Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Wall Street Fix UCH Ideas >

Wall Street Fix UCH Ideas

Search

Notices

Wall Street Fix UCH Ideas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2014, 01:23 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
CousinEddie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,085
Default Wall Street Fix UCH Ideas

If things don't turn around soon, it makes you wonder if the next shrink to profitability plan will involve "right sizing" the number of hubs. Down to EWR, ORD, IAH, and SFO perhaps?

What?s Wrong with United Continental? - Stocks To Watch - Barrons.com
CousinEddie is offline  
Old 05-02-2014, 03:31 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Default

Outstanding reply in the comment section. We are all paying the price for Gordon's original 274 RJ plan and Glenn's scope buster deals circa '05-'06.

"MAY 2, 2014 3:23 P.M.
Gene wrote:
I think this analysis might be fundamentally flawed… UAL serves about 370 destinations on-metal, not 471. That includes United and United Express, and not partners like Copa, Lufthansa or ANA.

One major problem is the regional network is dominated by high-cost, 50-seat jets which do not have the same revenue potential as competitor 70-seaters with first class cabins and upsell opportunities in-cabin. A customer looking to purchase a first class ticket in many major markets, like Newark-Atlanta, Chicago-Nashville, or Houston-Kansas City is out of luck on United, or limited to a more restrictive schedule of two-cabin jets. Meanwhile, Delta and AA to a lesser extent offer first class service to virtually the entire network. On the whole, mainline flights also have higher completion percentages and on-time performance. It’s just a small part of the troubles plaguing UAL, but for a company that clearly is not generating sufficient revenue relative to its peers, it’s an important consideration to note that UA simply is not an option for a lot of domestic high-revenue flyers.

If Wolfe is arguing that they should be pulling down those fleets, than I agree, but contrarily, I would argue that UA’s mainline fleet is too small for the existing network."
intrepidcv11 is offline  
Old 05-02-2014, 03:37 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,173
Default

So, we get rid of 757's faster than we get new Guppies. Makes sense to me.
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 05-02-2014, 06:32 PM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 60
Default

As a frequent jumpseater on RJs, this is exactly the problem. Outsourced gate agents who don't give a crap, to cramped 50 seaters that routinely leave with 4 or more open seats for paying passengers, and forget business class, it's worse than steerage class, even to someone who may be connecting to Paris in first class. This is most of our domestic network. Premium airline while minimizing costs, I think that is what we said in the fuel efficiency training. This is premium? I'd hate to see economy.

The 757 vs 737 argument is irrelevant, this is the real battleground, getting the person from Memphis or Atlanta or Wichita to an international or other domestic destination without alienating them, which is exactly what happens on these RJs, and oh yeah, they don't cut costs. Brilliant.
tmac3333 is offline  
Old 05-02-2014, 06:46 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
Default

I read a lot of comments about how bad the rjs are, their gate agents and service. My experience has been actual quite good. I have traveled on united's rjs deadheading, jump seating, purchased tickets and pass riding and my experience has been good. The agents were far more helpful than UALs own, the seats were actually less cramped than my normal 737 middle seat and my bags were delivered right to the airplane door.

Now the bad. They have always been late, no food at all, including buy on board, and the flight attendant (just one) are so frazzled from being over worked they really weren't much help. Did I forget to mention the contortions I have to make to use the lav?

Good product? It has its place and at times I'd rather be in an RJ than the middle seat of a 737 or 757 on a 5 hour flight.
Regularguy is offline  
Old 05-02-2014, 07:02 PM
  #6  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 60
Default

50 seat RJ for a 5 hour flight in economy instead of 737 or 757? If they could air refuel, I don't doubt that Smisek would fly them to Europe to cut costs. 50 seat RJs are not a premium product. I would much rather have my bag in the overhead than wet, or wait for 10 minutes watching angry pax fight each other in the jetway for who can be in front of whom to get their carry on.
tmac3333 is offline  
Old 05-03-2014, 02:51 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by CousinEddie
If things don't turn around soon, it makes you wonder if the next shrink to profitability plan will involve "right sizing" the number of hubs. Down to EWR, ORD, IAH, and SFO perhaps?

What?s Wrong with United Continental? - Stocks To Watch - Barrons.com
I think you are real close on the hub mix except for one. How much pressure will American apply in ORD and what will be our response?

I'm thinking three hubs and 8000 pilots.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 05-03-2014, 06:46 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LivinTheDream28's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 250
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
I think you are real close on the hub mix except for one. How much pressure will American apply in ORD and what will be our response?

I'm thinking three hubs and 8000 pilots.
Guess I better start dusting off the resume. Only i dont have to dust it off because im a new hire. At that rate hopefully ill get recalled somewhere around 2024 so I can be the last guy on the list commuting to reserve in EWR. Awesome
LivinTheDream28 is offline  
Old 05-03-2014, 07:59 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,265
Default

Originally Posted by LivinTheDream28
Guess I better start dusting off the resume. Only i dont have to dust it off because im a new hire. At that rate hopefully ill get recalled somewhere around 2024 so I can be the last guy on the list commuting to reserve in EWR. Awesome
I wouldn't get so dramatic just yet.

Taking back the RJ flying needs to be the number one item on the next contract.
Grumble is offline  
Old 05-03-2014, 08:22 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 737 fo
Posts: 908
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
I wouldn't get so dramatic just yet.

Taking back the RJ flying needs to be the number one item on the next contract.
It has been my number one item on every contract...even when I was at the regional level.
sleeves is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jelloy683
Regional
97
12-23-2007 03:29 PM
BoilerWings
Major
0
12-18-2007 03:10 PM
АЕРОФЛОТ 214
Regional
11
05-18-2007 06:18 AM
RockBottom
Major
4
04-09-2006 05:23 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
06-28-2005 06:59 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices