Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
MEC meetings to discuss the ISL? >

MEC meetings to discuss the ISL?

Search

Notices

MEC meetings to discuss the ISL?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-27-2013, 02:39 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Maybe not Friday.
Ladies and Gentlemen,

We have been granted a hearing on our filing for a TRO for tomorrow at 1430, Tuesday 28 August 2013. We are asking the judge to delay the SLI process for a very brief moment until we can have the hearing for the Declaratory Relief. This ensures that if Bid 14-02 is vacated via Declaratory Judgment, that a violation of our joint Collective Bargaining Agreement will not be used to favor one group of United Pilots over the other. Regardless of the success of the TRO hearing tomorrow, we will be scheduling a "speedy hearing" for Declaratory Relief and that hearing will take place in the very near future.

Respectfully Submitted,

Documents may be viewed at the address below:

https://www.wepay.com/donations/grievance-14-02_1

https://drive.google.com/folderview?...2s&usp=sharing
APC225 is offline  
Old 08-27-2013, 02:52 PM
  #82  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 76
Default

I asked the question with regards to the gum base and bidding monthly schedules. Would the seniority be effective immediately? His response was what I posted to the best of my memory. Perhaps ask a UAL SLI committee member and see what they say. I was just answering a question that was asked to the best of my knowledge. I certainly don't know nor have seen any policy written about sli implementation
Benwarren is offline  
Old 08-27-2013, 02:54 PM
  #83  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 76
Default

Tried to add the quote for which my response was intended but I guess that didn't work. Sorry
Benwarren is offline  
Old 08-27-2013, 03:06 PM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 108
Default

I would very much doubt that most of the L-Ual folks at L-Cal will be bidding their new positions for quite awhile. As much as you might wish it, doing so without a vacancy bid would be a defacto recall to the airline. A recall that would be out of seniority order and that is prohibited by every CBA that I have ever seen. In addition, the pilot(s),who are still on furlough, and senior would certainly have a cause of action against ALPA.
I think that your demand that these guys bid their new positions is way way out in left field.

Although I could be wrong.
sovt is offline  
Old 08-27-2013, 03:11 PM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LCAL dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 138
Default

Originally Posted by Carolsdanger
Cute brain child of the 90's but why didn't they keep the Continental name. Was it due to the regional nature of that airline? Or, could it have been due to the name that destroyed many lives in it short post Lorenzo rule? Could it have been due to the Name recognition that United Airlines has? I could go on but you get the idea. The reason they adapted the paint job was cost and they quarter round logo is a joke to please the peons.

No, Carol, it was because if the United name was 86'd all their debt would have come due. Basically, it's as if in addition to rescuing the survivors the Carpathia changed her name to Titanic.
LCAL dude is offline  
Old 08-27-2013, 03:19 PM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Originally Posted by Carolsdanger
Originally Posted by APC225
Maybe not Friday.
Man, you get ramped-up way too easily. Look on the bright side - it'll give us more time to work on UNITY.
Seems a lot of folks got ramped up.

Aug. 27, 2013

Last week we reported that the CAL and UAL MECs received word from the arbitrators that they are on track to complete the integrated seniority list (ISL), with the possibility of the award being released around the end of this week, at the earliest. Nothing has changed the arbitration panel’s timeline, with the caveat that there can be no guarantees that the ISL will be complete by month’s end.

We have been advised that a request for a temporary restraining order against the release of the ISL has been filed in U.S. District Court. A court hearing has been scheduled in Washington tomorrow to consider the request. At this point, we have no further information on the intentions of the court or whether there will be any potential for impact on the ISL award timing.

ALPA is addressing this issue and the CAL MEC continues with plans to be in session the latter part of this week, in the event that the arbitrators are completed with their task and issue the ISL. We will continue to keep you informed.

CAL MEC Chairman
APC225 is offline  
Old 08-27-2013, 04:11 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
untied's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 521
Default

Originally Posted by picaro
Untied, BOOM! I'll call the explosion squad. Sounds like you'll need it on friday....
Nah....I'll be fine.

It's just a number.

Get ready to be #12,000 buddy!

I'll get some of the walk arounds....don't worry.
untied is offline  
Old 08-27-2013, 04:12 PM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 787 Captain
Posts: 1,512
Default

Originally Posted by sovt
I would very much doubt that most of the L-Ual folks at L-Cal will be bidding their new positions for quite awhile. As much as you might wish it, doing so without a vacancy bid would be a defacto recall to the airline. A recall that would be out of seniority order and that is prohibited by every CBA that I have ever seen. In addition, the pilot(s),who are still on furlough, and senior would certainly have a cause of action against ALPA.
I think that your demand that these guys bid their new positions is way way out in left field.

Although I could be wrong.
There may be some miscommunication....

Let's use the example ofLCAL EWR 737 FO >> assume LUAL pilot Joe Schmuckatelli is bidding #269 based on his current TPA directed seniority. If, as a result of the ISL, First Officer Schmuckatelli is placed senior to 100 of the current EWR 737 FOs that are between #1 and #268, do you contend that he will have to wait for some future bid before exercising his ISL seniority within the EWR 737 FO list? Assume that all of those 269 pilots are trained and currently flying in that BES.
AxlF16 is offline  
Old 08-27-2013, 04:22 PM
  #89  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 33
Default Resignation

Originally Posted by sovt
I would very much doubt that most of the L-Ual folks at L-Cal will be bidding their new positions for quite awhile. As much as you might wish it, doing so without a vacancy bid would be a defacto recall to the airline. A recall that would be out of seniority order and that is prohibited by every CBA that I have ever seen. In addition, the pilot(s),who are still on furlough, and senior would certainly have a cause of action against ALPA.
I think that your demand that these guys bid their new positions is way way out in left field.

Although I could be wrong.
The question that jumps out at me is, why wouldn't all furloughed UA pilots just immediately resign from LCAL? The resulting vacancies would require the company to issue around 500 recall notices.

Gypsy

Last edited by B727gypsy; 08-27-2013 at 04:23 PM. Reason: Grammar
B727gypsy is offline  
Old 08-27-2013, 04:22 PM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cadetdrivr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Default

Originally Posted by jetlink
Forget about safe, reliable, on time service to our customers
Glad you mentioned that and speaking of new and reliable sCAL aircraft, the event below was going on while you were typing.

Karma? Or something about stones and glass houses?
United Airlines' flight from Delhi makes emergency landing in Moscow

Over 260 passengers on an American airline flight from New Delhi to Newark were stranded at an airport here.

MOSCOW: Over 260 passengers on an American airline flight from New Delhi to Newark were stranded at an airport here today after the aircraft made an emergency landing because of a mechanical problem.

The United Airlines' Boeing 777-200 with 267 passengers and 16 crew landed at 3.50 am Moscow time. The malfunction of a central accumulator unit caused the emergency landing, Itar-Tass news agency reported.

The passengers were "fuming" at Domodedovo Airport after being stranded for hours without food or a place to sleep, said a report in The Moscow Times.

No one was injured in the landing and no visible damage was found to the aircraft, reports said.

After disembarking at Domodedovo's international terminal, the passengers were told they would have to wait until 11 pm for the plane to continue its flight to Newark in New Jersey.

The passengers became "frustrated" when the flight crew disappeared and United Airlines did not provide representatives to offer assistance, reports said.
cadetdrivr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 07:59 AM
Redundant Guy
Regional
198
01-28-2013 08:06 AM
jsled
United
7
11-29-2012 12:08 AM
Superdad
Major
19
05-26-2012 07:24 PM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
0
09-24-2005 09:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices