Search

Notices

Next vacancy bid???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-2015, 08:50 AM
  #91  
Not retiring avatar
 
Monkeyfly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Position: 777 CAP
Posts: 771
Default Want to "fly" the 400?

https://youtu.be/7NjNL4Nsa4Q


For informational purposes:

Using the Staffing page, the bottom line-holders approx. active seniority # for SFO 747 in January:

Captain - #350
F/O - #4800 (#2700 for a flying F/O line)

Monkeyfly is offline  
Old 12-11-2015, 09:14 AM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Default

Originally Posted by Regularguy
I will bet not one of the captains on this 787 bid will be less than 2000 now that it is open to all. However I have been wrong before.

I think the real shock is coming to those who thought they would be line holders in SFO and now will be commuting to reserve.
It shouldn't be a shock. Simple math should have shown the reality of commuting to reserve was coming. I've had to hear way too much moaning by junior guys who live in IAH but bid Sparkie West Coast at >80%
intrepidcv11 is offline  
Old 12-11-2015, 11:39 AM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

The bulletin seems to say that this vacancy process will be a change to how new hires enter the fleet. Can someone explain what has changed?

"This vacancy will offer new positions on the 777, 787, 756, 737 and 320. We are using this vacancy to address our Summer 2016 needs on all fleets, as well as new hires (unfilled vacancies are required to fund new hire positions for pilots). There are no longer any fences on the 787/747 and all pilots are eligible to bid those fleets.

We are also focused on decreasing the seat imbalance, similarly to what we executed with the previous vacancy using the new hire vacancy as an opportunity to address seat imbalances as we staff to summer 2016. Any unfilled vacancy will allow new hires to enter service at that fleet and seat instead of redistributing them from historical new hire entry points. This will help maintain proper balancing and provide a more stable operation."
APC225 is offline  
Old 12-11-2015, 11:50 AM
  #94  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

I thought new hires going to pure wide body fleets, eg. 777, 400, and 787, was verboten.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 12-11-2015, 11:56 AM
  #95  
Half Winger
 
ARCLIGHT's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 121
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
The bulletin seems to say that this vacancy process will be a change to how new hires enter the fleet. Can someone explain what has changed?

"This vacancy will offer new positions on the 777, 787, 756, 737 and 320. We are using this vacancy to address our Summer 2016 needs on all fleets, as well as new hires (unfilled vacancies are required to fund new hire positions for pilots). There are no longer any fences on the 787/747 and all pilots are eligible to bid those fleets.

We are also focused on decreasing the seat imbalance, similarly to what we executed with the previous vacancy using the new hire vacancy as an opportunity to address seat imbalances as we staff to summer 2016. Any unfilled vacancy will allow new hires to enter service at that fleet and seat instead of redistributing them from historical new hire entry points. This will help maintain proper balancing and provide a more stable operation."
My interpretation is that FOs won't just go to EWR and SFO anymore, but will have initial bids across the system (probably N/A for DEN if I were to guess). That will help ease some of the shuffle associated with new hires like me who get EWR or SFO initially and then immediately lateral somewhere else. However, I would expect that the aircraft drops won't change significantly from what has been the historical norm (737/320/occasional 756). Again, just my interpretation. I can't imagine that they'd start awarding wide bodies to new hires, thereby allowing them to leapfrog people senior to them. I'm new here, but I'm pretty sure that's a no-no.
ARCLIGHT is offline  
Old 12-11-2015, 11:56 AM
  #96  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cadetdrivr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
The bulletin seems to say that this vacancy process will be a change to how new hires enter the fleet. Can someone explain what has changed?
The only change is the company's strategy, apparently.

As noted, new hires can only receive assignments that are the result of unfilled vacancies.

Thus, it would appear from the bleachers that the company is trying to "even" out the staffing so those vacancies will occur in junior seats in multiple bases instead of dumping all the new-hires in EWR and then having them all bid something else immediately.

This would appear to be a win-win-win for everybody concerned because it would mean that all ~12,500 pilots are at their first choice of base.
cadetdrivr is offline  
Old 12-11-2015, 12:06 PM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SFO Guppy CA
Posts: 1,112
Default

The only way that new hires would be able to get wide body positions is if there are vacancies that go unfilled after a vacancy bid. They even say that in the announcements. Planning repeats that unfilled vacancies will be used to fund positions for new hire pilots.
DashTrash is offline  
Old 12-11-2015, 01:58 PM
  #98  
UCH Pilot
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: 787
Posts: 776
Default

Originally Posted by ARCLIGHT
My interpretation is that FOs won't just go to EWR and SFO anymore, but will have initial bids across the system (probably N/A for DEN if I were to guess). That will help ease some of the shuffle associated with new hires like me who get EWR or SFO initially and then immediately lateral somewhere else. However, I would expect that the aircraft drops won't change significantly from what has been the historical norm (737/320/occasional 756). Again, just my interpretation. I can't imagine that they'd start awarding wide bodies to new hires, thereby allowing them to leapfrog people senior to them. I'm new here, but I'm pretty sure that's a no-no.
No. They aren't changing how new hires are assigned. They need to place them when they arrive based on training capacity. So new hires will be awarded the same way they always have. What that phrase meant about "vacancies for new hires" means that they can only create those new class vacancies out of unfilled positions. So this bid has lots of FO positions on the Bus and 73 that they know will not be filled and those will be offered to new hires the way they always are. That's all that means. They will still most likely be assigned EWR or SFO and then have to bid out once they have a vacancy after they are hired.
svergin is offline  
Old 12-11-2015, 02:12 PM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 953
Default

Originally Posted by b52dthdlr
in 2 years a CAP with 1500 seniority will not hold a line on the 787 in SFO. for the record, I will be surprised if anyone with a seniority number above 800 will hold SFO 787 CAP on 1603V.

the snapshot makes you look quite wise with the last prediction.

Junior Captain is 653 on SFO 787 CA
GoCats67 is offline  
Old 12-11-2015, 03:34 PM
  #100  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 756 left
Posts: 771
Default

[QUOTE=b52dthdlr;2025988]
Originally Posted by GoCats67
the snapshot makes you look quite wise with the last prediction.

Junior Captain is 653

just pulled it up..... there are serious imbalances on the 787 left seat due to the fence.... guys with seniority numbers of 2000 or more are going to have to decide if they are willing to spend the rest of their careers commuting to reserve... a number of those senior UAL guys that bid 787 left seat are 55 and younger
OTH I'm surprised at how junior SFO787 FO is on the snapshot. I think it'll get more senior the closer it gets to the final though.
89Pistons is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Peterborg
American
4
02-12-2015 03:36 PM
Pilot7
Regional
65
12-12-2013 09:52 PM
pilotgolfer
United
45
02-10-2013 11:08 PM
ERJ135
Regional
43
07-21-2008 07:49 PM
Diesel 10
Cargo
1
08-12-2005 12:59 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices