Search

Notices

Self funding TA?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2015, 05:21 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by Terrain Inop
This is my hang up with the TA as well... B scales suck, that's what this is. The question I keep going over is: Is it better to recapture the flying now (with a B scale), or drag this out and try to eliminate a potential C scale when the company brings these airframes on property? There's is no doubt in my mind that these planes are coming. But do we agree to fly them for a B scale, or do we fly them for a company imposed C scale? Don't think that can happen? Read section 3. Within 6 months of an order being announced there will be a pay scale, and there is no leverage on our part to keep the planes from flying.
You are exactly right. They can bring the CS100 on property without a published pay scale and binding arbitration will decide....meanwhile, they can pay $139/hr (published E190 rates) while we haggle. Keep in mind that our 2016 published rate for an E195 is $163/hr. That's surely where we'll end up after arbitration. Personally, I'll take the $185. It's decent and we get the 100 seater at mainline, if they even buy it. The idea that they will replace the 319 with the CS 100...especially with our new lease agreements is reaching.
jsled is offline  
Old 12-30-2015, 05:33 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
If this TA passes, it also gives DALPA ammunition to get a higher pay rate. Pattern bargaining. I don't think that one should overlook how these pay rates help DALPA get higher pay rates. This TA is low hanging fruit and will help other airline pilots negotiate for higher pay rates.
DALPA told our MEC that our TA would not help them attain their contractual goals. As Special Tracking correctly pointed out Section 6 is about the total value of the contract. DALPA's is worth hundreds of millions more than ours according to the Con statement.
Flytolive is offline  
Old 12-30-2015, 05:45 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive
DALPA told our MEC that our TA would not help them attain their contractual goals. As Special Tracking correctly pointed out Section 6 is about the total value of the contract. DALPA's is worth hundreds of millions more than ours according to the Con statement.
Source? This is the first I've read that DALPA made that statement.

Yes, I understand all of the tradeoffs in contract negotiations painfully well. I don't buy the argument that this doesn't help DALPA; several here have posted how much better DALPA's openers are dollarwise. It's a lot easier to get a higher dollar number if a competitor already has that payscale.
As far as the section 6 stuff, DALPA can go for pilot pay being the full 10.85% of revenues in their compensation package.

Is this TA perfect? No. But it's good. Perfect is the enemy of good.
Andy is offline  
Old 12-30-2015, 05:53 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
Source?
My reps. Give yours a call or send them an email.
Flytolive is offline  
Old 12-30-2015, 05:59 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

I don't know if it's been said yet but you guys are getting at least 15 of our (spirit) 319s over the next 5 years
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 12-30-2015, 06:04 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive
My reps. Give yours a call or send them an email.
Nah, not important enough for me to bug my reps. I'll take your word for it.

Did you see this communication from Southwest? They seem to think that United's TA helps them. http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/ua...an-update.html
Andy is offline  
Old 12-30-2015, 06:19 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive
My reps. Give yours a call or send them an email.
My rep said the opposite that our TA has helped them. Glad to know some reps just fabricate stuff. Let me guess your rep is based in ORD?
El10 is offline  
Old 12-30-2015, 06:23 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Default

Originally Posted by El10
My rep said the opposite that our TA has helped them.
That is not the opposite. Your rep gave his opinion. My reps relayed that the MEC was briefed that DALPA doesn't think our TA will help them attaining the contractual gains they are seeking.
Flytolive is offline  
Old 12-30-2015, 06:59 PM
  #29  
Stuck Mic
 
Firsttimeflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,059
Default

What would you rather have. CS100/300 on mainline or on regional property.

I'm sorry but RJs or any new Large RJ flying must be at mainline. When will you learn. I've watched Dal, UAL, AAL guys all **** and moan about regional planes, regional pilots, regional payrates when they and their predecessors created the problem. It sure isn't the regional guys problem he has to get to mainline after trying to work his way through a regional.

Even worst case as it is, lowest payrates go to FOs. 3-5 near upgrades even at close to narrow body FO rates. You/We are realiativly protected. Better to be stuck on a large RJ at those payrates then double furloughed and then tossed to the wolves for longevity. Let alone a pilot at "mainline" is a captain while you are a double furloughed guy with 13+ years longevity but are junior to them.

Would you guys rather have that with the possibility to get downgraded to such, or would you rather be furloughed and then come back without seniority, without longevity, without pass travel benefits etc......
Firsttimeflyer is offline  
Old 12-30-2015, 07:18 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 303
Default

I heard if we vote no the company will come back to us in 5 business days with a 69% raise and everyone gets a pony.
Scrappy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kc135driver
Money Talk
4
03-23-2011 09:37 AM
JoeMerchant
Regional
96
10-22-2009 07:17 PM
klsfdx
Cargo
10
03-08-2009 06:02 PM
LeoSV
Hangar Talk
0
06-27-2007 03:59 AM
SikPilot
Major
1
03-29-2007 02:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices