Leaked New pay rates.
12-21-2015, 04:50 PM
#61
Don't say Guppy
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
My yes vote won't be yes for a pay raise. It will be a "no" vote to waiting 2-4 years for a new contract, including a pay raise that may or may not be better.
At UAL, I have never voted "yes". Not once.
12-21-2015, 05:04 PM
#62
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: 737 Cap
Posts: 451
Scott
12-21-2015, 05:42 PM
#63
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 320 Captain
Posts: 666
Thanks for the correction on the process part. I agree with you about the need for new blood in the NC ranks. I am hoping that have been busy collating the survey results in preparation for early summer talks, even if they have to hand off their preparatory work to a new NC.
How will the company proceed if our side is not ready/willing to engage in early discussions? Quite a few moving pieces going forward depend on these AIP shenanigans.
How will the company proceed if our side is not ready/willing to engage in early discussions? Quite a few moving pieces going forward depend on these AIP shenanigans.
Definitely lots of unknowns. But that also isn't a reason to maintain the status quo of who is on the NC. A "new NC would have a couple of months minimum to get up to speed on various thing before openers are even exchanged, then add another 30 days before formal face to face happens.
DC
12-21-2015, 06:53 PM
#66
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
12-21-2015, 06:56 PM
#67
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
I think perhaps you may be overlooking the fact that a large part of this might just be an "olive branch" extended by a regime change. I personally don't think it's as simple as "the company is desperate for FRMS changes". When I ask myself the question; "would we have a TA on the table right now if Jeff were still in charge?" I think we all know the answer to that one.
12-21-2015, 07:17 PM
#69
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SFO Guppy CA
Posts: 1,112
I think perhaps you may be overlooking the fact that a large part of this might just be an "olive branch" extended by a regime change. I personally don't think it's as simple as "the company is desperate for FRMS changes". When I ask myself the question; "would we have a TA on the table right now if Jeff were still in charge?" I think we all know the answer to that one.
12-21-2015, 07:18 PM
#70
2 days off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: Embraer Systems Analyst
Posts: 1,853
You know I'm just laughing at this thread because it doesn't matter what section of this aviation forum we belong to we all follow the same formula as pilots.
Doesn't matter if we're Mesa or United, someone posts a new contract or pay scales and even if it shows like a billion dollars in new pay, without fail people always say, hmm I think we can get more. I nearly fell out of my chair when I saw your new proposed pay.
Doesn't matter if we're Mesa or United, someone posts a new contract or pay scales and even if it shows like a billion dollars in new pay, without fail people always say, hmm I think we can get more. I nearly fell out of my chair when I saw your new proposed pay.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
