Search

Notices

Vacancy 15-03V

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2014, 05:03 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by SOTeric
And why not? Both pilots fly the same number of passengers on a given flight. Makes perfect sense!
Where would you peg the new rate under a pay for seniority scheme?
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 10-06-2014, 05:45 AM
  #42  
You scratched my anchor
 
Al Czervik's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,948
Default

Is a pilot out on medical leave eligible to bid on a vacancy?
Al Czervik is offline  
Old 10-06-2014, 05:59 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by Al Czervik
Is a pilot out on medical leave eligible to bid on a vacancy?
Yes. According to sect 12-I-2, "The company shall allow access to ccs, or it's equivalent, to pilots on a leave of absence in order to allow them to...update their standing staffing bid, and input vacancy, displacement....bids."
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 10-06-2014, 06:29 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 281
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss
I don't know if you forgot the just kidding icon or you are being serious here ... A single pay band pays all F/O's one rate solely based on longevity no matter what equipment they are on. Same for captains.
Not kidding ... why would this be bad?
SEDPA is offline  
Old 10-06-2014, 07:18 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by SEDPA
Not kidding ... why would this be bad?
Please tell which group will subsidize the pay increases for the NB pilots? It all sounds good until you have to produce answers in the face of a company that would laugh at the thought of $250/177 for all seats. Anything less and you are disenfranchising a large population of the pilot group.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 10-06-2014, 07:53 AM
  #46  
You scratched my anchor
 
Al Czervik's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
Yes. According to sect 12-I-2, "The company shall allow access to ccs, or it's equivalent, to pilots on a leave of absence in order to allow them to...update their standing staffing bid, and input vacancy, displacement....bids."
Thanks!!!!
Al Czervik is offline  
Old 10-06-2014, 08:27 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 281
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
Please tell which group will subsidize the pay increases for the NB pilots? It all sounds good until you have to produce answers in the face of a company that would laugh at the thought of $250/177 for all seats. Anything less and you are disenfranchising a large population of the pilot group.
I get that ... any change in the status quo means robbing Peter to pay Paul ... one could argue that had we not gone down this road of tying pay to size, err "productivity", then perhaps we all would be making more money .... so maybe the senior bubbas have been stealing from the less senior bubbas this whole time? As a UNION, we should be looking out for everyone, not just the senior ones. I'd much rather bid equipment for QOL rather than for $$$$.
SEDPA is offline  
Old 10-06-2014, 09:10 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Gets weekends off
Posts: 1,168
Default

Originally Posted by SEDPA
I get that ... any change in the status quo means robbing Peter to pay Paul ... one could argue that had we not gone down this road of tying pay to size, err "productivity", then perhaps we all would be making more money .... so maybe the senior bubbas have been stealing from the less senior bubbas this whole time? As a UNION, we should be looking out for everyone, not just the senior ones. I'd much rather bid equipment for QOL rather than for $$$$.
Its not that. Senior people have waited their turn. Now they want to be paid for the senior equipment, not just give it up so more junior pilots can make more money.

Its bad enough we had to subsidize guppy pay by downbanding 757 and subsidize 767-400 and 787 by downbanding 747 and 777.
pilot64golfer is offline  
Old 10-06-2014, 09:17 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

Instead of trying to reinvent the wheel, I submit that we'd ALL be better of by dusting off the old contracts of the 70's and 80's. Color me Troglodyte

oldmako is offline  
Old 10-06-2014, 11:55 AM
  #50  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
Its not that. Senior people have waited their turn. Now they want to be paid for the senior equipment, not just give it up so more junior pilots can make more money.

Its bad enough we had to subsidize guppy pay by downbanding 757 and subsidize 767-400 and 787 by downbanding 747 and 777.
The lUAL side lost that side of the negotiations, but the lUAL pilots voted for the contract for different reasons. Time to move on.

If the tables were turned, the lCAL guys would have been torqued off.

It is over and done with.

FWIW I am glad Sparky gets the upper pay band. We should end up with a very large fleet of them eventually so I am happy that aircraft gets paid more than it otherwise should. We should all benefit from that decision one day.
Probe is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
steve0617
United
1
10-03-2014 01:28 PM
C-17 Driver
United
47
07-18-2014 07:08 PM
LeeMat
United
214
02-06-2013 07:04 PM
ERJ135
Regional
43
07-21-2008 06:49 PM
DiamondZ
Cargo
26
08-03-2007 01:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices