Contract extension AIP bullet points
#22
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 152
"The remainder of the week was spent with both Parties analyzing the costs of the five items to be discussed during this negotiation (Compensation, retroactive longevity for furloughs, MOU 22 replacement, RESERVE ASSIGNMENT process improvements and FRMS.* This exercise, while time consuming, is essential since it allows for common understanding of what the individual provisions are worth."
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
If...all true, we are netting a 15% pay raise. (16+3+2-3-3%) A 15% raise for three more years (that's if we get a contract on time) while the company benefits from huge revenue increases at the hands of ulh flying and the cost savings via extending a poor contract.
Yes, we might have a DAL me too clause for pay rates, but DAL has just shown that pay rates aren't everything. What if they go for large QOL improvements and accept minimal pay increases over our book rates? We are still left with substandard reserve rules, sick pay, vacation pay, training pay and many other issues for the foreseeable future.
Yes, we might have a DAL me too clause for pay rates, but DAL has just shown that pay rates aren't everything. What if they go for large QOL improvements and accept minimal pay increases over our book rates? We are still left with substandard reserve rules, sick pay, vacation pay, training pay and many other issues for the foreseeable future.
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
#27
- provide rationale and limits to SCs and FSBs
- all unused SCs need to have add pay
- five hours credit for an FSB
- no rationale for min reserve levels; set so high no drops are allowed
- ability to drop and trade reserve days in CCS, reserve levels permitting
- ability to check in/acknowledge SCs and FSBs on CCS
- min days off match SWA of 15/16 days offs
- match SWA min guarantee pay of 79 hours
- monthly schedule frozen from scheduling's changing it; no rolled days off
- FC DH travel
- IT solution to provide automatic FC DH travel seat assignments
- delete 20-K-6-f. I.e., no "double pumps" (SC in a.m., released to p.m. trip)
Lots more but it's late
- all unused SCs need to have add pay
- five hours credit for an FSB
- no rationale for min reserve levels; set so high no drops are allowed
- ability to drop and trade reserve days in CCS, reserve levels permitting
- ability to check in/acknowledge SCs and FSBs on CCS
- min days off match SWA of 15/16 days offs
- match SWA min guarantee pay of 79 hours
- monthly schedule frozen from scheduling's changing it; no rolled days off
- FC DH travel
- IT solution to provide automatic FC DH travel seat assignments
- delete 20-K-6-f. I.e., no "double pumps" (SC in a.m., released to p.m. trip)
Lots more but it's late
#28
[QUOTE=SpecialTracking;2014536]If...all true, we are netting a 15% pay raise. (16+3+2-3-3%) A 15% raise .....
look, clearly pilots aren't expected to be financial experts, but listen, any high school kid can do better math than this analysis. percentages are relative - a percentage of some other number. percentage raises don't add and subtract like apples. that 16% up front makes the 3% worth a lot more in dollars than a 3% would be without a 16% raise ahead of it. i only point this out hoping maybe 15% of pilots on the forum got at least a C in high school math - which may be hoping for too much eh
look, clearly pilots aren't expected to be financial experts, but listen, any high school kid can do better math than this analysis. percentages are relative - a percentage of some other number. percentage raises don't add and subtract like apples. that 16% up front makes the 3% worth a lot more in dollars than a 3% would be without a 16% raise ahead of it. i only point this out hoping maybe 15% of pilots on the forum got at least a C in high school math - which may be hoping for too much eh
#29
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
If...all true, we are netting a 15% pay raise. (16+3+2-3-3%) A 15% raise for three more years (that's if we get a contract on time) while the company benefits from huge revenue increases at the hands of ulh flying and the cost savings via extending a poor contract.
Yes, we might have a DAL me too clause for pay rates, but DAL has just shown that pay rates aren't everything. What if they go for large QOL improvements and accept minimal pay increases over our book rates? We are still left with substandard reserve rules, sick pay, vacation pay, training pay and many other issues for the foreseeable future.
Yes, we might have a DAL me too clause for pay rates, but DAL has just shown that pay rates aren't everything. What if they go for large QOL improvements and accept minimal pay increases over our book rates? We are still left with substandard reserve rules, sick pay, vacation pay, training pay and many other issues for the foreseeable future.
I don't see the increased international flying and flexibility as a win for just the company. It's important for us to be able to utilize our new aircraft coming in to their fullest. That revenue that you say benefits the company also benefits us: profit sharing, health of the airline, increased international flying, etc.
On the flip side, if the rumor is true, no improvements in reserve rules is very disappointing, and the money isn't as good as I was hoping it would be. There are certainly some things that could stand to be improved through Section 6 that are important and the discussion is definitely appropriate as to whether it makes sense to accept this or turn it down and wait to start a full Section 6 in a year or so. I'll wait for the details and an explanation from the negotiating committee to decide how I'm going to vote
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post