Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Sparky is coming to 'frisco >

Sparky is coming to 'frisco

Search

Notices

Sparky is coming to 'frisco

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-28-2014, 06:42 PM
  #61  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2012
Posts: 25
Default

The SLI is a simple explanation. If CAL would have gotten over on UAL, the UAL side would have shut down the operation in minutes. If UAL gets over on the CAL guys and gals, they would complain to each other in the crew room for an hour or two and than go fly a 99% on time machine......Does anyone posting in this forum really think that the people arbitrating the SLI did not know this.....Come on people......Come on......Does this not make total sense at all.....
KillmeNow is offline  
Old 05-28-2014, 06:50 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CousinEddie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,085
Default

Originally Posted by KillmeNow
The SLI is a simple explanation. If CAL would have gotten over on UAL, the UAL side would have shut down the operation in minutes. If UAL gets over on the CAL guys and gals, they would complain to each other in the crew room for an hour or two and than go fly a 99% on time machine......Does anyone posting in this forum really think that the people arbitrating the SLI did not know this.....Come on people......Come on......Does this not make total sense at all.....
Shut the operation down through job actions, or should I say, a "deviation" from the "staus quo?" Didn't you know that airlines in this day and age are managed when needed from a court room? Ask APA, UAL-ALPA, and USAPA about it. Good luck. The arbitrators knew about that too. On to the next conspiracy theory.
CousinEddie is offline  
Old 05-28-2014, 06:55 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Gets weekends off
Posts: 1,168
Default

Originally Posted by KillmeNow
The SLI is a simple explanation. If CAL would have gotten over on UAL, the UAL side would have shut down the operation in minutes. If UAL gets over on the CAL guys and gals, they would complain to each other in the crew room for an hour or two and than go fly a 99% on time machine......Does anyone posting in this forum really think that the people arbitrating the SLI did not know this.....Come on people......Come on......Does this not make total sense at all.....
No. It makes no sense. The arbitrators are not ALPA employees. They aren't beholden to ALPA and really don't care if we are ALPA or not. The logic that they made the decision based on giving the UAL side what they wanted is stupid because we didn't get what we wanted. We got less credit for longevity which benefited the CAL side and we got a 787 fence we didn't want also better for the CAL side.

So we didn't get what we wanted.

The 2013 CAL list, which 99% of LCAL guys refer to, was the benchmark the CAL side was throwing the hail Mary pass from, and it was debunked for what it was. The merger happened in 2010. Anything after that should have been shared by both legacy pilot groups. It wasn't.

The conspiracy theory that ALPA national bribed the arbitrators who couldn't care less about what the name of our union is, is just a cover-up to a bad presentation, shoot for the moon, and then trying to cover up the embarrassment of a ridiculous proposal by hiding behind a nonsense argument.
pilot64golfer is offline  
Old 05-28-2014, 07:55 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Default

Originally Posted by pilot64golfer

The conspiracy theory that ALPA national bribed the arbitrators who couldn't care less about what the name of our union is, is just a cover-up to a bad presentation, shoot for the moon, and then trying to cover up the embarrassment of a ridiculous proposal by hiding behind a nonsense argument.
Quite frankly this is the blunt truth that far too many at CAL fail to accept. Law suits are gonna fix the fact that JP was a disaster of a MEC chairman. If you think our side 'lost' you need to point the blame at the dopes that were on JFK boulevard, not ALPA National.
intrepidcv11 is offline  
Old 05-29-2014, 07:30 AM
  #65  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2012
Posts: 25
Default

Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
No. It makes no sense. The arbitrators are not ALPA employees. They aren't beholden to ALPA and really don't care if we are ALPA or not. The logic that they made the decision based on giving the UAL side what they wanted is stupid because we didn't get what we wanted. We got less credit for longevity which benefited the CAL side and we got a 787 fence we didn't want also better for the CAL side.

So we didn't get what we wanted.

The 2013 CAL list, which 99% of LCAL guys refer to, was the benchmark the CAL side was throwing the hail Mary pass from, and it was debunked for what it was. The merger happened in 2010. Anything after that should have been shared by both legacy pilot groups. It wasn't.

The conspiracy theory that ALPA national bribed the arbitrators who couldn't care less about what the name of our union is, is just a cover-up to a bad presentation, shoot for the moon, and then trying to cover up the embarrassment of a ridiculous proposal by hiding behind a nonsense argument.
Anyone who has their hand in the till at the worlds 2nd largest worst airline knew that if you upset the UAL side you shut the till down. You upset the CAL guys they would blame their pathetic non existing Union and themselves and the airline till stays a churning. It really was that easy. And obviously that is what happened. Yes there are a few upset pilots on the UAL side but not even close to how many got hosed on the CAL side. We all get to just muddle along the muddy road for years to come thanks to the greed of curruption......How fun....
KillmeNow is offline  
Old 05-29-2014, 07:37 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
Default

"Anyone who has their hand in the till at the worlds 2nd largest worst airline knew that if you upset the UAL side you shut the till down. You upset the CAL guys they would blame their pathetic non existing Union and themselves and the airline till stays a churning. It really was that easy. And obviously that is what happened. "

What a series of ill-informed and ignorant statements. I would wager this poster is one of the potential 2005 captains.
Regularguy is offline  
Old 05-29-2014, 08:09 AM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Gets weekends off
Posts: 1,168
Default

Originally Posted by KillmeNow
Anyone who has their hand in the till at the worlds 2nd largest worst airline knew that if you upset the UAL side you shut the till down. You upset the CAL guys they would blame their pathetic non existing Union and themselves and the airline till stays a churning. It really was that easy.
Believe what you want. But to me all the "arguments" about how CAL was so great, were only believed by CAL pilots and you guys have fed yourself so much BS that when the light of truth shined on all your arguments, the arbitrators saw it for what it was and made the new seniority list accordingly.

Furloughed UAL pilots were put ahead of active CAL pilots, and apparently the arbitrators felt that a pilot on furlough at United had better career prospects than a junior one working at CAL. You may not like to hear that, but they clearly knew that when they put the list together.

Its easy to say CAL was the greatest airline ever, etc even though it was losing money, living a hand to mouth existence, and getting ready to cease to exist. All words from your CEO.

Or you can say the arbitrators were bribed. Ya...that's it.
pilot64golfer is offline  
Old 05-29-2014, 01:51 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CousinEddie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,085
Default

Originally Posted by KillmeNow
Anyone who has their hand in the till at the worlds 2nd largest worst airline knew that if you upset the UAL side you shut the till down. You upset the CAL guys they would blame their pathetic non existing Union and themselves and the airline till stays a churning. It really was that easy. And obviously that is what happened. Yes there are a few upset pilots on the UAL side but not even close to how many got hosed on the CAL side. We all get to just muddle along the muddy road for years to come thanks to the greed of curruption......How fun....
In two posts you have presented an argument but failed to back it up by utilizing any facts that can be checked and verified. In the real world, people that present their case in the manner in which you do are completely ignored.
CousinEddie is offline  
Old 05-31-2014, 09:04 PM
  #69  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 65
Default

Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
Furloughed UAL pilots were put ahead of active CAL pilots, and apparently the arbitrators felt that a pilot on furlough at United had better career prospects than a junior one working at CAL. You may not like to hear that, but they clearly knew that when they put the list together.
You obviously didn't read the arbitrators ruling. Career expectations of both carriers were considered EQUAL and therefore received no weight. The arbitrators used 65% status and equipment and 35% longevity. It is the greater longevity of the United furloughed pilots that put them ahead of an active CAL pilot. Of course, that is using your longevity in 2010.

For example, a 2007 hire at CAL with 3.5 years longevity and employed was paired with a UAL pilot with 7 years longevity but furloughed. LONGEVITY, LONGEVITY, LONGEVITY, that is the reason the UAL pilots "won."

FYI, by the time the list came out, the CAL guy now has 6.5 years longevity and the furloughed UAL pilot is holding steady at 7 years, still furloughed.
AV82SKI is offline  
Old 06-01-2014, 12:22 AM
  #70  
Nice lookin' tree, there!
 
frozenboxhauler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Tool-Box, old man
Posts: 2,205
Default

Originally Posted by krudawg
Just a small correction; those of us living in the SF Bay area and/or based in San Francisco, refer to San Francisco as "San Francisco". I'm from Los Angeles area originally and used to say "frisco" myself but when you use that word in these parts, most will consider it an improper use of the noun San Francisco. It's like saying "irregardless" which is the improper use of the word "regardless" Who'da thunk it :-0

Oh, and thanks for the information about "Sparky" coming to "frisco"; wherever that is
I love Frisco!! I thought you provincially referred to it as "The City".
fbh
frozenboxhauler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rightseat Ballast
Regional
13
01-16-2010 03:56 PM
Whacker77
Regional
20
08-05-2009 10:01 PM
Herbie
Regional
30
07-05-2009 09:56 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
08-09-2005 01:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices