Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
More Small Narrow Body talk >

More Small Narrow Body talk

Search

Notices

More Small Narrow Body talk

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-2016, 07:12 PM
  #171  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 545
Default

Originally Posted by bigfatdaddy
The 900ER is such a great 757 replacement.....NOT! Just whisper "icing" and the 900ER will be weight restricted leaving 40 pax behind....😝
It's no 757 but as the company looks at its the biggest money maker.
GPullR is offline  
Old 01-08-2016, 07:53 PM
  #172  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CLazarus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: 777FO
Posts: 771
Default

Originally Posted by GPullR
The cs is a very capable airplane. United has no use for a 100 seat jet that can go 3000 miles, not its target audience. It's not going to happen.
That's a shame. A jet with that kind of range/capacity could open up all kinds of viable new nonstop city pairs such as CHS or JAX to SFO, or RNO to EWR. Or, it gives better one stop options to our prime international destinations (say JAX to SYD via SFO). Kind of like how the 787 is opening up new city pairs. Minimizing connections at hubs is a great way to improve on time rates and overall satisfaction.

I certainly don't claim any inside information, but Bombardier has changed its tune on pricing the CSeries within the last 6-9 months: Bombardier sees ?aggressive? CSeries pricing amid order drought | Toronto Star I think they need a big sale badly enough to do what it takes to win one from us. I don't think Embraer or AB/Boeing need the sale that bad. Nice article in Aviation Week this week on the C Series, if Bombardier is to be believed the CSeries is easily exceeding its performance targets.
CLazarus is offline  
Old 01-09-2016, 04:36 AM
  #173  
(retired)
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: Old, retired, healthy, debt-free, liquid
Posts: 422
Default

Originally Posted by bigfatdaddy
The 900ER is such a great 757 replacement.....NOT! Just whisper "icing" and the 900ER will be weight restricted leaving 40 pax behind....😝
No one said it is a "757" (much longer range, payload). However, it is replacing what a 757 did domestically (well under 757 range and payload).

Clearly, the metric works. Otherwise they wouldn't be doing it.
Old UCAL CA is offline  
Old 01-09-2016, 04:43 AM
  #174  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,244
Default

Originally Posted by Old UCAL CA
No one said it is a "757" (much longer range, payload). However, it is replacing what a 757 did domestically (well under 757 range and payload).

Clearly, the metric works. Otherwise they wouldn't be doing it.
Except for those days where every west bound super guppy, going to DEN has to buy off 20 pax because of forcast icing. In May (personal experience).
Grumble is offline  
Old 01-09-2016, 05:02 AM
  #175  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

Originally Posted by Old UCAL CA
No one said it is a "757" (much longer range, payload). However, it is replacing what a 757 did domestically (well under 757 range and payload).

Clearly, the metric works. Otherwise they wouldn't be doing it.
Well, it sorta works as a replacement. They can buy them, schedule them, put them on gates and sell tickets. They can then offer less room to the paying passengers. They can then bump pax and limit their bags. They can stop for gas, they can run the APU all the way to Hawaii and they can leave non revs behind. They can't take a full load to DEN in icing, can't carry a full load (east) out of Orange County, etc. etc.

Hell of a metric! "Otherwise they wouldn't be doing it" is a rather flimsy measure of success isn't it? After all, this is the same gang that brought us Shares, (including a whole slew of other IT failures - including nearly downing the entire fleet multiple times when Sabre/Dispatch functions crapped out), massively dorked up vacancy awards, put hundreds of guys in some based (doing nothing) while they cancel flights in others, etc etc etc.

Ford used to make an Edsel too.

Let's face it, the plane should have died a natural death 20 years ago. If not for SWA, Airbus would have crushed Boeing in narrow body sales. There's a reason that virtually all the US startups (JetBlue, Frontier, Spirit, Virgin) and dozens of other airlines worldwide have switched to the bus. (Insert chainsaw retort here)

Its the same fuselage cross section as the original 707. Look at the overhead and its 1967, look at the panel and its a triple. Look at the jump seat and its romper room.

Last edited by oldmako; 01-09-2016 at 05:28 AM.
oldmako is offline  
Old 01-09-2016, 05:22 AM
  #176  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by socalflyboy
Ok dad, thanks.
By implying skywest rates,which was wrong on my part, I was trying to say that 180/hr to fly a 195/e2 is like a skywest rate, underpaid, not a legacy Ual rate. But go ahead and vote yes, man. I mean, why would you want 250/hr when you can get 180...the e2 variant is closer to the cs300/737-500..but now that ur on the guppy, all must be good for you. Others will be flying a machine with a 3000k plus range, wt.comparable to a guppy or cs300 for pennies! There is a reason why momma U hasn't disclosed the order..a reason. Good luck to us all.
Any NSNB ordered today...if at all, won't be on property before 2019...at least that's the opinion of our Neg Comm Chairman (from the webinar). Heck the E195-E2 isn't even due out until 2019. So $194.57 effective Jan '18 is the TA rate. Not $180. I pity the fool who has to suck up that rate! "pennies" indeed! Go find me a better rate for a 100 seater anywhere.

737-700 Mtow 154.5 Range 4400
A319 Mtow 141.0 Range 3700

E195-E2 Mtow 129.4 Range 2000

http://www.embraercommercialaviation...ts-195-E2.aspx
jsled is offline  
Old 01-09-2016, 06:19 AM
  #177  
Gets Weekends Off
 
socalflyboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Cal reserve..the gift that keeps on giving
Posts: 532
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
Any NSNB ordered today...if at all, won't be on property before 2019...at least that's the opinion of our Neg Comm Chairman (from the webinar). Heck the E195-E2 isn't even due out until 2019. So $194.57 effective Jan '18 is the TA rate. Not $180. I pity the fool who has to suck up that rate! "pennies" indeed! Go find me a better rate for a 100 seater anywhere.

737-700 Mtow 154.5 Range 4400
A319 Mtow 141.0 Range 3700

E195-E2 Mtow 129.4 Range 2000

http://www.embraercommercialaviation...ts-195-E2.aspx
Ftr, I'm not trying to sway your yes vote...its most likely gonna pass with my no vote...however, riddle me this?
The T.A. Is announced from momma U..in the same breath there is talk of a snb ac on property,flown by momma U av8rs..then, the T.A. Gets approval for vote, there is no more talk of such ac order..there is an * next to two ac types...so why not announce what the ac will be prior to the vote? also, e190E2 range 2800/cs100 range is 3100nm. Both of these will fly the guppy routes,minus island stuff, for less coin than a guppy pilot. Like I said, it's like skywest again..meaning a crew on the crj 700 is basically doing the same job as we are,for much much less coin..you,jsled of all should know that momma U does
NOT have you or your family's best interest in mind. Oil is cheap, loads are maxed and the boys at the top are R O L L I N G in straight up cash.
I stopped reading the T.A. when I saw the pay scale rates, AND when I saw that ALPA ignored my/our request to have my travel board date adjusted to my hire date, that's right, more than 2 years difference from hire date to new date due to a b.s. furlough...this my man is a ZERO cost item to fix and keep everyone equal...
socalflyboy is offline  
Old 01-09-2016, 06:35 AM
  #178  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
Default

A very good friend of mine who flies UAL hates the RJ airplanes and, after a long conversation, I don't get it. I think the underlying issue is he and the other business people think the small jets are somehow below them, a step down in status.

Personally in order of comfort I find an aft seat in the super guppy(-900) is one of the worst experiences in commercial aviation. The next in line are the Spirit/Frontier non reclining plastic seats. I would rather fly in a full two and one RJ over these any day. Now consider a middle seat in a full wide body on a 15 hour flight, the destination better be worth it.

That being said a 757 aft seat in a full airplane is no picnic either.

The real motto is, "if you want cheap seats then there's a price to pay. "

Now what do I think of the guppy jump seat? Better than buying a seat when commuting.
Regularguy is offline  
Old 01-09-2016, 06:38 AM
  #179  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bigfatdaddy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 862
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
Well, it sorta works as a replacement. They can buy them, schedule them, put them on gates and sell tickets. They can then offer less room to the paying passengers. They can then bump pax and limit their bags. They can stop for gas, they can run the APU all the way to Hawaii and they can leave non revs behind. They can't take a full load to DEN in icing, can't carry a full load (east) out of Orange County, etc. etc.

Hell of a metric! "Otherwise they wouldn't be doing it" is a rather flimsy measure of success isn't it? After all, this is the same gang that brought us Shares, (including a whole slew of other IT failures - including nearly downing the entire fleet multiple times when Sabre/Dispatch functions crapped out), massively dorked up vacancy awards, put hundreds of guys in some based (doing nothing) while they cancel flights in others, etc etc etc.

Ford used to make an Edsel too.

Let's face it, the plane should have died a natural death 20 years ago. If not for SWA, Airbus would have crushed Boeing in narrow body sales. There's a reason that virtually all the US startups (JetBlue, Frontier, Spirit, Virgin) and dozens of other airlines worldwide have switched to the bus. (Insert chainsaw retort here)

Its the same fuselage cross section as the original 707. Look at the overhead and its 1967, look at the panel and its a triple. Look at the jump seat and its romper room.
Well said!........!!
bigfatdaddy is offline  
Old 01-09-2016, 06:58 AM
  #180  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 617
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
Except for those days where every west bound super guppy, going to DEN has to buy off 20 pax because of forcast icing. In May (personal experience).
What's up with this? My airline flies super stretch guppies and I've never heard of such a thing.
SVA402 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ToiletDuck
Money Talk
28
12-12-2018 04:24 AM
misterwl
American
0
06-27-2012 09:48 AM
alfaromeo
Major
30
11-11-2009 06:40 PM
hangaber
Major
5
07-09-2008 07:04 PM
Blue 2
Hangar Talk
2
06-28-2005 05:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices