Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
United airlineapps addendum question >

United airlineapps addendum question

Search

Notices

United airlineapps addendum question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-2015, 06:07 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CenterlinePrep's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Interview Consulting
Posts: 230
Default

The UAL computer does not give you negative points for answering yes to this question, per the addendum. This is directly from UAL HR and is a fact. A human set of eyes looking at this question knows the difference between a felony, speeding ticket, etc.

Some may have gotten hired without listing their traffic tickets here, but again, the question states... "Have you ever paid a fine"

Without negative points being a factor, we advise our clients to list their PAID speeding tickets fines like the question states. It has not once been a factor in hindering an interview invite.

Centerline Interview Consulting
CenterlinePrep is offline  
Old 04-17-2015, 07:32 PM
  #22  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 7
Default

If you answer yes to this question, you will not get called. It has nothing to do with negative points, your app won't make it through at all. I made the same mistake and went down the rabbit hole thinking that a speeding ticket was a paid fine. It took a buddy in the training department to do some digging to find out why I wasn't getting called. Once I changed the answer I got called within a month. Its kinda like the Hogan test; don't over-think it.
raulduke is offline  
Old 04-17-2015, 08:52 PM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 48
Default

I had 3 traffic tickets. I put them in the main app and checked no on the addendum. Didn't come up during the interview at all.
KAFhelper is offline  
Old 04-18-2015, 12:24 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,785
Default

Originally Posted by CenterlinePrep
The interviewers could care less that you've paid a speeding ticket fine 15 years ago
Come on brotha', people pay you for your expertise and being able to be coached to phrase things PROPERLY. Attention to detail is IMPORTANT;

The expression I could not care less originally meant 'it would be impossible for me to care less than I do because I do not care at all'. It was originally a British saying and came to the US in the 1950s. It is senseless to transform it into the now-common I could care less. If you could care less, that means you care at least a little. The original is quite sarcastic and the other form is clearly nonsense. The inverted form I could care less was coined in the US and is found only here, recorded in print by 1966. The question is, something caused the negative to vanish even while the original form of the expression was still very much in vogue and available for comparison - so what was it? There are other American English expressions that have a similar sarcastic inversion of an apparent sense, such as Tell me about it!, which usually means 'Don't tell me about it, because I know all about it already'. The Yiddish I should be so lucky!, in which the real sense is often 'I have no hope of being so lucky', has a similar stress pattern with the same sarcastic inversion of meaning as does I could care less.
Urban Dictionary: I could care less
John Carr is offline  
Old 04-18-2015, 02:01 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Boeing, left side
Posts: 188
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr
Come on brotha', people pay you for your expertise and being able to be coached to phrase things PROPERLY. Attention to detail is IMPORTANT;



Urban Dictionary: I could care less

It's completely off the subject, but I'm glad someone else noticed this.
shroomwell is offline  
Old 04-18-2015, 02:46 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CenterlinePrep's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Interview Consulting
Posts: 230
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr
Come on brotha', people pay you for your expertise and being able to be coached to phrase things PROPERLY. Attention to detail is IMPORTANT;

The expression I could not care less originally meant 'it would be impossible for me to care less than I do because I do not care at all'. It was originally a British saying and came to the US in the 1950s. It is senseless to transform it into the now-common I could care less. If you could care less, that means you care at least a little. The original is quite sarcastic and the other form is clearly nonsense. The inverted form I could care less was coined in the US and is found only here, recorded in print by 1966. The question is, something caused the negative to vanish even while the original form of the expression was still very much in vogue and available for comparison - so what was it? There are other American English expressions that have a similar sarcastic inversion of an apparent sense, such as Tell me about it!, which usually means 'Don't tell me about it, because I know all about it already'. The Yiddish I should be so lucky!, in which the real sense is often 'I have no hope of being so lucky', has a similar stress pattern with the same sarcastic inversion of meaning as does I could care less.

Urban Dictionary: I could care less
Checking yes to this box is not the reason for getting denied an interview invite, it's as simple as that. This coming from United HR and from dozens of past clients who've listed their speeding tickets there.

John Carr. In your quote it says "could care less" means "you care a little". My response then was absolutely proper terminology. They could care less about a ticket 15 years. If the interviewers "couldn't care less" about speeding tickets at all, any questions about speeding tickets would be completely omitted from the entire application itself.

On that note, I do find the humor in some of your posts quite funny.

Centerline Interview Consulting
CenterlinePrep is offline  
Old 04-18-2015, 04:57 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 812
Default

Most traffic tickets are infractions and are not misdemeanors. DUI, hit and run, leaving scene of accident with personal injury or damage, ... you can see a distinct difference in severity when you look at what qualifies as a misdemeanor. They specifically tell you to come clean on anything to be found on your "criminal record" in the bolded note above this question. I get that people are trying to be honest but this is not the place to put traffic infractions.
Aquaticus is offline  
Old 04-18-2015, 06:42 AM
  #28  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 45
Default

Question. Under driving history what does Disposition refer to?
Thx
db1968 is offline  
Old 04-18-2015, 09:57 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,785
Default

Originally Posted by CenterlinePrep
Checking yes to this box is not the reason for getting denied an interview invite, it's as simple as that. This coming from United HR and from dozens of past clients who've listed their speeding tickets there.

John Carr. In your quote it says "could care less" means "you care a little". My response then was absolutely proper terminology. They could care less about a ticket 15 years. If the interviewers "couldn't care less" about speeding tickets at all, any questions about speeding tickets would be completely omitted from the entire application itself.

On that note, I do find the humor in some of your posts quite funny.

Centerline Interview Consulting
Sorry, I forgot to add the
John Carr is offline  
Old 04-18-2015, 01:54 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 353
Default

Originally Posted by db1968
Question. Under driving history what does Disposition refer to?
Thx
What was the outcome of the violation? "Paid Fine" or "Paid Fine; non-moving violation & no points" or if a violation was dismissed, put "Dismissed". If you got some sort of adjudication agreement, ie, "Dismissed after traffic school" I would put that as well.
WhisperJet is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gordon C
Air Wisconsin
10
06-11-2020 04:16 PM
EWRflyr
United
44
04-26-2014 06:07 AM
thor2j
United
78
04-13-2013 07:59 AM
T Dawg
United
9
09-19-2010 09:25 AM
Sir James
Major
0
05-08-2005 03:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices