Search

Notices

Bumps

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-21-2013, 09:57 AM
  #31  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

Staller/Carolsdanger/JohnHale got banned 3 times in the last 9 months for the same type of $s IAH is posting. For good reason, for sure. I would have banned him sooner.

IAH is the ugly twin brother from another mother.

If I click my heals 3 times, will one of the moderators jump in?
Probe is offline  
Old 10-21-2013, 11:03 AM
  #32  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default

Heels, yes.
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 10-21-2013, 01:37 PM
  #33  
Pilot Response
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 479
Default

Originally Posted by 756IAHFO
I have no idea what this means.....
Q.E.D ...........
NFLUALNFL is offline  
Old 10-21-2013, 06:43 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CousinEddie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,085
Default

Originally Posted by 756IAHFO
It comes down to experience. Most UAL FOs have not been captain on anything in the past 12 years. Most of the CAL pilots have been a captain either at CAL or at a regional within the past 7 years.

Which pilot do you want making captain decisions?? The one sitting around and comfortable in the right seat and is getting old or the young guy that has recent PIC experience.

Ask passengers this question....

We have now gone to a merit based system, finally. In this case I will be chief pilot soon.
Fair enough pal. Then we better be asking the folks if pilots who have returned from long term medical leaves after suffering from an unfortunate condition such as yours (particularly at such a young age) should ever be permitted occupy the left seat. Or any seat for that matter.
CousinEddie is offline  
Old 10-21-2013, 06:58 PM
  #35  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

Does it read something like this?

"25 year old ex-RJ FO who wasn't making enough money, takes a medical "out" so he can get work to get a second income on the side to supplement his LTD. After a new contract, and several years of additional longevity accrued while on LTD, his pay rate is enough that he can come back, pull gear in the right seat of a 756, and make enough money to pay his bills.
Then brags about it all, and his brilliance, on an online forum.
Airmanship - 5.0
Judgement - 1.0
Credibiliy - 0.0

Recommend field promotion to Chief Pilot."
Probe is offline  
Old 10-22-2013, 05:03 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
Does it read something like this?

"25 year old ex-RJ FO who wasn't making enough money, takes a medical "out" so he can get work to get a second income on the side to supplement his LTD. After a new contract, and several years of additional longevity accrued while on LTD, his pay rate is enough that he can come back, pull gear in the right seat of a 756, and make enough money to pay his bills.
Then brags about it all, and his brilliance, on an online forum.
Airmanship - 5.0
Judgement - 1.0
Credibiliy - 0.0

Recommend field promotion to Chief Pilot."
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 10-22-2013, 05:13 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
I don't think in this case there is a big difference between displacement based training events, and vacancy based training. If a bunch of 767 FO's and Capts bump to 737 Capt, which is the airplane that will be replacing their fleet, in their base, that training event is the same.

If a super junior 737 Captain gets bumped, what is he going to be able to bump too? More than likely a 737 FO, which he is probably still qualified to fly with just a PC in the right seat, or maybe just a few more days of training.

When bumps start higher on the food chain, like during a big furlough, the snowball starts at the top. The snowball gets very big, very fast.

In this case, maybe not so much. IMHO.

I am surprised the company is sitting on that many excess 767 pilots getting paid not to fly. Since they all live in Denver anyway, why not sit around getting paid for nada? I would.

Me too. It makes me wonder about LOA 23. Reserve Reset. Page 441 of the UPA. Basically, if we (ALPA) don't meet certain rsv ratios, we have to change the rules or pay a chunk of cash. It wouldn't surprise me if this was their stategy. It makes no sense, as they will lose more than they gain........but.....

Sled
jsled is offline  
Old 10-22-2013, 06:19 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,725
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
Me too. It makes me wonder about LOA 23. Reserve Reset. Page 441 of the UPA. Basically, if we (ALPA) don't meet certain rsv ratios, we have to change the rules or pay a chunk of cash. It wouldn't surprise me if this was their stategy. It makes no sense, as they will lose more than they gain........but.....

Sled
I talked to the CP in Denver a couple of days ago. She seemed to think that bumps surpluses were going to have to come sooner than later. But nothing solid from the company yet.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 10-22-2013, 10:33 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss
I talked to the CP in Denver a couple of days ago. She seemed to think that bumps surpluses were going to have to come sooner than later. But nothing solid from the company yet.
Good to hear Hoss. I like ol' Bebe. She is good people.

Sled
jsled is offline  
Old 10-22-2013, 03:18 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,725
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
Good to hear Hoss. I like ol' Bebe. She is good people.

Sled
Yes she is.Whenever I use the word bump now days I also use the word surplus, they mean the same thing but I had an LCAL guy start to get all froggy on me in ops the other day when he overheard me talking about a bump bid. He thought it meant a flush bid.

LCAL dudes a "bump" bid is the what you'd call a "surplus" bid they are the same thing.
Airhoss is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ERJ135
Hangar Talk
1062
05-25-2015 04:20 PM
MoarAlpha
Safety
10
08-11-2012 09:55 PM
Winged Wheeler
Hangar Talk
42
08-23-2009 03:36 PM
Tantalum
Hangar Talk
2
03-13-2009 11:57 AM
KnightFlyer
Cargo
149
09-04-2006 07:41 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices