts: 1,061
Default

Originally Posted by AllenAllert
And you know this - how? Did you get an invite?

Keep hope and dreams alive.
God, you have a complex about being right. Hello, Oliver Stone. You need a reference for everything that you disagree with but state as gospel anything you don't. I find it much more likely that Oscar had meetings with his staff while ill much more plausible than that he gave up completely and let United sail freely without a captain. Goodbye, credibility of AllenAlert. Just a loud voice with no following. Has to be right at any expense even when he states things that make no sense whatsoever. Your arguments and inane statements make you more unlistenable by the hour.

Last edited by Hilltopper89; 01-22-2016 at 07:47 PM.
Hilltopper89 is offline  
Old 01-22-2016, 08:21 PM
  #124  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 787 Captain
Posts: 1,512
Default

Originally Posted by ugleeual
United Forum has a bunch of fools who have no life… they will byatch and moan about everything. You have to sift through the posts to find the info your looking for… and ignore the cyber bullies who seem to spend every waking moment on that forum complaining about life.
Funny. I see you on there a lot.
AxlF16 is offline  
Old 01-22-2016, 10:49 PM
  #125  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,339
Question That good?

Originally Posted by Shrek
LOA 25 is dead !!

Outsider looking in - congrats on the contract extension (I think?). I have no dog in this fight, just trying to understand the lingo and why your contract extension passed by such a large margin?

What was the LOA 25 all about? Several people said they voted yes to "put an end to LOA 25"?? In plain language, what is it and how does this extension "kill it?"
Besides your pay raises - will you get any work rules improvements? How about health care, retirement, schedules?
This thread is part of the UAL/CAL merger sub-forum - is the contract extension related to or a result of the merger?

Here at big brown we've been negotiating since 2012 :-( so I definitely understand people getting excited over "finally getting it done" but what was so great about the extension that some of us might not be seeing?

Note, I'm not criticizing nor praising your contract extension, just trying to understand it..
Apologize my ignorance as I haven't followed ual (or other pax carriers) news for quite some time - so why the huge numbers of yes voters? Is it really a great contract extension?

Appreciate your inputs and I'll butt-out of your discussion..
whalesurfer is offline  
Old 01-23-2016, 03:47 AM
  #126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cadetdrivr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Default

Originally Posted by whalesurfer
Outsider looking in - congrats on the contract extension (I think?). I have no dog in this fight, just trying to understand the lingo and why your contract extension passed by such a large margin?

What was the LOA 25 all about? Several people said they voted yes to "put an end to LOA 25"?? In plain language, what is it and how does this extension "kill it?"
Besides your pay raises - will you get any work rules improvements? How about health care, retirement, schedules?
This thread is part of the UAL/CAL merger sub-forum - is the contract extension related to or a result of the merger?

Here at big brown we've been negotiating since 2012 :-( so I definitely understand people getting excited over "finally getting it done" but what was so great about the extension that some of us might not be seeing?

Note, I'm not criticizing nor praising your contract extension, just trying to understand it..
Apologize my ignorance as I haven't followed ual (or other pax carriers) news for quite some time - so why the huge numbers of yes voters? Is it really a great contract extension?

Appreciate your inputs and I'll butt-out of your discussion..
This TA is an extension of the joint post-merger United Pilot Agreement (UPA) with a few minor changes and one big one involving noticeable pay raises.

There are no significant changes to work rules, vacation, sick time, retirement, schedules, etc., other than a revision to the process and compensation for dealing with pay due to voluntary extensions of duty days. IMHO, the pay raises are the driving factor in the approval.

In the main body of the UPA full pay longevity was provided to all pilots who were previously furloughed. LOA 25 is a side letter included in the UPA that, among other things, effectively removed the pay longevity provision for certain previously furloughed LUAL pilots only. This was a result of some shenanigans and compromises that were made while the UPA was being negoiated prior to the seniority list integration process which followed.

Meanwhile, previously furloughed LUAL pilots had full longevity credit for vacation allocation calculations but previously furloughed LCAL pilots did not as a result of past practices at both pre-merger airlines.

The TA attempts to repair both issues and grants pay longevity to the former LUAL pilots and vacation calculations to the former LCAL pilots. Included in the TA is retro pay to compensate pilots who were affected by either issue during the time the UPA has been in effect.

Last edited by cadetdrivr; 01-23-2016 at 04:08 AM.
cadetdrivr is offline  
Old 01-23-2016, 04:06 AM
  #127  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by UALinIAH
It's common knowledge that the legacy UAL 757/767 fleet was thrown under the bus with pay banding in an attempt to influence the SLI. It's there now and I don't see us spending capital on raising the rate on a slowly dying fleet (767-300). I personally agree that our pay banding sucks serious ass, but based off of a/c orders and future retirements, it could be worse. The guppy (which I fly and think is a POS compared to every other plane in our fleet) will NEVER be a replacement for the 757-200 yet we get paid the same rate for it so it could be worse.
Agreed on all points. This is the third TA I have seen where it was written for the 737 fleet. I would also include the Airbus into that conversation. I haven't flown the 737 since 2001, but I am glad to stay away from it and plan on doing so for remainder of my career.
baseball is offline  
Old 01-23-2016, 04:10 AM
  #128  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by UALinIAH
I took his comments as 28 yr career. Not 28 year CAL career. Like maybe 28 years flying. I could be wrong and often am though lol.
I would say that 28 years of 121 flying is decent experience. And would give someone the perspective necessary to appreciate ( or critique) the current state of the industry. 22 years at CAL, hired after strike.
baseball is offline  
Old 01-23-2016, 04:11 AM
  #129  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by Hilltopper89
God, you have a complex about being right. Hello, Oliver Stone. You need a reference for everything that you disagree with but state as gospel anything you don't. I find it much more likely that Oscar had meetings with his staff while ill much more plausible than that he gave up completely and let United sail freely without a captain. Goodbye, credibility of AllenAlert. Just a loud voice with no following. Has to be right at any expense even when he states things that make no sense whatsoever. Your arguments and inane statements make you more unlistenable by the hour.
He just graduated from Riddle.
baseball is offline  
Old 01-23-2016, 04:16 AM
  #130  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Are there any other LOA's that we need to spend negotiating capital on? I think LOA 25 should be the last of the divisive issues. While ALPA spent considerable capital to "fix" it, it should help us turn the page as a pilot group and move forward.
baseball is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nerd2009
Major
171
07-04-2012 10:27 AM
ExAF
Major
10
06-29-2012 09:02 PM
angry tanker
Military
8
11-16-2009 06:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices