Base Trade IAH-SFO 320 FO
01-07-2016, 08:22 PM
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,202
Its going to cause exactly NO changes. The existence of the training center either way has no baring on the staffing of a base. The only change that might be seen is instructors coming back to the line in IAH instead of following the job to DEN.
01-07-2016, 10:56 PM
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 239
01-08-2016, 04:33 AM
#15
Guppy reserve EWR
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 501
Not sure if this is only how a few see it or not.
01-08-2016, 12:37 PM
#16
UCH Pilot
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: 787
Posts: 776
That's exactly what I'm referring to. Some have said (even IAH instructors), that all may have to re-interview for the DEN instructor positions and that the animosity between the different groups may cause too many issues in either getting the new position or simply that they don't won't to deal with it.
Not sure if this is only how a few see it or not.
Not sure if this is only how a few see it or not.
I asked and was told they can't fly the airplane so they can't be instructors. I pointed out that there isn't any prohibition to them flying it, just after we get to bid it. Sort of like a 777 standard Captain who can't hold it, but still is in that position.
Turns out shortly after they refused every single LUAL pilot many of them got it awarded on a bid, proving my point.
So when someone cries they got treated the same, I don't have sympathy for them. That's what happens when you have leverage, and use it poorly.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
