Search

Notices

1509v

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2015, 10:08 AM
  #121  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 168
Default

Originally Posted by gettinbumped
What special deal are you talking about? Grandfather rights are covered in the CBA
He's referencing UPA MOU 14. Twenty-four month grandfather for the ORD/LAX -400 pilots and SEA 777 pilots. Unfortunately I could argue whether or not the comparison is valid either way.
Birddog is offline  
Old 05-03-2015, 10:57 AM
  #122  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 737 fo
Posts: 908
Default

Originally Posted by Birddog
He's referencing UPA MOU 14. Twenty-four month grandfather for the ORD/LAX -400 pilots and SEA 777 pilots. Unfortunately I could argue whether or not the comparison is valid either way.
Yes, except I am not sure it applied to the SEA 777. I agree with you, I could argue either way. Is this what Ben is asking for?
sleeves is offline  
Old 05-03-2015, 12:23 PM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bottoms up's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Position: non reclining seat
Posts: 447
Default

Not sure who did/did not attend IAH town hall meeting. I snuck in there b/c I thought there would be filet mignon for everyone. Disappointed to say the least not even PB&J, but I stuck around to hear what was being said

Summary from Howard, Greg, Beau, and Tracy (scheduling)
With oil down flights into IAH are down some 20%. They are going to shift to that flying to other bases after summer. ORD, SFO, IAD
Each captain displaced equates to 5 training cycles. They value that around 30 grand a cycle so 150 grand per captain. They recoup that after 4-6 months.
Didn't get a specific on number of displacements. Only captain more than f/o. Also they don't want to over displace so IAH may not receive the heft that everyone thinks.

Lots of talk about moral and how SRM was rampant every day. No need to displace due to attrition and vacanccy bids and hiring etc..maybe TDY temporarily or something as I think Den has 320 guys being tdy'd into base after they displaced. Few guys pretty vocal and upset. Even a nice 10 minute one ranging from uniforms to pay stubs.

Howard said something about putting out an email with all info and numbers as they want to be transparent as possible.

That was the majority of it. Minus the steaks.
bottoms up is offline  
Old 05-03-2015, 12:24 PM
  #124  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 168
Default

Originally Posted by sleeves
Yes, except I am not sure it applied to the SEA 777. I agree with you, I could argue either way. Is this what Ben is asking for?
No idea, but wouldn't surprise me.
Birddog is offline  
Old 05-03-2015, 01:45 PM
  #125  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by bottoms up
Summary from Howard, Greg, Beau, and Tracy (scheduling)
With oil down flights into IAH are down some 20%.
I assume that's O&D (origin and destination) traffic. I got grilled here a few weeks ago for stating that traffic would be down in IAH this year and that Houston is in a regional recession. On this thread: http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/ua...on-answer.html

That big a drop in passenger traffic indicates local recession to me, but others can interpret it how they like. That's more than double the drop in traffic that I had expected.

My sympathies to those based in IAH; uncertainty about one's future sucks. It sounds like they're not planning on doing a 'one and done' displacement; more likely it will be several small displacements. With all of the vacancies, I would anticipate the company to try to attrit out as many excess pilots as possible. Training's running at full capacity so there's no incentive to accelerate displacements. At the same time, since a lot of IAH pilots will try to displace into other IAH fleets/seats, there will probably be limited vacancies in all IAH fleets for a while. Good luck to everyone in IAH.

Originally Posted by bottoms up
Lots of talk about moral and how SRM was rampant every day. No need to displace due to attrition and vacanccy bids and hiring etc..maybe TDY temporarily or something as I think Den has 320 guys being tdy'd into base after they displaced. Few guys pretty vocal and upset. Even a nice 10 minute one ranging from uniforms to pay stubs.

Howard said something about putting out an email with all info and numbers as they want to be transparent as possible.
We're paid to move metal, not solve management issues. Management's looking at this in terms of dollars and trying to minimize costs - they're not doing this just to screw with people. Think of it this way - if they minimize costs, it means a bigger profit sharing check for everyone. (trying to put a positive spin on this)

Howard - I know a lot of people don't like him, but I've always had the impression that he's a straight shooter. I'd rather be told bad news than given a BS story.
Andy is offline  
Old 05-03-2015, 03:02 PM
  #126  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
Default

Originally Posted by sleeves
Yes, except I am not sure it applied to the SEA 777. I agree with you, I could argue either way. Is this what Ben is asking for?
Not sure about the SFO/LAX 747 but the ORD 747 closing/opening would have effectively been a FLUSH without the LOA grandfather rights.

The Houston surplus is just that a surplus. A carve-out that gives SUPER SENIORITY is a bad precedence and violates the seniority of all United pilots.
AllenAllert is offline  
Old 05-03-2015, 05:12 PM
  #127  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Default

Originally Posted by Birddog
He's referencing UPA MOU 14. Twenty-four month grandfather for the ORD/LAX -400 pilots and SEA 777 pilots. Unfortunately I could argue whether or not the comparison is valid either way.
Ahhhh I see. Yeah base closures vs merely bumping. I've never seen the 24 months applied to any regular bump out of a base that still exists, but I guess Ben can try to make an exception to save his own seat. But to get indignant at the MEC and management for lacking enthusiasm in his carve out plan is, well.... I didn't see him getting all bent at the multiple bumps from DEN, ORD, or base closures in SEA and LAX. The whole thing smells. Hopefully the bumps will be minimal. They suck. Unfortunately I know from experience several times
gettinbumped is offline  
Old 05-03-2015, 05:25 PM
  #128  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,726
Default

When I get bumped in August of this year off the 757 in Denver it will be bump number 5 for me. 777F/O surplussed to 757F/O to 737F/O back up to 777 F/O surplussed to 320 F/O, upgraded to 320 CA,surplussed to 757 F/O surplussed to whatever is next.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 05-03-2015, 06:12 PM
  #129  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 737 fo
Posts: 908
Default

Originally Posted by AllenAllert
Not sure about the SFO/LAX 747 but the ORD 747 closing/opening would have effectively been a FLUSH without the LOA grandfather rights.

The Houston surplus is just that a surplus. A carve-out that gives SUPER SENIORITY is a bad precedence and violates the seniority of all United pilots.
This is just as much a flush as the 747 deal was or was not. It's just one is done to LUAL and the other is done to LCAL. I don't think either should have been given special consideration.
sleeves is offline  
Old 05-03-2015, 06:16 PM
  #130  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 44
Default

Originally Posted by sleeves
This is just as much a flush as the 747 deal was or was not. It's just one is done to LUAL and the other is done to LCAL. I don't think either should have been given special consideration.
How is a complete closure of one base the same as surplussing a small percentage of pilots in another base?
rwthompson67 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices