Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Flying The Friendly Lies >

Flying The Friendly Lies

Search

Notices

Flying The Friendly Lies

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2013, 08:43 AM
  #11  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Position: next to chronic complainers...
Posts: 364
Default

During my commutes, while in uniform, a "frequent" flyer asks me a questions from time to time: "how do I get un upgrade nowadays, it seems impossible to get into first class on United after merger".
My reply is quite simple; "Sir, if you want an assurance that you'll get a first class, here's a secret - purchase a first class ticket, it always works!"
jetlink is offline  
Old 10-08-2013, 10:24 AM
  #12  
Peace Love Understanding
 
LAX Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Airbus
Posts: 1,040
Default

Originally Posted by jetlink
During my commutes, while in uniform, a "frequent" flyer asks me a questions from time to time: "how do I get un upgrade nowadays, it seems impossible to get into first class on United after merger".
My reply is quite simple; "Sir, if you want an assurance that you'll get a first class, here's a secret - purchase a first class ticket, it always works!"
Lots of people trying to game the system.
LAX Pilot is offline  
Old 10-09-2013, 07:04 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Posts: 172
Default

Originally Posted by Toddnel
It's not just the management that needs to turn the corner but some of us as well. I have listened to many pilots "brag" about their ability to find even the smallest reason to ground an airplane or delay a flight. One even bragged about intentionally wasting printer paper to make a point. I'm not sure what these people are thinking. We should be trying to run the very best operation possible on our end so that the next time contract talks roll around there is actually an ability to make a statement. Its hard to go into a fight saying I know we are running a crappy operation but watch it get crappier.

I just don't see what personal satisfaction these guys get in operating this way.
There will always be those who are never satisfied just as there are those who never find fault with anything. Intentionally trying to sabotage the operation is just like ****ing into the ocean and does nothing except to cause the perpetrator to feel better about himself as he wallows in his misery. These few folks are not as dangerous to the profession or the operation as the aforementioned Pollyanna's who will push to the max, doing whatever it takes to complete the mission. History has shown over and over again it is these "company" men whose desires to keep going have actually resulted in their demise along with their passengers. Remember AA Little Rock? Just one example of a company Pollyanna, and I am certain that there are numerous other examples. While we all do the same work we are all still individuals with our own point of view in a profession that is void of any real leadership.
Night Hawk 6 is offline  
Old 10-09-2013, 07:20 AM
  #14  
Pilot Response
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 479
Default

Originally Posted by Night Hawk 6
There will always be those who are never satisfied just as there are those who never find fault with anything. Intentionally trying to sabotage the operation is just like ****ing into the ocean and does nothing except to cause the perpetrator to feel better about himself as he wallows in his misery. These few folks are not as dangerous to the profession or the operation as the aforementioned Pollyanna's who will push to the max, doing whatever it takes to complete the mission. History has shown over and over again it is these "company" men whose desires to keep going have actually resulted in their demise along with their passengers. Remember AA Little Rock? Just one example of a company Pollyanna, and I am certain that there are numerous other examples. While we all do the same work we are all still individuals with our own point of view in a profession that is void of any real leadership.
Good post, couldn't agree more. While it might be more frustrating to watch and/or work with the "Angry Man" who might push onto A in SFO without an MRD effectively closing 1/3 of the airport. In my opinion, the Marvin who constantly removes fuel covertly and lands at a distant divert field with 2.5 in an A320 is a far greater threat to our collective futures.
NFLUALNFL is offline  
Old 10-09-2013, 07:34 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Toddnel's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: EWR 777 FO
Posts: 378
Default

Originally Posted by NFLUALNFL
Good post, couldn't agree more. While it might be more frustrating to watch and/or work with the "Angry Man" who might push onto A in SFO without an MRD effectively closing 1/3 of the airport. In my opinion, the Marvin who constantly removes fuel covertly and lands at a distant divert field with 2.5 in an A320 is a far greater threat to our collective futures.
Trust me you will find that most sCAL captains are shocked at how light the dispatchers are trying to run our fuel post merger. On the 777 I can't remember a time where we haven't added at least 2,000 lbs to the release. What I'm talking about are the folks who deliberately try to ground aircraft in HGK or PEK for silly things unrelated to safety.
Toddnel is offline  
Old 10-09-2013, 07:42 AM
  #16  
Pilot Response
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 479
Default

Originally Posted by Toddnel
Trust me you will find that most sCAL captains are shocked at how light the dispatchers are trying to run our fuel post merger. On the 777 I can't remember a time where we haven't added at least 2,000 lbs to the release. What I'm talking about are the folks who deliberately try to ground aircraft in HGK or PEK for silly things unrelated to safety.
Understood. I'm just saying that the folks who look for (& usually find) those silly things aren't nearly as dangerous as those types who are trying to save the company single handedly; 800# at a time.
NFLUALNFL is offline  
Old 10-09-2013, 07:49 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by NFLUALNFL
I'm just saying that the folks who look for (& usually find) those silly things aren't nearly as dangerous ...
Not sure I'm following you on this one.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 10-09-2013, 07:49 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Toddnel's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: EWR 777 FO
Posts: 378
Default

Originally Posted by NFLUALNFL
Understood. I'm just saying that the folks who look for (& usually find) those silly things aren't nearly as dangerous as those types who are trying to save the company single handedly; 800# at a time.
True, in my defense I have never come across one at CAL. They will do other stupid things to 'save' the company but even the scabs add gas.
Toddnel is offline  
Old 10-09-2013, 08:10 AM
  #19  
Peace Love Understanding
 
LAX Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Airbus
Posts: 1,040
Default

Originally Posted by Toddnel
Trust me you will find that most sCAL captains are shocked at how light the dispatchers are trying to run our fuel post merger. On the 777 I can't remember a time where we haven't added at least 2,000 lbs to the release. What I'm talking about are the folks who deliberately try to ground aircraft in HGK or PEK for silly things unrelated to safety.
Best fuel briefing I was ever involved in as a pilot. I was the S/O on a 727.

Capt: "I'm adding 2,000 pounds of fuel. Does anyone have any questions?"

F/O: (Who was also a PI and trying to save the company money) "Are you aware that by adding that much gas you are actually going to increase your fuel burn by 500 pounds"?

Capt: "You are right. I'll change it to 2,500 pounds"
LAX Pilot is offline  
Old 10-09-2013, 08:31 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

There's a captain who regularly asked for less fuel than the flight plan called for and got it. FOs objected in various ways (face to face, pro stan, avoid fly with) and captain was counseled by CP. He learned his lesson--he contacted dispatch to lighten fuel load before the flight plan was generated so the FOs wouldn't know that he had asked for less fuel. FOs eventually caught on to this as well and after a divert it may have stopped. It takes all sorts.
APC225 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Hangar Talk
7
02-12-2013 11:21 PM
aa73
Cargo
109
01-28-2012 07:22 PM
dd89
Flight Schools and Training
34
08-23-2009 11:08 AM
Kilgore Trout
Part 135
46
06-19-2009 03:35 AM
DMBinHBurg
Regional
33
11-12-2006 11:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices