Search

Notices

Vacancy Bid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-15-2015, 08:03 AM
  #161  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 303
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
BFD,

Some here are spring loaded to assume that ANY critique, no mater how valid and fact based are a direct affront to the pilots of LCAL. Roll with it, you jumbonaut brain surgeon you.
Valid and fact based?

He makes a broad brush statement and then states he had one instructor replaced...one...and that is valid and "fact based??" Sorry, sounds very subjective and not objective IMO.

Everyone has their own levels of comfort, I respect that. I went through the almighty TK recently and I've been through Houston as well. Both were good programs and both had a couple of weaker instructors and some great instructors. Both were very similar IMO. In the end, I learned a lot from both and enjoyed them.

That's my valid and "fact-based" opinion.
Scrappy is offline  
Old 07-15-2015, 08:15 AM
  #162  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

Fair enough. My statement wasn't really aimed at you, but yours was a good retort. I've just really grown tired of the carping going on here and the other forum. Both are a poor indictment of where the combined group is, years after the merger. I'm trying to lower my expectations in advance for the next TA as a result. Sorry if I ruffled your feathers.
oldmako is offline  
Old 07-15-2015, 08:22 AM
  #163  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Position: next to chronic complainers...
Posts: 364
Default

Originally Posted by CousinEddie
I recall an American pilot pointing out post 2002 that AA management had told APA that if they had the 2002 CAL contract at American, they could operate AA with about 1,000 fewer pilots.

No need for you to jump in on this Sleeves, given the contract you operated under that wasn't even the result of the CH11 process.

AA contract was design to be supper inefficient for AA, so APA can have more pilots on the property. Example; B757, B767 separate fleets, international and domestic flying based on seniority. Sometimes you have to ask yourself is this makes sense? Many pilots are conservative and advocate against government inefficiency, unnecessary stuffing, wasteful spending, pushing for competition driven approach to government; however, when it comes to their own turf, majority becomes worst then chairman of polit-bureau in Soviet Union; becoming active union members, protectionists, etc, totally opposite to their own political views. We have to always seek for a healthy balance; an airline that operates profitably and efficiently, and shares portion of their profits with people that makes it happens. Upper management will always find ways to balance the books, all they have to do is declare Ch.13. and furlough, cut contracts. Overstuffing the airlines, just because times are good and we can push for it, is unfair to junior pilots hired at the tail end, giving them false hopes for careers that does not exist. Contracts should always have some wiggle room and be flexible enough to manage through tough times, allowing to manage and protect jobs. I'll probably get flamed for that, but what's the point of free and open discussion if we can speak our minds.
jetlink is offline  
Old 07-15-2015, 08:25 AM
  #164  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 303
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
Fair enough. My statement wasn't really aimed at you, but yours was a good retort. I've just really grown tired of the carping going on here and the other forum. Both are a poor indictment of where the combined group is, years after the merger. I'm trying to lower my expectations in advance for the next TA as a result. Sorry if I ruffled your feathers.
No feathers ruffled here. I just think your statement was disenguine...there was obviously no "fact basis" on the prior post and it was a blatant broad brush statement. All subjection, no objection. Lots of emotion, little fact or substance. Everyone responds to different training with different levels of succession. I tend to like learning more on my own initially and ask questions after (more like Houston). Some like more classroom instruction (ala TK). And don't even get me started on the haenious 1980s 76T CBTs they have at TK (which are actually incorrect and not updated) on certain systems. Now that is agregious...and that is definitely "fact based."
Scrappy is offline  
Old 07-15-2015, 08:32 AM
  #165  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,726
Default

There will be no more Houston training center in a couple of years and the 76T is fast disappearing. Once all training is consolidated there will be a more uniform method across fleets. Right now the edges are frazzled.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 07-15-2015, 08:57 AM
  #166  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CousinEddie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,085
Default

Originally Posted by jetlink
AA contract was design to be supper inefficient for AA, so APA can have more pilots on the property. Example; B757, B767 separate fleets, international and domestic flying based on seniority. Sometimes you have to ask yourself is this makes sense? Many pilots are conservative and advocate against government inefficiency, unnecessary stuffing, wasteful spending, pushing for competition driven approach to government; however, when it comes to their own turf, majority becomes worst then chairman of polit-bureau in Soviet Union; becoming active union members, protectionists, etc, totally opposite to their own political views. We have to always seek for a healthy balance; an airline that operates profitably and efficiently, and shares portion of their profits with people that makes it happens. Upper management will always find ways to balance the books, all they have to do is declare Ch.13. and furlough, cut contracts. Overstuffing the airlines, just because times are good and we can push for it, is unfair to junior pilots hired at the tail end, giving them false hopes for careers that does not exist. Contracts should always have some wiggle room and be flexible enough to manage through tough times, allowing to manage and protect jobs. I'll probably get flamed for that, but what's the point of free and open discussion if we can speak our minds.
Agreed. The APA contract was an example of manpower positive. CAL 2002 and any of BK contracts were manpower negative. Andy seems to think that pilots were continuously and deliberately behaving in a way that kept him on the street. I don't agree with him. Sorry he feels that way.
CousinEddie is offline  
Old 07-15-2015, 09:04 AM
  #167  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 303
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss
There will be no more Houston training center in a couple of years and the 76T is fast disappearing. Once all training is consolidated there will be a more uniform method across fleets. Right now the edges are frazzled.
I'd say EXTREMELY frazzled on the 76T and their academics at TK. However not at all the lual pilot's fault and I get that. And not taking away from the quality instructors. Both at TK on the 76T and on the 737 at Houston.
Scrappy is offline  
Old 07-15-2015, 11:55 AM
  #168  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 737 fo
Posts: 908
Default

Originally Posted by bigfatdaddy
You are not kidding about the 737 training in Houston.....worst training program I have ever taken. Largely had to train myself...emphasis is on hazing and harrassement rather than training. Hopefully that old-school "harrasment is good for you" culture will be replaced by a healthier one going forward.
Originally Posted by bigfatdaddy
Totally missed my point....Hazing and harrassment are unprofessional...that is what I was talking about.
Originally Posted by bigfatdaddy
I did not intend my post as a slight to the admirable men and women on the 737 fleet (Which there are many). The intent was to warn any newer folks that the Houston training center ( more appropriately the "evaluation center) was not an experience to be taken lightly...come prepared to do battle! To dragon...who still seems to think I need bucking up and a dose of (unnecessary) advice, the 737 is not my 1st fleet at this company, but is certainly administered differently than the others. We should be united as one pilot group, one airline and One training method. Time will sort all of this out I am sure.

pls know that I am united with all of our pilots in making this the best possible work place for our future.
BFD
Originally Posted by bigfatdaddy
That is not what I said at all.....the incidents were dealt with....union called....instructor replaced....done. You can take what I posted at face value, or insert your own bias.
I am trying to take what you said at face value.... You stated you were hazed and harassed. I asked for examples as that is a pretty big statement and unacceptable if true.
sleeves is offline  
Old 07-15-2015, 12:06 PM
  #169  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 737 fo
Posts: 908
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
Fair enough. My statement wasn't really aimed at you, but yours was a good retort. I've just really grown tired of the carping going on here and the other forum. Both are a poor indictment of where the combined group is, years after the merger. I'm trying to lower my expectations in advance for the next TA as a result. Sorry if I ruffled your feathers.
You reap what you sow comes to mind. It seems that hacking on anything or anyone LCAL is fair game around here but any retort is clearly not welcome and meet with a unity lecture.
sleeves is offline  
Old 07-15-2015, 12:38 PM
  #170  
Gets Weekends Off
 
duvie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: WB Bunkie
Posts: 1,246
Default

Subjectively and slightly hyperbolically speaking, I enjoyed my time at both north and south, but the training center in IAH felt a little more like sink or swim and Denver was a little too spoon fed. YMMV
duvie is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Peterborg
American
4
02-12-2015 03:36 PM
Pilot7
Regional
65
12-12-2013 09:52 PM
pilotgolfer
United
45
02-10-2013 11:08 PM
ERJ135
Regional
43
07-21-2008 07:49 PM
Diesel 10
Cargo
1
08-12-2005 12:59 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices