Profit Sharing Grievance
#191
Guest
Posts: n/a
I don't think that's a threat - is it?
#193
Guest
Posts: n/a
No Syd, I look at what the UAL group lost post 9/11 and it amazes me how you as an individual can't see past what you lost compared to the loses of other pilots in the group. if you are a 777 Captain, you're like all 777/400 Captains who lost some but no where near what the bottom 2-3,000 pilots and many in the middle of the list lost. Was it the pilots fault for not being able to foresee the events and plan accordingly, NO! Was it the poor ALPA leadership? probable when you look at the cast of characters with their hands in the pot(Whiteford, Bathhurst, Wallach, Morris, Heppner). Did management play a role. Most definitely, the airline industry had been shut down for a few weeks when Jim Goodwin got on national TV and stated that if United keep losing money at this rate - we'd be in bankruptcy next year. Didn't take the money people long to realize what could happen if the events carried on any longer and we got "good ol Glenn" to maximum their return while selling off assets and destroying lives. I know that's a lot of BS to you but can you really be that selfish to expect a premium contract given what the MEC was working with. Jeff and the CAL MEC working together against our UAL MEC to ensure the CAL way of live would continue at the expense of the UAL pilots. What was that way of life? Jeff wanting to keep cal work rules, cal MEC trying to stealing Captain seat, seniority, PS, delaying JCBA and the list goes on.
All of that was to say this - in the 4 years leading up to 9/11, I made between 200,000 to 225,000 a year. Afterwards I saw a constant erosion of pay through surpluses, bump, equipment base closures, parked airplanes. Do I feel entitled - NO! - and neither should you. The bottom of the list was hit the hardest, with the middle of the list not far behind. To get any contract that stop the blood bath going on at those senority levels was well worth it. Even though SYD wasn't made whole, you and I have time to make it up and if we don't have time to do that then we can feel good that we did the right thing. Carry On!
All of that was to say this - in the 4 years leading up to 9/11, I made between 200,000 to 225,000 a year. Afterwards I saw a constant erosion of pay through surpluses, bump, equipment base closures, parked airplanes. Do I feel entitled - NO! - and neither should you. The bottom of the list was hit the hardest, with the middle of the list not far behind. To get any contract that stop the blood bath going on at those senority levels was well worth it. Even though SYD wasn't made whole, you and I have time to make it up and if we don't have time to do that then we can feel good that we did the right thing. Carry On!
#194
Grievance has been granted. I hope they pay each LUAL pilot another profit sharing check for that year equal to the original one and we can move forward from this incredibly short-sighted agreement outside the TPA.
Last edited by APC225; 01-27-2015 at 07:00 PM.
#196
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
#198
This grievance:
1) Whether the grievance is timely under Section 17-A of the United Pilots Agreement?
2) Whether UCH violated Letter 05-02, Exhibit C, and Section 3-L-2 of the Agreement by adopting a profit sharing plan for 2011 under which both sub-UA and sub-CO employees (instead of only sub-UA employees) participated?
3. Whether the Company violated Section 3-L-1-k of the labor agreement by failing to supply information requested by ALPA?
Management lost the grievance, but we'll see if it amounts to anything this time.
#200
11 page grievance . . .
Summary which points to us getting nothing:
The Profit Sharing was supposed to be based on the results of UAL NOT the combined entity of UAL and CAL. Therefore the profits from the CAL side should not accrue to UAL pilots. Furthermore, UCH had no restrictions written or otherwise to sharing CAL's profit with CAL pilots.
Not my message, but I think the lawyers win this one again. . .
Summary which points to us getting nothing:
The Profit Sharing was supposed to be based on the results of UAL NOT the combined entity of UAL and CAL. Therefore the profits from the CAL side should not accrue to UAL pilots. Furthermore, UCH had no restrictions written or otherwise to sharing CAL's profit with CAL pilots.
Not my message, but I think the lawyers win this one again. . .
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post