Search

Notices

So long..........

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-2013, 08:49 AM
  #31  
Pilot Response
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 479
Default

Originally Posted by JohnHale
Good Point and Post. David Watts is a CAL guys just stirring the UAL pot.
Maybe, but he is correct on this one.
NFLUALNFL is offline  
Old 09-05-2013, 10:06 AM
  #32  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: A320 Driver
Posts: 74
Default

Correction-UAL furloughees hired before April 2000 were integrated with active pilots. As a June 2000 hire, I was stapled below all active pilots, but still offered up as furlough fodder over the LCAL furloughees with whom I was integrated.
mossimo is offline  
Old 09-05-2013, 12:37 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 777 Cap
Posts: 199
Default

Originally Posted by missintheline
Fraternal Brothers,

Through no fault of our own, we've been sidelined for over 10 years. All that time we've been tuning in and following along; the Forgotten, steaming up the windows from the outside looking in, full of what has turned out to be false hope and misplaced surety, confident that our Union of Bretheren were keepin' a weather eye out for us.

Now the decision has been made and we've been left disenfranchised; The Lost Boys of 2000-2001. The ones you neglected to remember when you smashed together these lists and stapled us behind the class of 2008.

It's alright; It's okay. We understand, and, most importantly (to you) it won't affect you and yours in any way.

The lads we'll take it out on is the lads behind us. No chance we'll be giving them any consideration or quarter; Why would we. We weren't given any. When the time comes....and it'll come, don't worry; we'll make selfish, me first decisions based on our own needs with no thought to what our juniors should get or deserve, same as you did. Well Done.

So here's to Fraternity; the lie of the Union; All for One and One for Number One.

See you in hell, Laddies,

The Disenfranchised

p.s. Despite all the setbacks, I'm young enough and healthy enough that I'll spit on all yer graves anyways, ya bastards.
You may not believe this, but the day will come when you will realize what an assine statement you just made.

The difference is, of course, the rest of us realize it now.
flap is offline  
Old 09-05-2013, 01:05 PM
  #34  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Default

Originally Posted by missintheline
Fraternal Brothers,

Through no fault of our own, we've been sidelined for over 10 years. All that time we've been tuning in and following along; the Forgotten, steaming up the windows from the outside looking in, full of what has turned out to be false hope and misplaced surety, confident that our Union of Bretheren were keepin' a weather eye out for us.

Now the decision has been made and we've been left disenfranchised; The Lost Boys of 2000-2001. The ones you neglected to remember when you smashed together these lists and stapled us behind the class of 2008.

It's alright; It's okay. We understand, and, most importantly (to you) it won't affect you and yours in any way.

The lads we'll take it out on is the lads behind us. No chance we'll be giving them any consideration or quarter; Why would we. We weren't given any. When the time comes....and it'll come, don't worry; we'll make selfish, me first decisions based on our own needs with no thought to what our juniors should get or deserve, same as you did. Well Done.

So here's to Fraternity; the lie of the Union; All for One and One for Number One.

See you in hell, Laddies,

The Disenfranchised

p.s. Despite all the setbacks, I'm young enough and healthy enough that I'll spit on all yer graves anyways, ya bastards.
I have a ton of empathy for our twice furloughed brothers and sisters. I'm not sure what you think could have been done differently with regards to your position on the ISL, but I was frankly surprised and impressed with what the LUAL Merger Committee was able to pull off and the arbitrators approved.

That being said, your post is WAY out of line irregardless of the suffering of the past 10 years.
gettinbumped is offline  
Old 09-05-2013, 06:58 PM
  #35  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

I empathize with the double furloughees, but at the same time, they have to accept responsibility for their choices, even if it was just bad luck.

If I were a 2000 or 2001 hire at UAL, and saw all our work rules go away in bankruptcy, I would have never looked back at UAL. We didn't outsource flying right away to RJ's, we outsourced flying to - ourselves. We flew the same number of flights with A LOT fewer pilots.

The more senior furloughees had a brighter outlook.

I have a half a dozen old squadron mates that were hired at UAL in 2000-2001. All are JB , Fedex, UPS, SWA, etc. None are ever coming back to UAL.

I think the arbs were wise in integrating some of the furloughs with active, but not all.

In the end, we take the cards we are dealt, and make our own choices. Choosing to come to UAL for the 3rd time?

I like to think I would have been a faster learner than that.
Probe is offline  
Old 09-05-2013, 07:15 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
aileronjam's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: It keeps changing.
Posts: 207
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
I empathize with the double furloughees, but at the same time, they have to accept responsibility for their choices, even if it was just bad luck.

If I were a 2000 or 2001 hire at UAL, and saw all our work rules go away in bankruptcy, I would have never looked back at UAL. We didn't outsource flying right away to RJ's, we outsourced flying to - ourselves. We flew the same number of flights with A LOT fewer pilots.

The more senior furloughees had a brighter outlook.

I have a half a dozen old squadron mates that were hired at UAL in 2000-2001. All are JB , Fedex, UPS, SWA, etc. None are ever coming back to UAL.

I think the arbs were wise in integrating some of the furloughs with active, but not all.

In the end, we take the cards we are dealt, and make our own choices. Choosing to come to UAL for the 3rd time?

I like to think I would have been a faster learner than that.
Gee, why didn't I think of that... I should've just walked on down to FedEx or SWA and started ground school.

Integrating some of the (2000 hires) furloughed UAL pilots BEHIND some of the furloughed CAL pilots is inexcusable.
aileronjam is offline  
Old 09-05-2013, 08:15 PM
  #37  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

I disagree. The UAL MC spent a lot of negotiating equity into trying to get furloughs integrated in with active pilots. To now complain that you did not get more? They put the rest of their ISL proposal at risk by doing this.

I commend the UAL MC's efforts in this, and the arb's decision.

Your lack of confidence in not being able to land another flying gig is not my fault, or my problem. My old squadron mates didn't seem to have this problem.
Probe is offline  
Old 09-05-2013, 08:17 PM
  #38  
Peace Love Understanding
 
LAX Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Airbus
Posts: 1,040
Default

Originally Posted by aileronjam
Integrating some of the (2000 hires) furloughed UAL pilots BEHIND some of the furloughed CAL pilots is inexcusable.
Tell it to the Arbitrators. They made the decision.

You saw what happened when you ask for too much (ala CAL MC Proposal)
LAX Pilot is offline  
Old 09-05-2013, 08:36 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
aileronjam's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: It keeps changing.
Posts: 207
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
I disagree. The UAL MC spent a lot of negotiating equity into trying to get furloughs integrated in with active pilots.
As they should have.

Originally Posted by Probe
To now complain that you did not get more?

They put the rest of their ISL proposal at risk by doing this.

I commend the UAL MC's efforts in this, and the arb's decision.
I never complained that "I" didn't get more... merely pointing out an inequity in the decision... as have many others on this forum.

I'm certain that the UAL MC and the "arb's" (sic) are gratified to no end that you commend them.

Originally Posted by Probe
Your lack of confidence in not being able to land another flying gig is not my fault, or my problem. My old squadron mates didn't seem to have this problem.
Nowhere did I indicate that it was intended to be "your problem"... you seem a little sensitive.

The point being made was that your flippant remarks about how easy it is finding other suitable employment was out of line. To think that it's as simple as that is an indication that you don't really have much of a clue. That's all... pretty simple really. Maybe you shouldn't take things so personally?
aileronjam is offline  
Old 09-05-2013, 08:41 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
aileronjam's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: It keeps changing.
Posts: 207
Default

Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
Tell it to the Arbitrators. They made the decision.

You saw what happened when you ask for too much (ala CAL MC Proposal)
It's not too much to ask for them to follow the ALPA merger policy. The furloughed CAL pilots had less equity in EACH tenet of the merger policy, so how are they placed above UAL furloughees?

It's really a rhetorical question, I already know the answer. It's over and that's fine... it is what it is.
aileronjam is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Colonel S
United
25
05-04-2022 04:46 AM
Lori Clark
Hangar Talk
1
11-02-2016 06:02 PM
afterburn81
Regional
15
05-29-2008 04:26 PM
Whacker77
Regional
40
05-22-2008 04:36 PM
SkyyDesk
Hiring News
1
04-17-2007 03:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices