Used Airbii ??
09-05-2015, 12:31 PM
#151
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
You might want to reference 1-C-1-g, and 1-L-25.
09-05-2015, 03:28 PM
#152
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
U...nited scope choke baby. Da da da da da da da da.
Vanilla Sled
09-05-2015, 03:36 PM
#153
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,725
Complete and total bovine scatology.
09-05-2015, 08:37 PM
#154
Moderate Moderator
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Roger - 1-C-1-g "up to 325" with restrictions.
My point on 1-L-25 is that we have pay rates for the CS300 in section 3, scope defines new small narrow body as the CS100 (not the CS300). Adding a CS300 doesn't comply with scope, and we don't have rates for the the CS100 which does.
Finally, thanks to the moderator for breaking the "post boob pictures" seal on this thread.
My point on 1-L-25 is that we have pay rates for the CS300 in section 3, scope defines new small narrow body as the CS100 (not the CS300). Adding a CS300 doesn't comply with scope, and we don't have rates for the the CS100 which does.
Finally, thanks to the moderator for breaking the "post boob pictures" seal on this thread.
Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 09-05-2015 at 09:23 PM.
09-06-2015, 10:16 AM
#157
Pilot Response
Joined APC: May 2011
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 479
Have either of those completed (or even started) flight test?
09-06-2015, 10:36 AM
#158
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
The E175 is currently in service with United Express.
The C-Series is about 80% of the way through fight test according to Bombardier.
The C-Series is about 80% of the way through fight test according to Bombardier.
Last edited by cadetdrivr; 09-06-2015 at 10:51 AM.
09-06-2015, 10:46 AM
#159
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 383
I have wondered about the C-series and UAL for a while. Republic has orders for the C-series and needs to get out of the deliveries and bombardier needs to keep those deliveries and they have stated publicly that they want 300 firm by the first delivery. They have a new management team that might be willing to wheel and deal more so than the last. As jr pilot I hope this is true. As a realist I expect it to be just another rumor.
09-06-2015, 10:56 AM
#160
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 320 Captain
Posts: 655
That should be interesting. Per scope, the only way to increase 70/76 seat aircraft is to add CS100, E190, or E195 aircraft to UA mainline flying.
Section 3 only has pay rates for CS300 aircraft.
If they add CS300 aircraft, does that meet the scope choke growth requirements of section one? If they add CS100 series jets, I hope they plan to pay CS300 rates, or they can keep them parked until a pay rate is negotiated. I'd put that negotiation at the back of the line until after compliance with the current book is established.
Section 3 only has pay rates for CS300 aircraft.
If they add CS300 aircraft, does that meet the scope choke growth requirements of section one? If they add CS100 series jets, I hope they plan to pay CS300 rates, or they can keep them parked until a pay rate is negotiated. I'd put that negotiation at the back of the line until after compliance with the current book is established.
No planes will be parked just because there isn't a pay rate. That tactic sailed in 2000 with a side letter signed by Dubinsky. And current contract has it incorporated into 3-J.
3-J-2 Nothing set forth herein shall prevent the Company from introducing a new aircraft type into revenue service before agreement is reached over its pay rate and Equipment band, provided that the pay rates assigned to the new aircraft type are not less than the minimum rates provided in Section 3-A-1
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
