Search

Notices

Fixes to reserve

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2016, 07:33 AM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Not only are some predicting doom for the future, we have a select few lining up constructing the concessions on a pay raise that has yet to be implemented. The beat down mentality is astonishing.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 01-16-2016, 10:01 AM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,171
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
Not only are some predicting doom for the future, we have a select few lining up constructing the concessions on a pay raise that has yet to be implemented. The beat down mentality is astonishing.
+1 Trade the pay raise for reserve rules? Why not just vote no?
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 01-16-2016, 03:33 PM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald
+1 Trade the pay raise for reserve rules? Why not just vote no?
How about just vote yes, and build off these gains in section 6?

How does having 1 billon added to the starting point do anything but help?
El10 is offline  
Old 01-16-2016, 04:06 PM
  #94  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by El10
How about just vote yes, and build off these gains in section 6?

How does having 1 billon added to the starting point do anything but help?
You mean the starting point 3 years from now for which we received only 13-0-2 for? The starting point 2 1/2 years behind Delta vs 6 months?
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 01-16-2016, 04:20 PM
  #95  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 152
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
You mean the starting point 3 years from now for which we received only 13-0-2 for? The starting point 2 1/2 years behind Delta vs 6 months?
I've read numerous times your 13-0-2 argument. Can you point me in the right direction to verify this? The TA information has DOS, 2017 and 2018 pay scales. The 2017 is +3% DOS.
whtever is offline  
Old 01-16-2016, 04:43 PM
  #96  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
You mean the starting point 3 years from now for which we received only 13-0-2 for? The starting point 2 1/2 years behind Delta vs 6 months?
Well thankfully you can take the 2017 rates in the UPA and the 2018 rates in TA and do the math and see the folly in your 13-0-2 talking point. Also pattern bargaining is based on agreements not duration of negotiations. Again I have yet to see how we would be disadvantaged staring section 6 with this TA in place.
El10 is offline  
Old 01-16-2016, 05:28 PM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by El10
Well thankfully you can take the 2017 rates in the UPA and the 2018 rates in TA and do the math and see the folly in your 13-0-2 talking point. Also pattern bargaining is based on agreements not duration of negotiations. Again I have yet to see how we would be disadvantaged staring section 6 with this TA in place.
Folly? Yeah, it's all about the compounding driving that yes vote.

Contract Changes:
1. Adding the pay increases in this TA to the UPA schedule captures a
22.28% compounded increase above current 2015 rates by Jan 2018
a. UPA raise - 3% Jan 2016, plus
b. TA raise - 13% first bid period after ratification of this LOA, plus
c. UPA raise - 3% Jan 2017 (also included in TA), plus
d. TA raise , 2% Jan 2018

Are you really saying it's better to start negotiations 2.5 yrs after Delta vs .5?
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 01-16-2016, 06:11 PM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 152
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
Folly? Yeah, it's all about the compounding driving that yes vote.

Contract Changes:
1. Adding the pay increases in this TA to the UPA schedule captures a
22.28% compounded increase above current 2015 rates by Jan 2018
a. UPA raise - 3% Jan 2016, plus
b. TA raise - 13% first bid period after ratification of this LOA, plus
c. UPA raise - 3% Jan 2017 (also included in TA), plus
d. TA raise , 2% Jan 2018

Are you really saying it's better to start negotiations 2.5 yrs after Delta vs .5?
Gotcha, thanks. So, 3%, plus 13-3-2...
whtever is offline  
Old 01-17-2016, 01:40 AM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 1,039
Default

Originally Posted by whtever
Gotcha, thanks. So, 3%, plus 13-3-2...
Yeah some of the no guys try to make it look there is no raise in yr 2 by posting 13-0-2 because there is no additional raise above the 13% and the 3% raise already there. It's all in how you present it. IMHO should just say 13% above book rates with an additional 2% for the last year.
UALinIAH is offline  
Old 01-17-2016, 02:38 AM
  #100  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by UALinIAH
Yeah some of the no guys try to make it look there is no raise in yr 2 by posting 13-0-2 because there is no additional raise above the 13% and the 3% raise already there. It's all in how you present it. IMHO should just say 13% above book rates with an additional 2% for the last year.
I'm not trying to spin anything but rather simply separating what we already have vs what is being offered. For a two year contract extension we are offered a 13-0-2 raise. The 3-3 is under the current contract. How difficult is this to understand? Whtever's post makes me wonder.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10671
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
HercMasterJ
FedEx
29
10-05-2015 03:22 AM
dragon
Major
151
06-07-2012 03:21 PM
757Driver
Major
26
08-09-2011 05:50 AM
Hornetguy
Fractional
2
02-26-2007 12:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices