Search

Notices

Fixes to reserve

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2016, 03:15 PM
  #181  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

Originally Posted by Glenntilton
I'd like to see a limit on non-voluntary SCs. Say 4 max. Anything over that has to be picked up. I think that would help commuters and locals.
The only pilots I have heard who don't like SC's are on this board. Every single pilot I fly with on reserve wants as many as they can get.

The pilots that are complaining about reserve here are in the VERY VERY EXTREME MINORITY. Our reserve system rocks.

FSB should be paid. SNG is paid, I got it twice this year. 2 hours add pay each. I don't know why a SNG is any different than a FSB.
Probe is offline  
Old 01-27-2016, 03:18 PM
  #182  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ugleeual's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 767/757 CA
Posts: 2,701
Default

Originally Posted by UALinIAH
I'd say by definition it's within 200 miles of base. The contract move section is within 200 miles. Less than a 4 hr drive so too far for sitting SC. I'd like to see SC a 4 hour callout especially since it's an agreed to distance as well.

Someone mentioned a limit on involuntary SC. Sounds great as well, and maybe change it so voluntary SC has no limit on number.

All this can be done with LOAs. The MEC has the right man in the job, get resolutions out to start the process moving.
I'm not sure its a reasonable expectation that SC should be extended to 4 hrs… kinda defeats the purpose of having close-in and and quickly available reserve pilots to get a plane moving to its destination… so 2.5 is not unreasonable expectation IMO. I do agree that assignment of SCs is out of hand by crew desk but they do provide add pay if they assign to frequently… FSBs on the other hand should get 4 or 5 hours of credit time like it was in the past for driving in… would discourage crew desk from assigning multiple for fun.
ugleeual is offline  
Old 01-27-2016, 05:55 PM
  #183  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

Originally Posted by ugleeual
I'm not sure its a reasonable expectation that SC should be extended to 4 hrs… kinda defeats the purpose of having close-in and and quickly available reserve pilots to get a plane moving to its destination… so 2.5 is not unreasonable expectation IMO. I do agree that assignment of SCs is out of hand by crew desk but they do provide add pay if they assign to frequently… FSBs on the other hand should get 4 or 5 hours of credit time like it was in the past for driving in… would discourage crew desk from assigning multiple for fun.
lUAL always had an unofficial "4 hours to push", or 3 to show. Lots of pilots probably lived at the edge. I would definitely support going back to 3 hours to show time. Beyond that, defeats the purpose of SC.
Probe is offline  
Old 01-27-2016, 06:32 PM
  #184  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bottoms up's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Position: non reclining seat
Posts: 447
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
The only pilots I have heard who don't like SC's are on this board. Every single pilot I fly with on reserve wants as many as they can get.

The pilots that are complaining about reserve here are in the VERY VERY EXTREME MINORITY.
Sorry but your personal straw poll is not an accurate representation for the entire group. Look across the board at every a/c, every base, every seat. Some make no sense for the time and volume needed. There is no constant number. It changes according to the scheduler that morning. For example, there is no reason to get a midnight call to become the 4th guy for 2 day shortcall for LAX 787 c/a when there are no 2 day trips. Any reason for a 1 day shortcall for SFO 747 f/o?

A little consistency and some logical reasoning within fleets, bases, and seats would go a long way.
bottoms up is offline  
Old 01-27-2016, 07:09 PM
  #185  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hilltopper89's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 737
Posts: 1,061
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
The only pilots I have heard who don't like SC's are on this board. Every single pilot I fly with on reserve wants as many as they can get.

The pilots that are complaining about reserve here are in the VERY VERY EXTREME MINORITY. Our reserve system rocks.

FSB should be paid. SNG is paid, I got it twice this year. 2 hours add pay each. I don't know why a SNG is any different than a FSB.
Whether they like it or not is immaterial. We can spend all day arguing about it here and elsewhere but it doesn't matter: Reserve is THE FIRST concession we give on this and any TA. We can spend all day arguing about it but it's all in vain. Fact is that 95% (likely more) have a vote of whether to be on reserve or not. Arguing about how bad it is does 0 good ever because this is the first concession to be given away. Sorry. It's the truth. Just because you bid DEN and end up reserve doesn't mean anybody else cares. You could bid EWR and end up 40%. Boo hoo.
Hilltopper89 is offline  
Old 01-27-2016, 07:56 PM
  #186  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

Originally Posted by bottoms up
Sorry but your personal straw poll is not an accurate representation for the entire group. Look across the board at every a/c, every base, every seat. Some make no sense for the time and volume needed. There is no constant number. It changes according to the scheduler that morning. For example, there is no reason to get a midnight call to become the 4th guy for 2 day shortcall for LAX 787 c/a when there are no 2 day trips. Any reason for a 1 day shortcall for SFO 747 f/o?

A little consistency and some logical reasoning within fleets, bases, and seats would go a long way.
Here is my straw poll. Since 05 or 06, when lUAL when to SC/LC, I have flown with hundreds and hundreds of pilots. Lots of them on reserve, as I have been on reserve a lot of that time.

Other than APC, I have met exactly ONE, UNO, who didn't like our system, and complained about it. Of course, he complained the whole 4 day trip.

05 - 08, we didn't have the 10 am start for the first day. Our current system rocks.
Probe is offline  
Old 01-27-2016, 08:34 PM
  #187  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 383
Default

Probe:

I believe the complaint I hear is not the "system" in theory but the reality of having people on short call for no reason. I am currently 756 out of IAH and live 2.5 hours from work. For me reserve is great. However they will have 2-3 people on SC on a day with weather (thunderstorms, rain, fog) and on clear blue days they will put 8 guys on short call with 1 on field standby. No reason other than they can. It makes no sense in my opinion.

That's the complaint I hear most often. Not that this is a bad system when you first read through the UPA but UAL abuses the flexibility to create short calls/field standbys (although I don't often see FS). And in just over 2 years I have heard more than one person complain (not more than 10 but more than 1).
82spukram is offline  
Old 01-27-2016, 09:31 PM
  #188  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by 82spukram
Probe:

I believe the complaint I hear is not the "system" in theory but the reality of having people on short call for no reason. I am currently 756 out of IAH and live 2.5 hours from work. For me reserve is great. However they will have 2-3 people on SC on a day with weather (thunderstorms, rain, fog) and on clear blue days they will put 8 guys on short call with 1 on field standby. No reason other than they can. It makes no sense in my opinion.

That's the complaint I hear most often. Not that this is a bad system when you first read through the UPA but UAL abuses the flexibility to create short calls/field standbys (although I don't often see FS). And in just over 2 years I have heard more than one person complain (not more than 10 but more than 1).
just make sure you don't drink on rsv status or post FOM sections on this forum. It is prohibited by law.

Last edited by jsled; 01-27-2016 at 09:52 PM.
jsled is offline  
Old 01-27-2016, 09:57 PM
  #189  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
just make sure you don't drink on rsv status...
Only on short call.
APC225 is offline  
Old 01-28-2016, 05:53 AM
  #190  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bottoms up's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Position: non reclining seat
Posts: 447
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
Here is my straw poll. Since 05 or 06, when lUAL when to SC/LC, I have flown with hundreds and hundreds of pilots. Lots of them on reserve, as I have been on reserve a lot of that time.

Other than APC, I have met exactly ONE, UNO, who didn't like our system, and complained about it. Of course, he complained the whole 4 day trip.

05 - 08, we didn't have the 10 am start for the first day. Our current system rocks.
Because of 1 improvement the system now "rocks"? As a Lcal guy we had basically FARs for rules. Every day was a SC. No FIFO it was seniority so junior guys always got hosed while senior guys hid out on reserve.
Reserve is certainly way better than it could have ever been at Lcal but I'll stop short saying it "rocks". As someone pointed out the main angst is the way the company is abusing their ability to build SC on a whim with no rhyme or reason. If they want 8 den 320 f/os on short call for 1 day and 6 sfo 747 c/a on sc for 2 day fine. But make it consistent.
A scheduler should not have the ability to manipulate it based on what side of the bed they woke up on for no reason. Reserve is reserve but the company should ALWAYS be held accountable for their actions.... Just like we are
bottoms up is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10671
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
HercMasterJ
FedEx
29
10-05-2015 03:22 AM
dragon
Major
151
06-07-2012 03:21 PM
757Driver
Major
26
08-09-2011 05:50 AM
Hornetguy
Fractional
2
02-26-2007 12:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices