Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Commuter airline hiring woes >

Commuter airline hiring woes

Search

Notices

Commuter airline hiring woes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2014, 05:28 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CousinEddie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,085
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald
Shortages can manifest solutions in funny ways. Be carful what you wish for. A quick and easy solution to the problem, again, would be change the retirement age again. I think we do not need to go there again.

Good point. Has anybody on this forum read the ALPA magazine this month? If the seed that NAS is trying to plant takes root, I doubt there will be any shortage of pilots willing to sign up for a bottom feeder 787 job (well, hey at least I'll get that 787 type)! How is our contract going to look as NAS begins hauling our former customers out of our hubs? Not to mention the Middle Eastern carriers. Cancer can spread very quickly. The RJs sure did.
CousinEddie is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 07:09 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,171
Default

Guppy, guppy.....guppy....it was a Guppy in 1969, and it's still a Guppy, maybe an overstuffed Guppy.
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 08:43 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Posts: 172
Default

Doing away with a mandatory retirement age might be in the works however the increase in physical exam scrutiny would most certainly accompany any such move and we all know what would happen to pilots if they had to take real medical exams. The lack of interest in entering the profession coupled with the new regs is indeed creating the perfect storm for airline management in their continuing effort to reduce pilot compensation and quality of life issues, however one must ask why the WSJ is reporting on this now? Is this the first act in a campaign to get the ball rolling to change the regulations that currently prohibit cabotage and provide airline management cover when they move to go overseas and outsource pilot jobs? Pilots and their labor associations have always been caught flat footed when it come to anticipating the wicked ways of our corporate managers while pilots themselves are still arguing about things that happened decades ago with no concern for what very well may just be the next management move tightening the turn in the professions death spiral. Situational Awareness anyone?
Night Hawk 6 is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 08:48 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
A320's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: 787 Capt.
Posts: 644
Default

Originally Posted by Toddnel
The Bus and the 757 are paying industry average right now. This guppy you speak of is now bigger than your 757's so I'm not sure why you want it to pay so much less, especially seeing as the 757s are all going to the dessert soon. I've never seen a group of people so anxious to take a pay cut when the 757's and 747's leave the fleet just so they can say they made a few bucks more today.

The 737s today are a far cray from the ratted out old guppies United flew in the 80's. Like it or not they will be the majority of the fleet for a long time.
Like it or not, the new Guppy is a PIG compared to any 757 performance wise and is louder and less comfortable on either side of the cockpit door than the Bus.

757-200 up to 255k and 43.5k Thrust
737-900ER up to 187K and 27.3k Thrust

you do the math
A320 is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 08:54 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Originally Posted by A320
Like it or not, the new Guppy is a PIG compared to any 757 performance wise and is louder and less comfortable on either side of the cockpit door than the Bus.

757-200 up to 255k and 43.5k Thrust
737-900ER up to 187K and 27.3k Thrust

you do the math
Yup. The math for me includes a noise reduction headset. Should be standard issue along with a hot mic selection.
APC225 is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 09:47 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: FO
Posts: 424
Default

I don't think there's anyone who wouldn't prefer to fly the 757, but the fact is that the 737 is what's making money and being delivered.
mrmak2 is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 10:11 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HermannGraf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: CR7
Posts: 267
Default

By MICHAEL SCHNEIDER
February 13, 2014
CHICAGO— The regional (or Fee for Departure) segment of the airline industry is comprised of over 25 airlines, operating over 50% of all departures in the USA, and flying into the world’s most complex airspace, and largest (and sometimes smallest) airports, in some of the most challenging weather conditions on the globe.

This means that, at any given time, you are more likely to be flying on a regional airline than the mainline airline through which you’ve purchased your ticket. In fact, it was not until just recently that the airlines were required to tell you the name of the regional airline on which you are actually flying. Most people think that if they buy their ticket through United.com, for example, they will be flying on a United airplane, with United pilots, and United service. Many times, however, this is simply not the case.

You may recall the fatal crash in Buffalo, NY in February of 2009. Yesterday was the 5 year anniversary of this crash. It was Continental Connection flight 3407, operated by Colgan Air. Many friends and family members of those who died in that crash had never heard of Colgan. They were wondering why their loved ones were flying on Colgan when they thought they were flying on Continental. Much attention was focused on fatigue, and flying proficiency (rightly so), but there wasn’t much talk about pilot compensation. At the time of the crash, the First Officer earned about $20k/year. For her flight from Newark to Buffalo, she would have been paid about $30-$40. Total. For the entire flight.

Little has changed up to now unfortunately. Regional airplanes are painted in mainline colors, your flight is coded as a mainline flight, ticket agents, gate agents, and ground workers might all be employees of the mainline. But once you cross the threshold and board that regional jet, or turboprop, you can often hear passengers’ exclamations of how much smaller the airplane is than they’d expected. The trend now, however, is to replace these smaller regional jets with larger, more sophisticated aircraft, carrying many more passengers. Instead of receiving raises, pilots are offered only concessions. Take it or leave it. Leave it, and we’ll place the aircraft at a cheaper airline and shut you down. This is the reality of regional airlines and its dangerous downward spiraling of pilot compensation at a time of record profits, as well as a scarcity of qualified pilots. We believe this is a recipe for disaster waiting to happen.

We are: highly technically skilled, highly trained, highly competent, professional airline pilots operating some of the most complex equipment in and out of the busiest airports and airspace in the world, during all types of meteorological conditions.

But compared to our mainline peers, we are grossly undercompensated.

And chances are, we will be piloting your next flight.
The starting salary at a regional airline for First Officers (Co-Pilots) at one of the largest regional airlines is $23,256/yr. Broken down hourly, that’s a mere $12/hr, based on a 40-hour workweek.

You might hear the media and airline managements proclaim that we make a great hourly wage, but that’s entirely misleading. While away from home more often than at most full-time careers, airline pilots don’t get paid anywhere near 40 hours of pay a week.

Preflighting, flight planning, weather data gathering and interpreting, boarding, deplaning, configuring the cockpit before departure, maintenance delays, weather delays, inbound aircraft arrival delays, “sit” time between flights, and any other time that the door is not closed with the parking brake released is ALL UNPAID.

Imagine only being paid at your job for performing specific tasks, while some of the most important parts of your work go unpaid. That is how airline pilot pay structure is set up.

Let’s do some quick math. Consider this: You’re flying from Chicago to (insert any smaller city within about a 1-2 hour range) let’s say Cleveland, Ohio. You purchased your ticket on AA.com and paid $150 for your one-way flight. You arrive at the airport and head to the American Airlines terminal. You get to your gate, and see AA flight 3575 to CLE will be an hour-long full flight. You board the airplane, and find your seat on the 50-seat Embraer painted in American Eagle colors. You hit some turbulence en route as the pilots navigate around some winter storms. You are confident in your pilots’ ability to get you safely to your destination. As a professional airline pilot, your first officer is more than capable of completing the flight safely. But for his troubles, for this example flight, he will earn exactly $25.84, about $0.50 - yes that is fifty cents - per ticket. From your $150 ticket, a mere half a dollar will have gone to pay your First Officer. Chances are, you tipped your shuttle van driver more than your pilot made from your ticket.

In most industries, one can take their skill-set with them to another company or employer. Skills and experience do not lose value over time. If anything, their value increases.

But not at the airlines. A mainline Captain with 30 years of experience and tens of thousands of flight hours, who leaves for another airline, will make the exact same pay as a new-hire First Officer with the minimum qualifications. If Sully Sullenberger decided to come out of retirement tomorrow and fly for American Airlines, he would earn roughly $39,000 his first year, regardless of his very famous experience.


BUT WHY DO THEY PAY SO LITTLE?

The regional airline industry has experienced tremendous growth, as mainline airlines have essentially outsourced shorter flights to smaller cities to these traditionally entry-level regionals. While this may have worked early on, 9/11 changed everything. Whereas before pilots expected to spend only a few years at the regional level, able to move on quickly to mainline airlines, the post-9/11 industry experienced a period of extreme pilot career stagnation, resulting in an extended era of low wages, and inability to move on to the mainlines.

In short, the regional model is broken. The regionals are unsustainable, and everyone in the industry knows it. But instead of effectively managing their industry by offering competitive wages to attract new-hire pilots to staff the regionals, airline managements have decided to lower labor costs to the point of near-poverty level wages. This has only exacerbated the glooming pilot shortage.

To answer the question though, they pay so little because they can. As was previously mentioned, pilots cannot simply switch airlines if a competitor offers a better future. On the regional level, there are over 25 regional airlines providing passenger feed for the mainlines.

Mainline executives demand regional pilots agree to concessions, or the feed they provide will be awarded to the next lowest bidder, and your airline will be shut down.

This, in combination with the Railway Labor Act’s extreme restrictions on the ability for pilots to strike, has culminated into what we are seeing today: the erosion of the pilot profession, as airline executives realize record profits. We feel that near-poverty level wages has an adverse effect on safety, and that corporate greed will unfortunately be to blame for the next great air disaster.

We want our pilots focused on operating their aircraft, not wondering how they’re going to pay their bills.
HermannGraf is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 10:14 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
Default

Originally Posted by Toddnel
I've never seen a group of people so anxious to take a pay cut when the 757's and 747's leave the fleet just so they can say they made a few bucks more today.
Amazin', ain't it?

Originally Posted by mrmak2
I don't think there's anyone who wouldn't prefer to fly the 757, but the fact is that the 737 is what's making money and being delivered.
Truth!
XHooker is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 10:36 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Yes the Guppy makes money, but what revenue is lost when the Guppy operates on a route previously flown by a 757?
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 12:22 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Default

Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
Why not pay band it with the guppy and get the Airbus and 757 back into mainline wage rates?

That way the little airplanes pay the same and the mainline ones pay more.
As this slowly unwinds into another Guppy sucks thread, I won't to reemphasize the utter STUPIDITY written above. Because you are so blinded by tulip rage, you find it sensible to alter pay negatively for a type with confirmed orders (900 ER/MAX) in order to benefit a stagnant Bus and rapidly shrinking 57 fleet? Yep genius. Howard would love to have you on the NC for the next contract.

Last edited by intrepidcv11; 02-14-2014 at 12:33 PM.
intrepidcv11 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PilotAnalyst
Major
65
10-12-2022 05:31 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Hiring News
2
01-26-2012 09:49 PM
edavis
Hiring News
22
06-29-2011 04:38 PM
stbloc
Hiring News
13
03-09-2011 03:56 PM
fjetter
Career Questions
20
01-10-2011 02:26 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices