Search

Notices

Contract extension

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2015, 04:14 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ugleeual's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 767/757 CA
Posts: 2,701
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
...albeit on a different board, management never copied posts to use them against the pilot group in a lawsuit.
Expressing our opinions on various contract areas is a lot different than the idiots who attempted to organize a sick out on united pilots forum... I think we all understand this board is public... At least the smart ones.
ugleeual is offline  
Old 11-03-2015, 05:50 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

You're right, one cost us all money and jobs while the other a select few for a period of time. Public or private/public, the company still gets a sentiment making that 50+1 all the easier.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 11-03-2015, 06:55 PM
  #43  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 34
Default

Originally Posted by Regularguy
I'm not against web discussions about contract negotiations, but it is true they, Company, do look at them.

But more importantly they keep accurate records of contractural waving, disregard and other metrics to support their requests.
Good, then fix all the **** that they agreed to in 2012 that still has not been implememnted completely and all of the other irritants first, then we'll listen. Otherwise see you @ sec 6 openers.

Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 11-04-2015 at 01:31 AM. Reason: TOU
doober is offline  
Old 11-03-2015, 11:51 PM
  #44  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

Originally Posted by doober
Good, then fix all the **** that they agreed to in 2012 that still has not been implememnted completely and all of the other irritants first, then we'll listen. Otherwise see you @ sec 6 openers.
Sorry man, I just don't get it. They haven't complied with the last contract, so we are going to show them, by negotiating harder? And, gosh darnit, we aren't going to accept pay raises to extend the contract for 2 years.

That'll show 'em.

Just to show them, I am going all out, and am going to hold my breath until I turn purple. They won't have any option other than caving in to full contract negotiations.

I really, really don't understand the logic here. Sorry for the sarcasm.

Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 11-04-2015 at 01:31 AM. Reason: TOU Quote
Probe is offline  
Old 11-04-2015, 06:41 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Here are some salient points to consider:

1. We fought for and paid for our last contract to be negotiated

2. We continue to fight for current enforcement of the contract. While this is normal and standard practice for labor unions, it does seem rather odd at the both the volume of grievances and their expense.

3. The sections of the current contract that require constant surveillance and vigilance in enforcement are not cheap. However, the awards to the pilot are pennies on the dollar. This amount of enforcement activity has not served as a deterrent to the company for violating the contract.

Some questions to consider:

1. If the Europeans succeed in essentially abrogating all US Airline Contracts by shoving their interpretation of "open skies" down our throats and both the US Government and ALPA fail to protect our careers what is the current contract worth? What is an extension worth? What is a new contract worth? How much time does it buy us before the entire bottom falls out of the US airline industry and everyone from SWA to DAl to UAL nullifies our agreements.

2. What aproach gives us the most bang for the buck, extension or new contract?

3. Is ALPA considering drastic changes in the entire document, or just looking to solidify current book and incorporate grievance awards and other subsequent LOA's into the agreement?

4. What are the companies goals and motivations behind an extension?
baseball is offline  
Old 11-04-2015, 06:42 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Has contract compliance and enforcement been better/worse with Jackson Martin and Tom Stivala out of the picture?
baseball is offline  
Old 11-04-2015, 06:49 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lambourne's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 844
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
Sorry man, I just don't get it. They haven't complied with the last contract, so we are going to show them, by negotiating harder? And, gosh darnit, we aren't going to accept pay raises to extend the contract for 2 years.

That'll show 'em.

Just to show them, I am going all out, and am going to hold my breath until I turn purple. They won't have any option other than caving in to full contract negotiations.

I really, really don't understand the logic here. Sorry for the sarcasm.

Out of curiosity what parts of the contract are not being complied with currently?
Lambourne is offline  
Old 11-04-2015, 07:03 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

There were 'only' 36 grievances filed in the 3rd qtr. So yes, we have a compliance problem. We also have leverage to extract some coin and make the furlough longevity issue right. Show me the money.
jsled is offline  
Old 11-04-2015, 07:48 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lambourne's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 844
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
There were 'only' 36 grievances filed in the 3rd qtr. So yes, we have a compliance problem. We also have leverage to extract some coin and make the furlough longevity issue right. Show me the money.
Aren't grievances often not won? It's not like we are provided a run down by ALPA of each grievance that is filed and the outcome. Those could be for anything from an unapproved expense report to a pickup time dispute. Hardly mass non compliance.

The inference is large sections of the agreement aren't being complied with. Wouldn't those create group grievances? I'm curious as to what sections are not in compliance. Wouldn't the MEC and LEC be alerting the rank and file to these non compliant sections?
Lambourne is offline  
Old 11-04-2015, 08:18 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 112
Default

Originally Posted by Lambourne
Out of curiosity what parts of the contract are not being complied with currently?
Quite a few. You must not be on reserve
FlyHIGHgoFAST is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
maddogpyrat
FedEx
18
10-07-2015 02:29 PM
nwa757
American
178
01-10-2015 10:54 AM
dvhighdrive88
American
139
01-06-2015 08:05 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices