Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
More Small Narrow Body talk >

More Small Narrow Body talk

Search

Notices

More Small Narrow Body talk

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-2016, 09:50 AM
  #151  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,244
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer
What's "the asterisk?"

By context, it must be in the proposed pay tables, but I don't have that copy....
E190 pay rates have an * with a foot note saying the pay rate includes the E2 variant.

Did you read the TA before voting?
Grumble is offline  
Old 01-08-2016, 09:51 AM
  #152  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer
What's "the asterisk?"

By context, it must be in the proposed pay tables, but I don't have that copy....
* Includes respective "-E2" variant


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embraer_E-Jet_E2_family

I could see the E195-E2 eventually moving into a higher pay band ... if we continue banding ... but not the E190-E2. First -E2 variant delivery isn't scheduled until 2018.
Andy is offline  
Old 01-08-2016, 09:52 AM
  #153  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Default

Originally Posted by socalflyboy
Because if you vote yes and they announce emb195*/e2 which is a big ass rj...close to 737 500 wt, and close to 3000nm range, your flying a guppy for skywest rates. If they inked a deal for cs300,and at 250ish an hour that would seem to me to be a change in my vote. Please tell me why a wb f/o is making more than a CAPTAIN on this probable 195/e2 ***,whatever you call it? Also, since there is an *, you know the company lawyers are gonna call them something different than they are=subject to more outsourcing.
Go ahead and vote yes..get ur 13%, and your loa fix, but hopefully this won't lead to furloughs. You and I both know that mgt has had a hard on for us pilots forever! Does a pig in lipstick ring a bell?
Huh?? I couldn't understand anything you were saying. But you might want to compare Skywest RJ rate ($117/hr) and the $185/hr the CS100/E2 would command. NOT. EVEN. CLOSE. If that was the plan, why would the company be ADDING mainline 737-700 and A319 frames??

Furloughs??? Have you read Section 1? How does ordering the E2 cause furloughs?
gettinbumped is offline  
Old 01-08-2016, 09:57 AM
  #154  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
E190 pay rates have an * with a foot note saying the pay rate includes the E2 variant.

Did you read the TA before voting?
I'm afraid if I vote, I'll get jury-duty.

(And the jury is out if we get duty rigs for that).
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 01-08-2016, 09:59 AM
  #155  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by socalflyboy
Because if you vote yes and they announce emb195*/e2 which is a big ass rj...close to 737 500 wt, and close to 3000nm range, your flying a guppy for skywest rates. If they inked a deal for cs300,and at 250ish an hour that would seem to me to be a change in my vote. Please tell me why a wb f/o is making more than a CAPTAIN on this probable 195/e2 ***,whatever you call it? Also, since there is an *, you know the company lawyers are gonna call them something different than they are=subject to more outsourcing.
Go ahead and vote yes..get ur 13%, and your loa fix, but hopefully this won't lead to furloughs. You and I both know that mgt has had a hard on for us pilots forever! Does a pig in lipstick ring a bell?
Having worked for SkyWest rates on furlough deuce, I can unequivocally tell you that you're incorrect. We were started at second year pay of $31/hr. Based on current SkyWest pay rates, that's now $38/hr.

A HUGE point of scope choke was to get the company to buy a SNB aircraft of a smaller gauge than the 319/737-500. And now some want to pizz away the opportunity so that a SNB Captain can be paid at a higher rate than a WB FO? The only way that's feasible is to significantly compress the entire pay scale and I don't think many would be happy with that outcome.
Andy is offline  
Old 01-08-2016, 10:13 AM
  #156  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 695
Default

Originally Posted by gettinbumped
Huh?? I couldn't understand anything you were saying. But you might want to compare Skywest RJ rate ($117/hr) and the $185/hr the CS100/E2 would command. NOT. EVEN. CLOSE.
Even further than that...
That's yr 20 Skywest which encompasses a pretty tiny group.
I suppose you could use UAL yr 6CA at almost 180 and yr 2 FO at 90+ (i.e., more than SKY yr 10 CA at 89 if I read it right, plus factor their FO rates as mentioned above), plus 16% and have much more realistic numbers.

Either way, keep the jobs at the major for every reason under the sun!
Chuck D is offline  
Old 01-08-2016, 10:23 AM
  #157  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by socalflyboy
Because if you vote yes and they announce emb195*/e2 which is a big ass rj...close to 737 500 wt, and close to 3000nm range, your flying a guppy for skywest rates. If they inked a deal for cs300,and at 250ish an hour that would seem to me to be a change in my vote. Please tell me why a wb f/o is making more than a CAPTAIN on this probable 195/e2 ***,whatever you call it? Also, since there is an *, you know the company lawyers are gonna call them something different than they are=subject to more outsourcing.
Go ahead and vote yes..get ur 13%, and your loa fix, but hopefully this won't lead to furloughs. You and I both know that mgt has had a hard on for us pilots forever! Does a pig in lipstick ring a bell?
$195/hr. Skywest Rates? HAHAHAHA. Skywest pays $117/hr top rate. Delta has the E190s in their pay scales..$139/hr. Jetblue..$182. We top them all with this TA! Ace of Base.

The CS300 is already in the TA. Have you even looked at the TA?

The * says "includes the E2 variant". Big Deal. It is placed next to the E190 and E195. It means that the pay rate is the same for the E190/195 as the 190-E2/195-E2, their new variants. Again...have you actually read the TA or are you just going by cockpit blather?

Still don't see how this leads to furloughs. We buy em, we fly em. If they buy a NSNB, as defined by the UPA, they can get more 76 seaters, but UAX block hour ratios DECREASE, they do not increase...see page 4 of the UPA. This TA does not change that.

And this ain't the military, Sir. An FO can make more than a Captain. Rates are based on aircraft gross weight. Not rank. Our C2000 had FO rates greater than Captain rates.

Man. Click on this link and start watching/reading. Please don't be a clueless voter.

UAL Pilots > Contract Extension Webpage
jsled is offline  
Old 01-08-2016, 10:34 AM
  #158  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

I want to chime in one more time about the 'B Scale' in the TA. That steaming pile of bovine dung has been peddled by one person (and bobbleheaded by a few other NO voters). That's completely untrue.

A B Scale is a completely different pay rate table for doing the same job at the same company, entirely based on date of hire. The way the B Scale worked (example only using fictitious numbers) was that someone hired in 1984 would be paid $18/hr as a first year 727 FO (A Scale). Someone hired in 1985 had a completely separate pay rate chart which was less than anyone hired before him, so he was paid $12/hr as a first year 727 FO (B Scale). The A Scale and B Scale were to remain in effect forever ... top pay for a 747 Captain would be hypothetically $125/hr on the A Scale and $85/hr on the B Scale. Same company, only difference was the date of hire.
Andy is offline  
Old 01-08-2016, 11:16 AM
  #159  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Captain
Posts: 1,561
Default

This TA extension has 72 % yes all over the place.
All who wanted to vote casted their vote already .... 97% participation
And they will not change their vote.


Jan 22nd 10 am will be the announcement
And 23rd will be notarized .



Move on people
Sniper66 is offline  
Old 01-08-2016, 12:56 PM
  #160  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: Left
Posts: 1,823
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck D
No expert on the C-Series - but I have to say, despite it being an incredible aircraft on-paper, BBD had a pretty poor reputation on the line at a former airline for their efforts to work through the many maintenance kinks and generally supporting the Q400 program. Add to that, the C-Series has been on life support for a while - that can't be good for a prospective buyer's confidence. But I agree - if we do get them and the program is running smoothly (two big if's!), the 100 and 300 sound like good long-term airframes to operate.
I have had mixed experience with CRJs and associated support as well. However, the C-Series is another animal. Recall that the delay was largely caused by an engine issue unrelated to Bombardier. The airplane stood idle for 6 months (full salaries) while they worked on the engine issue.

Regardless, the performance of the C-Series line is far more impressive than what Embraer can provide at this point. This airplane is extremely versatile (Hawaii capable from the West Coast), Eco-friendly and passenger friendly. Up front, you are sitting in a wide cockpit with sidesticks, huge windows for visibility, auto throttles and a Collins Pro Line Fusion system with synthetic vision found in the latest Global Express Bizjet. This ain't a bigger CRJ or Q400.

The thing to remember is that Bombardier needs a big deal - UAL has the leverage in any negotiation. With the Republic slots available, UAL could probably pick them up for cheap. Once SWISS takes its first airplanes soon, other airlines will show more interest.

Last edited by David Puddy; 01-08-2016 at 01:07 PM.
David Puddy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ToiletDuck
Money Talk
28
12-12-2018 04:24 AM
misterwl
American
0
06-27-2012 09:48 AM
alfaromeo
Major
30
11-11-2009 06:40 PM
hangaber
Major
5
07-09-2008 07:04 PM
Blue 2
Hangar Talk
2
06-28-2005 05:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices