Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
AIP->TA->Ratification Timeline >

AIP->TA->Ratification Timeline

Search

Notices

AIP->TA->Ratification Timeline

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-2015, 05:06 PM
  #11  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 218
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
Mitch....really? Since January is paid in Feb, the vote could happen in January and we could still get paid on time. Chuck, Svergin, and Fanatical NAILED it. We have an experienced Negotiating Committee. They didn't get duped. Sounds like you've been listening to all the Monday morning cockpit jockeys out there...."never take the first offer, if they want it that bad, they'll pay more"...yada, yada, yada. If the rumors are true, this is a slam dunk. Watch and see.

Sled
I think you're right sled. Time to quit reading the forums until we get something official. All of this speculating and what ifs is getting old!
Mitch Rapp05 is offline  
Old 11-30-2015, 05:10 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
UalHvy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 430
Default

Originally Posted by fanaticalflyer
Who cares that talks for full Sec 6 will commence in May!!! If it takes them the standard 4-6 years to get an agreement, that's 4-6 years of lost increase wages that we never ever get retro pay for. How idiotic. And you have a lot of faith in our economy thinking it will be in a bull run still which would set the all time record for bull runs. And of course the interest rate hikes will have no affect on the economy, housing market, stock market, etc. Very optimistic are you?! Why not have the pay raise and still go into full Sec 6 talks. If they drag it out, which they always do then we lose nothing. Plus we have the Me Too DAL clause so we won't be left behind. Too many dreamers out there.
EXACTLY. I agree.
UalHvy is offline  
Old 11-30-2015, 05:13 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
Mitch....really? Since January is paid in Feb, the vote could happen in January and we could still get paid on time. Chuck, Svergin, and Fanatical NAILED it. We have an experienced Negotiating Committee. They didn't get duped. Sounds like you've been listening to all the Monday morning cockpit jockeys out there...."never take the first offer, if they want it that bad, they'll pay more"...yada, yada, yada. If the rumors are true, this is a slam dunk. Watch and see.

Sled
If you trust the negotiating committee that much then why even vote on the agreement? Sometimes the negotiating committee can only get so far with the company. It takes a strong message from the pilot group to move the company in the right direction.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 11-30-2015, 05:28 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,202
Default

Originally Posted by specialtracking
the difference between you and i is when you say underpaid, you're fixated on section 3. When i talk of underpaid i'm referencing the whole contract.
a freakin men
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 11-30-2015, 05:42 PM
  #15  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default

Today's ALPA mail. Emphasis added by me:

November 30, 2015

Dear United Pilots,

Today, the MEC met in closed session for an update on negotiations and to review the Agreement in Principle (AIP) for a contract extension. The MEC heard briefings from the Negotiating Committee, ALPA’s Economic and Financial Analysis department (E&FA), and the UAL MEC’s Fatigue Risk Management System (FRMS) team. The briefings included a review of the AIP, detailed questions and answers, and an overview of the passed proposals and negotiations.

The AIP has piqued the curiosity of many. All of us on the MEC are anxious to get the specifics out to our pilots as soon as possible; however, until the final language is complete and the AIP has been converted into a Tentative Agreement (TA), there is no detailed information to share. The details are in the language of the Tentative Agreement which is well underway.

Nearly all of the forum posts, blogs, email threads, media reports, and other speculations are wrong, in part or in whole, as no one has the benefit of the final language of the TA. ALPA has a governance process controlled by the MEC that first requires a Tentative Agreement to be completed. Next, the MEC will have a copy of the TA for a minimum of seven days, then there will be a meeting for the MEC to consider the TA and then potentially pass it to you, the membership, to consider for final ratification.

The process should not and cannot be rushed or short circuited. The language writing is proceeding, and we will provide a Tentative Agreement to the MEC as soon as possible.
In other words, stop getting into heated debate here.
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 11-30-2015, 05:53 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer
Today's ALPA mail. Emphasis added by me:



In other words, stop getting into heated debate here.
Who's debating specifics? I'm talking about the value of leverage, the fact that the entire contract has a $ value vs only section 3 , the fact that the company is not doing this out of the goodness of their heart, and irrational and unfounded fear will cost money.

Hefner is just trying to control the message.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 11-30-2015, 06:14 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
Who's debating specifics? I'm talking about the value of leverage, the fact that the entire contract has a $ value vs only section 3 , the fact that the company is not doing this out of the goodness of their heart, and irrational and unfounded fear will cost money.

Hefner is just trying to control the message.
Goodness of their heart? Of course not. They are (allegedly) offering industry leading wages and reversing LOA 25. THAT is something and it has value. A lot of value. And it's Heppner, not Hefner...the guy who brought you contract 2012 and stopped the carnage on his watch after 2 years of NADA from the other chick. Heppner....the guy who survived the consolidation as MEC Chair, and now is bringing you INDUSTRY LEADING pay rates.
jsled is offline  
Old 11-30-2015, 06:26 PM
  #18  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
Goodness of their heart? Of course not. They are (allegedly) offering industry leading wages and reversing LOA 25. THAT is something and it has value. A lot of value. And it's Heppner, not Hefner...the guy who brought you contract 2012 and stopped the carnage on his watch after 2 years of NADA from the other chick. Heppner....the guy who survived the consolidation as MEC Chair, and now is bringing you INDUSTRY LEADING pay rates.
I am always skeptical. As much or worse than most, I think. But I also recognize results.

JH has gotten results. The company wanted MOU reauthorized 7 months ago. JH held out till now, and got a bunch more stuff. I think it might have been well played on our part.
Probe is offline  
Old 11-30-2015, 06:57 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
Goodness of their heart? Of course not. They are (allegedly) offering industry leading wages and reversing LOA 25. THAT is something and it has value. A lot of value. And it's Heppner, not Hefner...the guy who brought you contract 2012 and stopped the carnage on his watch after 2 years of NADA from the other chick. Heppner....the guy who survived the consolidation as MEC Chair, and now is bringing you INDUSTRY LEADING pay rates.
There in lies the sales job with the boilerplate words industry leading wages. Yes ladies and gentlemen, your leverage brought section 3 improvements over contracts with either rejected TA's or deflated JCBA's.

I do need help in understanding one topic though. Will TPA Jay's legacy be based on instituting LOA25 or freeing us from the shackles of LOA25 since both have his fingerprints?
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 11-30-2015, 07:01 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
I am always skeptical. As much or worse than most, I think. But I also recognize results.

JH has gotten results. The company wanted MOU reauthorized 7 months ago. JH held out till now, and got a bunch more stuff. I think it might have been well played on our part.
Did Hepner rescind MOU 22 or did the MEC kill it?
SpecialTracking is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JohnGardner
Regional
44
02-11-2014 06:50 PM
samballs
Regional
340
09-26-2012 09:23 PM
embflieger
United
46
09-01-2012 05:54 AM
32LTangoTen
Regional
0
08-19-2012 01:47 PM
SoCalGuy
United
327
08-18-2012 05:09 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices