Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Cleveland hub closing... >

Cleveland hub closing...

Search

Notices

Cleveland hub closing...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2014, 07:07 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

They'll find new PI's. Most likely the quality of training will fall.

I agree, why move it? It's a cadillac facility that only needs some sprucing up. It's been neglected since Tilton showed up. I remember when they used to tout that the facility turned a profit! Much like the heavy maintenance we used to do for other airlines in IND and SFO. Imagine that.
oldmako is offline  
Old 02-05-2014, 07:42 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,118
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
They'll find new PI's. Most likely the quality of training will fall.

I agree, why move it? It's a cadillac facility that only needs some sprucing up. It's been neglected since Tilton showed up. I remember when they used to tout that the facility turned a profit! Much like the heavy maintenance we used to do for other airlines in IND and SFO. Imagine that.
Well if it makes a profit, that's a very bad thing as that makes it even more sell-able. And it's sellable, management will sell it and use the proceeds to give themselves a bonus.

Ever notice how failing corporations always sell off their most profitable divisions?

Moving the TK doesn't seem smart. There isn't any other hub in the system that isn't in a total ****hole besides DEN.
threeighteen is offline  
Old 02-05-2014, 07:47 AM
  #23  
hopeSales
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by flybynuts
Expect a notification soon and I don't think TK is going to be a winner. The winter storms cost us a lot of money so the announcement will get delayed for a while but I see ORD for all training in about 3-5 years.

Disclaimer...nothing changes in the next 6 months and this holds water.
This is from your position in management? Wouldn't your boys in the Puzzle Place chose IAH for a training center if Wx was the only criteria?
 
Old 02-05-2014, 07:50 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 419
Default

Seems that UCHs deal w Denver that was negotiated while SWA was working the City of Houston has been forgotten:

United lease savings in Denver approved - 5/4/2012 - Flight Global

Seems pretty savvy and in the Denver base that they want badly. Much easier to route pax east and west through Denver than Houston.
ChrisJT6 is offline  
Old 02-05-2014, 01:09 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 880
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
Nothing would surprise me, fbn. But having myself been a commuter to both ORD and DEN, I can tell you there is no comparison. 300+ days of sunshine in DEN makes for an easy commute compared to ugly ORD. Plus, they would be fools to attempt to move that many sims...which probably means they are going to do it.
I totally agree. However the criteria was based on othe factors besides weather. Howard, and others, really like HQ and training center in same place. Delta and AA are like this too for comparison. The Mayor of Denver really wants TK land an would give us discount land by the airport but the decision makers don't seem impressed. The weather of late has hurt our revenue a lot so I expect some big decisions to possibly be delayed for a while. That 2B cost cutting may help actually.

If it was up to me I would have picked SoCal!
flybynuts is offline  
Old 02-05-2014, 01:27 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

SoCal....OK.

I would have picked a hedonism resort somewhere in the Caribbean. The whole time zone thing and all....you know.
oldmako is offline  
Old 02-05-2014, 01:44 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 215
Default

Yeah ... unlike the EWR ground grews that were throwing snowballs and playing in the snow while the customers were wating in the cold jet way for their strollers and bags. what a bunch of losers!
Coach67 is offline  
Old 02-05-2014, 02:35 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

CLEVELAND, Ohio -- United Airlines' decision to drop its hub at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport and eliminate many regional flights leaves the airport with a potentially useless concourse that the city built in the 1990s at the insistence of United’s predecessor, Continental Airlines.

United, which merged with Continental in 2010, is obligated by its lease to continue paying on the outstanding debt for the $110 million Concourse D, the city’s Director of Port Control Ricky Smith said in an interview Tuesday. The airline will pay $1,112,482 per month until 2027, regardless of its flight activity.

The majority of airport debt, except for Concourse D, is paid by passenger facility charges -– a $4.50 fee on each ticket sold, Smith said. He said he is confident that the current debt obligation for the entire airport will be paid off in 15 years, despite the cutbacks by United.

But United’s lease agreement also grants the airline exclusive use of gates on Concourse D –- a facility specifically designed to accommodate the regional jet departures that United announced last week would be reduced by 73 percent in the coming months.

Fifteen years after the airport built the concourse to cater to Continental’s projection that the future of the industry hinged on regional jet service, city officials are uncertain about what to do with the 16-gate facility once it’s virtually vacant.

“Fifteen years ago, the entire industry thought that regional jets were the wave of the future,” Smith said. “We thought that the skies would be littered with those things. The idea that a terminal would be built to accommodate that kind of activity was a reasonable proposition. Now we are victims of change in a dynamic industry. … The future of Concourse D is still to be determined.”
APC225 is offline  
Old 02-05-2014, 02:44 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

$1,112,483 / month X 156 months is 1.735 Billion dollars.

You read that right.

And when they stand in front of you wringing their hands with tears on their cheeks, "our future is in jeopardy, our costs are too high, we can't compete"....you be sure and vote yes. Now grab that hat and get back to work. Think about that the next time you're in the terminal and expensing your missing yet contractually entitled crew meal.

As far as the future of Concourse D, I vote world class bowling extravaganza or perhaps relocating the R&R hall of fame.




Last edited by oldmako; 02-05-2014 at 02:59 PM.
oldmako is offline  
Old 02-05-2014, 02:50 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Originally Posted by CLEVELAND, Ohio
"We thought that the skies would be littered with those things."
They are! They are! Just classic. Majors brought it on themselves. Playing one regional carrier against the other for ever-declining labor costs and now the game's up. Too bad it wasn't a game and it trashed the lives of thousands of pilots and families. Now that the deregulation that started 35 years ago is finally down to three big carriers that everyone predicted and they're making 800-pound gorilla market-based decisions to cut secondary cities out of the market, watch the politicians get all up-in-indignant-arms about cutting out middle America and demand airlines serve them, too. Reregulation!

Last edited by APC225; 02-05-2014 at 03:27 PM.
APC225 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
norskman2
Regional
10
10-22-2011 08:22 AM
DMEarc
Regional
51
09-07-2011 01:41 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
3
11-29-2009 03:20 AM
tflyer70
Corporate
18
12-06-2008 02:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices