Search

Notices

Fixes to reserve

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-2016, 03:11 PM
  #251  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ugleeual's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 767/757 CA
Posts: 2,701
Default

Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
That's an interesting idea that I've never considered. It might even work.
genius idea actually... there is an open C11 LEC position that needs to be filled!
ugleeual is offline  
Old 05-10-2016, 05:38 PM
  #252  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CLazarus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: 777FO
Posts: 770
Default

Originally Posted by Yak02
Just do away with reserve lines....
I like the idea too, on the surface at least.
CLazarus is offline  
Old 05-10-2016, 10:16 PM
  #253  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

Originally Posted by Yak02
Just do away with reserve lines....

For each BES, build 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 day reserve pairings. They are bid in PBS just like a regular flying assignment. Every one is a line holder. You can pick them up and trade them as a normal trip. The pay is 5 hours per day.

We already have the PBS computer programmed to do this with mixed lines. All they need to do is write a side letter and we could turn it on in July. You still have SRM to handle scheduling melt-downs. 15 reserve days at 5 hours per day pays 75 hours per month. You would find Senior pilots bidding and picking them up because they probably won't work on those days anyway. When scheduling get's nervous about reserve coverage they could throw in a reserve pairing worth 5 hours per day and someone would pick it up for the pay.

Unfortunately, our Union would never entertain the thought of this idea because it doesn't fit into there very small "inside the box" negotiating rules. There are a lot of good ideas that Pilot's have out there. The Volunteer SME's in this Union just can't listen.
Except for the whole "law of unintended consequences". Like the guy who bid a 5 day reserve line/window, then still wants to sit at home in front of his pool in PHX. No change from the current system.

The perceived SC and FSB abuse sounds much more like incompetence and lack of training on the part of crew scheduling. Contractual change doesn't fix stupid.

Commuting to reserve will NEVER, EVER be as good as being the number one wide body captain lines. The rest of us will never vote to support such change, as it would cost us all too much, to benefit a very small number. That is why they call it a "union".

"Fixes to reserve" and satellite bases will not happen. 80% of us will vote no.
Probe is offline  
Old 05-10-2016, 10:53 PM
  #254  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Yak02's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B-787 Captain
Posts: 183
Default

FSIMS has allowances for POI's to deviate from FAR 117 rules that would allow SC/LC and rules for FSB to by replaced by agreed upon scheduling rules in the Fatigue Mitigation Program requirements.
In other words we could completely do away with SC and FSB as we know it.

How about when on a Reserve Assignment you simply just need to be available to show in say 2:30. You would be on reserve 24 hours a day! Oh, and the company puts you up in a Hotel near the airport. If you want to stay at home it's your call.

The point is as a UNION you can do anything you all can agree on. It is time to break the mold on how this Union does business, it is terribly dysfunctional and antiquated. We certainly could do much better.
Yak02 is offline  
Old 05-11-2016, 04:25 AM
  #255  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dragon7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Pressing On
Posts: 524
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
Except for the whole "law of unintended consequences". Like the guy who bid a 5 day reserve line/window, then still wants to sit at home in front of his pool in PHX. No change from the current system.

The perceived SC and FSB abuse sounds much more like incompetence and lack of training on the part of crew scheduling. Contractual change doesn't fix stupid.

Commuting to reserve will NEVER, EVER be as good as being the number one wide body captain lines. The rest of us will never vote to support such change, as it would cost us all too much, to benefit a very small number. That is why they call it a "union".

"Fixes to reserve" and satellite bases will not happen. 80% of us will vote no.
This is it in a nutshell. "Changes to reserve" that have a cost to the company AND/OR to the real or perceived QOL of senior folks is a nonstarter. But if we can get the MEC to address the SC/FSB assignment process that makes it transparent, viewable, and metric driven that is a win/win. The arguments on the extremes of paddling around on your non domicile pool on reserve or just assign everybody available a SC/FSB at 1640 to cover 2 departures are not tenable.

Maybe being able to bid LC or SC again is a possible solution. Allowing FSB into this contract was monumental stupidity, and it it has to be massaged a bit.

And no, it wasn't worth voting no at this point to fix. IMHO. If the entry point for the company on fixes to reserve is to do away with the 10am first day show, all negotiations should be accomplished by the NC from a Budweiser raft floating around in a pool in Phoenix.
Dragon7 is offline  
Old 05-11-2016, 04:32 PM
  #256  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

Originally Posted by Dragon7
This is it in a nutshell. "Changes to reserve" that have a cost to the company AND/OR to the real or perceived QOL of senior folks is a nonstarter. But if we can get the MEC to address the SC/FSB assignment process that makes it transparent, viewable, and metric driven that is a win/win. The arguments on the extremes of paddling around on your non domicile pool on reserve or just assign everybody available a SC/FSB at 1640 to cover 2 departures are not tenable.

Maybe being able to bid LC or SC again is a possible solution. Allowing FSB into this contract was monumental stupidity, and it it has to be massaged a bit.

And no, it wasn't worth voting no at this point to fix. IMHO. If the entry point for the company on fixes to reserve is to do away with the 10am first day show, all negotiations should be accomplished by the NC from a Budweiser raft floating around in a pool in Phoenix.
The 10 am first day show was never negotiated, but a by product of our current contract, plus 117. It is very expensive for the company. It is just sheer, dumb luck that we have it.

The "fix" to reserve will probably be that this goes away in the next contract, as we are unwilling to spend the capital to keep it. The current contract extension keeps all the bennies of the current system, including the 10 am show on the first day.

I bid reserve about half the time, and fly with reserves about 1/3 of the time. The only pilots I hear complaining about reserve are on this board. The last one I flew with that complained about our system was back in 07 or so.

Hopefully no changes to reserve. Any change, will probably be for the worse.
Probe is offline  
Old 12-06-2016, 04:33 PM
  #257  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

I'm thinking if it ain't broke...don't fix it!! I do a little VDO action and pick up some short calls to plus up the credit to lineholder level$...but in general, I just don't fly. Work smarter...not harder.

Jsled..the 4 day beard rsv necroposting dude
jsled is offline  
Old 12-06-2016, 06:29 PM
  #258  
Gets Weekends Off
 
detpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Trying not to crash
Posts: 1,260
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
I'm thinking if it ain't broke...don't fix it!! I do a little VDO action and pick up some short calls to plus up the credit to lineholder level$...but in general, I just don't fly. Work smarter...not harder.

Jsled..the 4 day beard rsv necroposting dude
Get rid of the 3 hour limit for picking up short calls/fsbs. I know about the computer glitch, but let's just get rid of it all together.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
detpilot is offline  
Old 12-06-2016, 06:48 PM
  #259  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
I'm thinking if it ain't broke...don't fix it!! I do a little VDO action and pick up some short calls to plus up the credit to lineholder level$...but in general, I just don't fly. Work smarter...not harder.
220 hrs YTD. Not complaining.
APC225 is offline  
Old 12-06-2016, 07:07 PM
  #260  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

Sled,

What's the point of revisiting this old dead thread now? Has gloating suddenly come into vogue?

From Google:

Gloating - to contemplate or dwell on one's own success or another's misfortune with smugness or malignant pleasure.

https://www.google.com/webhp?sourcei...F-8#q=gloating

20-25 percent of 11500 is a big number. There are a lot of guys on reserve and from what I read, not all are giddy. In fact, take a look at DCA 777 next month. The G line just jumped by 40 - 50 guys. That will put a lot of guys on SC who have been solid line holders for years. Many of them don't live anywhere near DC, so please spare us the "you bid it" argument. Twenty bucks says the number of PDR's from DC pilots jumps next month. While I'm glad its working well for YOU, that's not my idea of being a union member. What's next, sweet deals from Scheduling for flying over vacation?

As ST said, I'm having a tough time recognizing this new version of United Airlines.

Last edited by oldmako; 12-06-2016 at 07:35 PM.
oldmako is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10671
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
HercMasterJ
FedEx
29
10-05-2015 03:22 AM
dragon
Major
151
06-07-2012 03:21 PM
757Driver
Major
26
08-09-2011 05:50 AM
Hornetguy
Fractional
2
02-26-2007 12:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices