Pre-post ISL percentages
#71
Without guessing, I'll ask what part of the process was a disservice. The UAL MEC was at odds throughout this process with the CAL MEC to achieve a reasonable JCBA and SLI. The delays and constant overreaching by the CAL MEC falls on the back of one person, JP.
Last edited by APC225; 09-06-2013 at 07:48 AM.
#72
Here is what I think you will see:
1. 21 days vacation and UAL sick bank restored
2. 6th year pay around $117 till Jan 1st 2014
3. 6th year pay around $128 till late Feb 2014 (new longevity date)
4. 7th year pay around $131 in March 2014
Nobody has clear answers but this is my understanding of it
#73
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
My methodology was to use active pilots in 2010... no furloughs counted on either side. For my present position I used the same pilots I used in 2010 minus retirements. 2010: 54% on CAL list. Today: 61% on combined list (not including the pilots without positions in May of 2010). 2010 projected retirement 8%. Today's projected retirement 12%. Merged in with pilots hired at UAL a year and a half before I went to work at CAL. I suppose they're as ticked off about that as I am about my loss of seniority and retirement percentage. Doesn't two ticked off sides define a "fair" integration?
Very true, Todd! While I'm not happy with the SLI outcome, I don't blame UALALPA or the arbitration board. We (CALALPA) have only ourselves (and Katz' law firm) to blame. Time to move on.
Time to let it all go as fighting will not change a thing. I realize both sides are doing their best to perpetuate the battle (ie. the UA MEC dispute over the 787 fence and the threatened s-CAL pilot lawsuit) but in the end, the list will stand. The sooner everyone vents and gets this out of their system the better we will be moving forward.
#74
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: EWR B737FO
Posts: 225
Time to let it all go as fighting will not change a thing. I realize both sides are doing their best to perpetuate the battle (ie. the UA MEC dispute over the 787 fence and the threatened s-CAL pilot lawsuit) but in the end, the list will stand. The sooner everyone vents and gets this out of their system the better we will be moving forward.
The real enemy is the crappy airline we have become and the true battle is to run the best operation on the planet and to get ready for the next contract.
The real enemy is the crappy airline we have become and the true battle is to run the best operation on the planet and to get ready for the next contract.
#75
Agree with you but let's all, take the sunglasses off... this unity/become one....is a smoke screen. Both sides have used and continue to use this smokescreen.. If unity is so important to our being a strong group, then why is The UA MEC disputing the 787 fence ( this is not individuals) but our soon to be governing body within ALPA. Why is the UA MEC Petitioning the company to make DOH instead of seniority for the jumpseat...to advantage mostly L-UA pilots at the expense of pilot more senior as determined by the awarded arbitration list. I believe both CAL and UAL used seniority to determine jumpseat. Why the change now...If union leaders, can't do what's right for this new group, after the deep scars of the JCBA and ISL battle and now a binding arbitration decision, then there' s no way we will unify and move on...
#76
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 787 Captain
Posts: 1,512
I agree. I can handle the new list "it is what it is" but now the UAL mec is just going for broke. They want it all. If they had it their way cal would just be stapled at the bottom. And they won't stop till they get as close to that as they can. F'em I'm done with that group. Unity... Not going to find it here.
There were many reasonable voices warning the LCAL pilots about the consequences of their scorched earth tactics. It appears the chickens have come home to roost. I'm not advocating retribution, I'm just pointing out human nature. Unlike your pilot group, I'm guessing the LUAL pilots will actively oppose unilateral, damaging acts by our ALPA leaders. It's called principle. It's called unionism.
#77
Holmes how about you read the cal mec statement. Then tell me all about your principle and unionism. As I said. uAL mec f'n wants it all.
Enjoy your new position. You have "earned" it
Frats....yeah right
Enjoy your new position. You have "earned" it
Frats....yeah right
#78
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
It wasn't false growth, nor was it s/l-UAL growth ... It was growth enabled only by s/l-CAL, and never would have happened at L-UAL when it did, never. The arbs gave you part of that equity in the award ... I can live with that. So many UAL guys don't realize it, but this award in soooo many ways, ignores the precedent of past, and sets new ground for the future ... Without the policy change, this award never ever would have looked this way ... go review history ... Rarely have furloughed pilots been placed above active pilots ... Extremely rare in the history of arbitrations ... And the hybrid methodology has never been used ... This will haunt all of us again sometime in the future.
#79
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
I agree. I can handle the new list "it is what it is" but now the UAL mec is just going for broke. They want it all. If they had it their way cal would just be stapled at the bottom. And they won't stop till they get as close to that as they can. F'em I'm done with that group. Unity... Not going to find it here.
That being said, I don't like the maneuvers out if my MEC on the 787 or Jumpseat any more than I liked the precious 3 years from the other side
#80
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
I've read it. And PUH-LEASE. You and I must live on different planets. The list went very close to straight relative seniority for about 11,000 of 12,000 pilots. That's a WIN for LCAL based on overall longevity and number of total pilots and widebodies. I'm .2% different on the final list, and due to the 787 fence (which I hope stands.... See other posts) I'm going to get CRUSHED on the west coast. So I'm not sure how much "enjoying" I'm going to do. But I'm not going to be a baby about it!!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PackTrip
Mergers and Acquisitions
22
12-15-2008 09:48 PM
NetJets_DA2Easy
Fractional
5
07-30-2007 03:23 PM