Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Houston, you have a problem? >

Houston, you have a problem?

Search

Notices

Houston, you have a problem?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2015, 03:43 PM
  #131  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Shrek's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,872
Default

Originally Posted by sleeves
I agree that the 747 deal was a mistake. All that I have been pointing out on this thread is that it is hypocritical to give it to some and not to others, and that giving it to those pilots will go a long way in preventing them from coming back with vacancies quickly and replacing these guys ( flush bid) type of senario. Also, I feel there is a lot of LUAL people out to get the JR. LCAL Capt. I am even more sure of it after having participated in this thread.
There is no conspiracy theory - we all just need to use the active seniority list for all vacancies since it became an official list period.

But it IS laughable that of those jr captains think that since they got the bid it wouldn't have a chance to change during the course of their careers in this industry.

Look at what reality is TODAY anything else will drive you nuts.
Shrek is offline  
Old 05-23-2015, 04:34 PM
  #132  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

The company made the disastrous decision to merge the two airlines fleets right after the merger, without having contracts in place to merge the labor groups. Mostly lCAL planes into lUAL bases, although they did put some airbuses and 76T's into IAH. I think it was about 4-1 or more lCAL pilots into lUAL bases vs the opposite.

The net result was a loss of flying by the respective legacy base aircraft. 3 years of massive DHing crews, both pilots, FA's, and mechanics followed, and still continue. Just look at the PS DHers on flights between hubs. It is a disaster.

They already bumped out of DEN and ORD, with IAH to follow. They are not even close to sorting out the pilots, and have not even begun the process with the FA's.

It is a complete cluster*&^%.

I am sorry for the negative effect on the lives of IAH pilots, but this is aviation. These pilots should not have been trained in the first place. That is all water under the bridge, but now the water is flowing OVER the bridge and the effected pilots are not going to like it.

Welcome to the big leagues.
Probe is offline  
Old 05-23-2015, 04:53 PM
  #133  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 737 fo
Posts: 908
Default

Originally Posted by Birddog
So Sleeves,

Tell me why the company would go to the trouble and expense of creating a flush bid to displace junior pilots so more senior pilots can then immediately fill those positions?

Dogg
The company does many things that are wack! I know that many on the LCAL side know that Flight Opps MGT and the Union Leadership is now almost exclusively LUAL. This combine with the angst towards (as demonstrated on this thread) the 14-02 bidders could be a reason. Even someone as "thick" as me can see the possibilities.
sleeves is offline  
Old 05-23-2015, 04:54 PM
  #134  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CousinEddie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,085
Default

Originally Posted by sleeves
I agree that the 747 deal was a mistake. All that I have been pointing out on this thread is that it is hypocritical to give it to some and not to others, and that giving it to those pilots will go a long way in preventing them from coming back with vacancies quickly and replacing these guys ( flush bid) type of senario. Also, I feel there is a lot of LUAL people out to get the JR. LCAL Capt. I am even more sure of it after having participated in this thread.
Come on Sleeves. Do you really take anything off of this forum as indicative of the overall feeling out on the line?

I talked with a guy I knew from years ago that is today a 2005 hire in the left seat. I told him I did not want to see him bumped. Period. However, I also told him that I did not admire his endless reserve situation either. In other words, I would not trade with him.

I think that is far more representative of the attitude on the line. I for one am still not desperate to be a junior captain, as my (and many others at my seniority level) recent bids indicated.
CousinEddie is offline  
Old 05-23-2015, 04:59 PM
  #135  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 737 fo
Posts: 908
Default

Originally Posted by Shrek
There is no conspiracy theory - we all just need to use the active seniority list for all vacancies since it became an official list period.

But it IS laughable that of those jr captains think that since they got the bid it wouldn't have a chance to change during the course of their careers in this industry.

Look at what reality is TODAY anything else will drive you nuts.
I doubt anyone does not see valid possibilities removing them from a JR. Position. They have a problem with someone scheming to remove them. This would remove that stigma.
sleeves is offline  
Old 05-23-2015, 05:04 PM
  #136  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

When does section 6 open?
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 05-23-2015, 05:15 PM
  #137  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 737 fo
Posts: 908
Default

Originally Posted by CousinEddie
Come on Sleeves. Do you really take anything off of this forum as indicative of the overall feeling out on the line?

I talked with a guy I knew from years ago that is today a 2005 hire in the left seat. I told him I did not want to see him bumped. Period. However, I also told him that I did not admire his endless reserve situation either. In other words, I would not trade with him.

I think that is far more representative of the attitude on the line. I for one am still not desperate to be a junior captain, as my (and many others at my seniority level) recent bids indicated.
If they are such undesirable positions, why all the angst over this protection or 14-02 in general?
Although I do agree as I have personally been avoiding anything that even goes through, let alone being based in IAH for decades.
sleeves is offline  
Old 05-23-2015, 05:40 PM
  #138  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CousinEddie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,085
Default

Originally Posted by sleeves
If they are such undesirable positions, why all the angst over this protection or 14-02 in general?
Just because you are LUAL and you don't agree with what Ben is up to in IAH doesn't mean you are "out to get" Junior LCAL captains.

I would have been opposed to a similar deal being attempted for say the DEN 320 fleet. I'm not out to get them either.

What are you preaching to the new hires you fly with anyway? Makes me wonder if they go home afterwards and dust off their Delta paperwork.
CousinEddie is offline  
Old 05-23-2015, 06:55 PM
  #139  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 168
Default

Originally Posted by sleeves
The company does many things that are wack! I know that many on the LCAL side know that Flight Opps MGT and the Union Leadership is now almost exclusively LUAL. This combine with the angst towards (as demonstrated on this thread) the 14-02 bidders could be a reason. Even someone as "thick" as me can see the possibilities.
Your conspiracy theories don't even make sense. Sure OK UAL MEC leadership is mostly former L-UA. Flight Ops I have no idea, maybe you can give me a lineup. It matters not because if you knew anything about the company you work for you'd know that Flight Ops has little to do with manning decisions like this. Network Planning decides the routes and aircraft headed by Brian Znotins (L-CA). Then the NOC puts the pilots where they are supposed to be headed by Tracy Lee (L-CA). The person immediately responsible for this is Herve Lavenant (L-CA). So Brian, Tracy and Herve are going to team up with with the L-UA dominated UAL MEC to stick it to the junior IAH 737 CAs? Right, I'm sure they conspire like this all the time.

Let me tell you about the 14-02 bidders. Hang on. Nobody cares. L-UA pilots don't care about that stuff. The only time it comes up is when cry babies like yourself come up with these fantastic conspiracies theories and you need to attempt to substantiate them.

You really need to seek professional help.

Dogg

Last edited by Birddog; 05-23-2015 at 07:13 PM.
Birddog is offline  
Old 05-23-2015, 06:57 PM
  #140  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 737 fo
Posts: 908
Default

Originally Posted by CousinEddie

What are you preaching to the new hires you fly with anyway? Makes me wonder if they go home afterwards and dust off their Delta paperwork.
About IAH? I have been telling people for years to move down to IAH. You can buy a huge house for 200,000 ...and sell it 10 years later for 160,000.

If you are insinuating people are leaving here for Delta to avoid me.... I think I did them a favor.
sleeves is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kasserine06
Military
25
03-20-2009 03:04 AM
MaydayMark
Cargo
2
03-11-2009 11:04 AM
vagabond
Technical
4
12-31-2008 04:13 PM
Chris
Flight Schools and Training
14
12-21-2008 03:08 AM
Airsupport
Regional
14
09-12-2008 08:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices