Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Contract extension AIP bullet points >

Contract extension AIP bullet points

Search

Notices

Contract extension AIP bullet points

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2015, 07:48 PM
  #21  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Default

Originally Posted by NFLUALNFL
Hey ALPA geniuses, Don't send us anything without most or all of this
I'm sure that they did a cost analysis of all of this. It would be WAYYYYYYY more than the 15/16% pay raise
gettinbumped is offline  
Old 11-20-2015, 07:50 PM
  #22  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Default

Originally Posted by contrail67
I never read we were even talking about Reserve stuff in this extension piece.
It was in there. 1 of the 5 items in the initial letter. If there are indeed no improvements that will be disappointing.... and I'm not in reserve
gettinbumped is offline  
Old 11-20-2015, 08:01 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 152
Default

"The remainder of the week was spent with both Parties analyzing the costs of the five items to be discussed during this negotiation (Compensation, retroactive longevity for furloughs, MOU 22 replacement, RESERVE ASSIGNMENT process improvements and FRMS.* This exercise, while time consuming, is essential since it allows for common understanding of what the individual provisions are worth."
whtever is offline  
Old 11-20-2015, 08:13 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

If...all true, we are netting a 15% pay raise. (16+3+2-3-3%) A 15% raise for three more years (that's if we get a contract on time) while the company benefits from huge revenue increases at the hands of ulh flying and the cost savings via extending a poor contract.

Yes, we might have a DAL me too clause for pay rates, but DAL has just shown that pay rates aren't everything. What if they go for large QOL improvements and accept minimal pay increases over our book rates? We are still left with substandard reserve rules, sick pay, vacation pay, training pay and many other issues for the foreseeable future.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 11-20-2015, 08:16 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

If this puny 13 percent raise goes through with zero improvements to reserve rules, then we are truly a spineless group. I hope that every myopic yes voter gets to enjoy years on reserve.
oldmako is offline  
Old 11-20-2015, 08:58 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
If this puny 13 percent raise goes through with zero improvements to reserve rules, then we are truly a spineless group. I hope that every myopic yes voter gets to enjoy years on reserve.
Did you vote Yes on the last contract?
intrepidcv11 is offline  
Old 11-20-2015, 08:59 PM
  #27  
Stuck Mic
 
Firsttimeflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,059
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
- provide rationale and limits to SCs and FSBs
- all unused SCs need to have add pay
- five hours credit for an FSB
- no rationale for min reserve levels; set so high no drops are allowed
- ability to drop and trade reserve days in CCS, reserve levels permitting
- ability to check in/acknowledge SCs and FSBs on CCS
- min days off match SWA of 15/16 days offs
- match SWA min guarantee pay of 79 hours
- monthly schedule frozen from scheduling's changing it; no rolled days off
- FC DH travel
- IT solution to provide automatic FC DH travel seat assignments
- delete 20-K-6-f. I.e., no "double pumps" (SC in a.m., released to p.m. trip)

Lots more but it's late
100% agree
Firsttimeflyer is offline  
Old 11-20-2015, 09:02 PM
  #28  
Banned
 
buscappy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 216
Default

[QUOTE=SpecialTracking;2014536]If...all true, we are netting a 15% pay raise. (16+3+2-3-3%) A 15% raise .....

look, clearly pilots aren't expected to be financial experts, but listen, any high school kid can do better math than this analysis. percentages are relative - a percentage of some other number. percentage raises don't add and subtract like apples. that 16% up front makes the 3% worth a lot more in dollars than a 3% would be without a 16% raise ahead of it. i only point this out hoping maybe 15% of pilots on the forum got at least a C in high school math - which may be hoping for too much eh
buscappy is offline  
Old 11-20-2015, 09:04 PM
  #29  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
If...all true, we are netting a 15% pay raise. (16+3+2-3-3%) A 15% raise for three more years (that's if we get a contract on time) while the company benefits from huge revenue increases at the hands of ulh flying and the cost savings via extending a poor contract.

Yes, we might have a DAL me too clause for pay rates, but DAL has just shown that pay rates aren't everything. What if they go for large QOL improvements and accept minimal pay increases over our book rates? We are still left with substandard reserve rules, sick pay, vacation pay, training pay and many other issues for the foreseeable future.
To play devils advocate, that 15% for 3 years is real money. For an average Captain, that's $30k a year x 3 years, or $90k. You assume that the contract would be on time. I can't remember the last time we had one of those! Let's say it goes another 2 years that's 15% per year while we negotiate, or ANOTHER $60k. Assuming DAL doesn't get a raise in the next 3 years above us. So you are reasonably talking $150k in extra pay over 5 years. That's not chump change.

I don't see the increased international flying and flexibility as a win for just the company. It's important for us to be able to utilize our new aircraft coming in to their fullest. That revenue that you say benefits the company also benefits us: profit sharing, health of the airline, increased international flying, etc.

On the flip side, if the rumor is true, no improvements in reserve rules is very disappointing, and the money isn't as good as I was hoping it would be. There are certainly some things that could stand to be improved through Section 6 that are important and the discussion is definitely appropriate as to whether it makes sense to accept this or turn it down and wait to start a full Section 6 in a year or so. I'll wait for the details and an explanation from the negotiating committee to decide how I'm going to vote
gettinbumped is offline  
Old 11-20-2015, 10:42 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
contrail67's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 737
Posts: 590
Default

A bigger issue is that our profit sharing metric was not changed or eliminated. When I have done reserve I have credited 82 hours+ and flew 2 times in that month....about 20 hours block.
contrail67 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
A321
American
89
01-28-2015 06:55 PM
Mitch Rapp05
United
49
11-22-2013 07:13 AM
32LTangoTen
Regional
0
08-19-2012 01:47 PM
old gasser
Union Talk
28
06-08-2008 12:31 PM
Sir James
Major
27
07-13-2006 12:26 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices