Search

Notices

Thank you Mr. Katz!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-03-2013, 10:32 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CousinEddie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,085
Default

Originally Posted by ERJ Jay
I was employed, everyone forloughed from UAL was not.

That's pretty much it.

Out of work pilot's being placed before actively working pilots.

Yep, that's fair and equitable.
Let me guess. You built time quickly thanks to the rapid RJ growth and got on with CAL quite young. The furloughed guys that got put in front of you only did so thanks to the considerable time they had already put in in years past. They are therefore a good bit older than you and will be long gone someday and you will have quite a number of years to go. They get some limited career recovery, you still enjoy a long period as a widebody Captain someday. Am I close?
CousinEddie is offline  
Old 09-03-2013, 10:35 PM
  #12  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Everyone seems reasonably upset. That means a pretty well done SLI, I suppose.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 09-03-2013, 10:36 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slats Extend's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 393
Wink

Originally Posted by Skybo
Whoa...hold on a minute pal. You want to start a discussion on how well off UAL was vs CAL? We have just as much pride as you do and had a better operation. UAL now operationally??? IT SUCKS! I am embarrassed to go to work it's that bad. Please tell me why the passengers I fly on CAL metal always say they are thankful it's a CAL plane with CAL employees? You guys may have won the lion share of this battle....you have a long way to go to bring yourselves up to CAL operational standards. Perhaps your attitudes will change with these ill gotten gains. Flail away if you want.
I agree, the operation is a joke. Brought to bear by the CAL managers that took over.

CAL operational standards? That is exactly what is going on today brought to us by the CAL managers that run the place.

Nice swing and a miss.
Slats Extend is offline  
Old 09-03-2013, 10:37 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

I have to hand it to the UAL group. Brain surgeons in strategy. Five years ago you saw this coming and got ALPA to replace "no windfall" with "longevity." Just brilliant. Now a UAL FO on reserve will be bidding into a CA vacancy overnight. Under no windfall this never would have happened. But you've to give credit where credit is due. You took care of your own way before the merger was even announced. Congrats.
APC225 is offline  
Old 09-03-2013, 10:47 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CousinEddie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,085
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
I have to hand it to the UAL group. Brain surgeons in strategy. Five years ago you saw this coming and got ALPA to replace "no windfall" with "longevity." Just brilliant. Now a UAL FO on reserve will be bidding into a CA vacancy overnight. Under no windfall this never would have happened. But you've to give credit where credit is due. You took care of your own way before the merger was even announced. Congrats.
Delaying SLI and locking up over 500 Captain bids. That was a good one too.
CousinEddie is offline  
Old 09-03-2013, 10:58 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
uaav8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: 737 Captain
Posts: 374
Default

It's done.
uaav8r is offline  
Old 09-03-2013, 11:05 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 787 Captain
Posts: 1,512
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
I have to hand it to the UAL group. Brain surgeons in strategy. Five years ago you saw this coming and got ALPA to replace "no windfall" with "longevity." Just brilliant. Now a UAL FO on reserve will be bidding into a CA vacancy overnight. Under no windfall this never would have happened. But you've to give credit where credit is due. You took care of your own way before the merger was even announced. Congrats.
The irony is, well - his name is Jim Brucia. He played a big part in changing merger policy. To complete the irony, he actually argued that the real intent of the change was better communication to members of WHAT the merger policy was in order to reduce erroneous expectations. In actuality, the LCAL merger committee (including Brucia) did EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE. They made a proposal that was nowhere close to the intent of the merger policy, and in doing so actually created unreasonable expectations among the LCAL pilot group. You were not served well.
AxlF16 is offline  
Old 09-03-2013, 11:14 PM
  #18  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

I agree your side was represented in an extremely poor manner. If you read the explanation of the award, it is very damning with regards to the CAL MC proposals. At one point, he used the term "fatally defective".

In the end, what has been accomplished now?

1. JCBA and SLI delayed 3 years. No retro. Every pilot lost 10's of thousands of dollars.

2. Everybody in limbo. The contract ended up being a little substandard, as the UAL side voted yes just to stop the whipsaw. We all lose, again, for 5 years.

3. Company in limbo. Spending millions in training, and now retraining. Less profit sharing for everybody.

4. Bad blood for many, maybe for the rest of the careers caused by unrealistic expectations caused by movement on CAL side, and their moonshot proposal.

5. 10's of millions in merger expenses, to be paid for by all of us. For a result that should have been finished over 2 years ago, to reach the same result.

What a waste of time and money.

Blanket party for JP on his next layover? Since he will be voted out, he is going to have to go fly for a living.
Probe is offline  
Old 09-03-2013, 11:31 PM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 81
Default

Mr. Skybo
I’m not sure of course where you have gained your perspective but it certainly has no depth. In 1978 the airlines were basically told they were to become a “business” overnight. Any and all airlines operating at that time have struggled to accomplish it. You could choose any airline, assign an arbitrary 10 yr period of time (since deregulation) to them and show an operation in trouble. Airlines now had businessmen running them and we have all suffered the embarrassment of that design.
However if you would ever take the time and exert the effort to study the real history of aviation you would find that United Air Lines was more than just an airline; it was actually one of the architects of the airline industry in this country in every sense of the word.
Also just to let you know; regarding the passengers opinion of an airline operation; these are the same people who would eat the left over peanuts in the seat tracks to get a cheaper ticket and drive all the airlines to the level of mediocrity we are today.
Graybeard
Outsider is offline  
Old 09-03-2013, 11:38 PM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: iah 73 fo
Posts: 71
Default

Furloughed pilots ahead of active pilots?? How is that fair??

ohh..let me guess..to rightsize for CAL merger. Right


I truly hope this place burns to the ground and UAL dies like it should have years ago. And yes, i do fly here.
CAL 73 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
A320fumes
United
134
08-25-2013 08:38 PM
Mitch Rapp05
United
525
06-12-2013 11:03 AM
Sandhawk
Major
159
06-30-2009 12:44 PM
nwa757
Regional
23
06-11-2009 06:50 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 09:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices