Search

Notices

320 vs 737

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-17-2015, 07:13 AM
  #11  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 44
Default

Sent you a pm
rwthompson67 is offline  
Old 07-19-2015, 11:43 AM
  #12  
Line Holder
 
10Lover's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Position: Right seat on The Bus
Posts: 61
Default

So, it sounds pretty accepted that the 'bus is quieter and more comfortable. Any insight on the life of an EWR new hire in each (I assume gettinbumped was talking exclusively about life at SFO?)? Slightly shorter legs on the 320 - does that translate into more days away from home on that vs. the 737? Is the 73 more hub-hub while you'll see more outstations on the 320? Better/worse overnights?

Thanks!
10Lover is offline  
Old 07-19-2015, 12:00 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Gets weekends off
Posts: 1,168
Default

Originally Posted by 10Lover
So, it sounds pretty accepted that the 'bus is quieter and more comfortable. Any insight on the life of an EWR new hire in each (I assume gettinbumped was talking exclusively about life at SFO?)? Slightly shorter legs on the 320 - does that translate into more days away from home on that vs. the 737? Is the 73 more hub-hub while you'll see more outstations on the 320? Better/worse overnights?

Thanks!
The latest SSC info states that both the bus and guppy fleets are within a minute or two of each other for hours/day. Its more going to matter which base, and what your seniority is. But the fleets themselves are both about 5:27 per day average for lineholders.
pilot64golfer is offline  
Old 07-19-2015, 12:05 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
130drvr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Bus
Posts: 768
Default

Originally Posted by 10Lover
So, it sounds pretty accepted that the 'bus is quieter and more comfortable. Any insight on the life of an EWR new hire in each (I assume gettinbumped was talking exclusively about life at SFO?)? Slightly shorter legs on the 320 - does that translate into more days away from home on that vs. the 737? Is the 73 more hub-hub while you'll see more outstations on the 320? Better/worse overnights?

Thanks!
737 EWR flying has the best flying in the company IMO. Carribean beach layovers, transcons, 16-17 days off for jr line holders. I commute on the Bus and think it would be a nicer plane to fly but the QOL on the 737 helps to outweigh the plane itself. I would love to transfer to LA or SF for easier commute, but they have tons of red eyes with min days off.
130drvr is offline  
Old 07-19-2015, 12:08 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: CA
Posts: 1,226
Default

Originally Posted by 130drvr
737 EWR flying has the best flying in the company IMO. Carribean beach layovers, transcons, 16-17 days off for jr line holders. I commute on the Bus and think it would be a nicer plane to fly but the QOL on the 737 helps to outweigh the plane itself. I would love to transfer to LA or SF for easier commute, but they have tons of red eyes with min days off.
16-17 off typically for jr line holders even in the summer? I know summer tends to be some of the worst months for days off. Did you mean for most of the year excluding the usual culprits Jul/Aug/Dec?
Softpayman is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 09:18 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
130drvr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Bus
Posts: 768
Default

Yeah, closer to 15 off in summer
130drvr is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 09:56 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
duvie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: WB Bunkie
Posts: 1,246
Default

For the new guys, don't judge all-nighters AKA red-eyes, till you try them. I was pretty wary as a former regional dude, but if you live in the Pacific Time zone, the 4 to 5 hour all nighters are really not that bad. You start on day one after 9 PM which is almost like having an additional day off and have the full four day trip to get back to normal sleep. The tough part about the 737 out west right now, is that some trips have two all nighters which can be kind of tough....

As with anything, some guys have a harder time than others. I try to take a two hour nap the day of the redeye, get about four hours sleep when I get to the hotel and then do a light workout and eat well that day. Usually I sleep like a baby on night two and wake up feeling at least 90%. By the time I get home I feel fine.
duvie is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 01:34 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
Default

The best answer is 737. Why? Because we have a bunch of them and that means more opportunities.

Now some took the debate to other areas.

Training. It seems there is almost universal agreement, UAL 737 is at the minimum level required by the FAA. It should be getting better as things move to Denver.

Cockpit. Airbus by a long shot is better.

Which is more quirky? It used to be the Airbus but with the -900 and "Max" I think it's a tie now.
Regularguy is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 01:36 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
Default

The only way to fly "red eyes" is on an airplane with a real bunk and an extra pilot.
Regularguy is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 01:41 PM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
10Lover's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Position: Right seat on The Bus
Posts: 61
Default

No issue here with red eyes....are those mostly west-coast, or do EWR crews fly those? Again, are they mostly restricted to the 737 due to legs, or does the Airbus fly them as well?
10Lover is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Technical
4
10-31-2010 01:43 AM
Clinton
Flight Schools and Training
1
04-30-2010 11:34 AM
tortue
Major
26
10-30-2009 09:09 AM
1Seat 1Engine
Major
11
06-15-2007 05:20 AM
SWAjet
Major
2
07-22-2005 04:51 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices