LAX -400 Rumors of Changes
#61
What's a "-400." One must recognize that four hundred means very different things depending which side of the north/south line you come from. I would submit that as of today, the most common perception of -400 is that a 767-400 is being referred to. But in the context of your query, I assume you're talking about the 747-400, which now seems to be known simply as the 747. Big difference. Just wondering if all the respondents are on the same page.
cracks me up listening to guys talk about their "nine hundred max nex gen" and then they go hop in a 1960s guppy
#62
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 737 fo
Posts: 908
Nobody talks about,"Their 900 max next gen" as it is not available to airlines. The Max is only being flown by Boing right now. While the NG's are quite different from the classics, I call all of the 737's a seven three....just like all the other airlines that fly them do.
#63
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 1,049
Nobody talks about,"Their 900 max next gen" as it is not available to airlines. The Max is only being flown by Boing right now. While the NG's are quite different from the classics, I call all of the 737's a seven three....just like all the other airlines that fly them do.
#64
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 153
Nobody talks about,"Their 900 max next gen" as it is not available to airlines. The Max is only being flown by Boing right now. While the NG's are quite different from the classics, I call all of the 737's a seven three....just like all the other airlines that fly them do.
Chairman
#66
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
Wow someone revived a 3 year old thread to slam the writer? Stranger things have happened on the web.
For UAL pilots there was a day when we had the "rope start" and the "400" on the property. Both are variants of the "whale" and represented the biggest airplanes.
At the bottom end we had the "guppy," which came in two variants, "thunder" and "yuppie" (with some of the late sixties pilots calling it "fat Albert" before the Blue Angels named their C-130 that).
Oh and I forgot to mention the "standard," "stretch" and "advanced" versions of the "three holer."
Must be a "millennial" who complained about the precision of a "boomer" while ignoring completely the "X."
Why are some people so sensitive about a 767 of any size? It's just another comfortable, boring, two engine, and automated jet. If we really loved it we'd give it a handle.
For UAL pilots there was a day when we had the "rope start" and the "400" on the property. Both are variants of the "whale" and represented the biggest airplanes.
At the bottom end we had the "guppy," which came in two variants, "thunder" and "yuppie" (with some of the late sixties pilots calling it "fat Albert" before the Blue Angels named their C-130 that).
Oh and I forgot to mention the "standard," "stretch" and "advanced" versions of the "three holer."
Must be a "millennial" who complained about the precision of a "boomer" while ignoring completely the "X."
Why are some people so sensitive about a 767 of any size? It's just another comfortable, boring, two engine, and automated jet. If we really loved it we'd give it a handle.
#67
We did love it at Delta, but not quite as much as the L-1011 TriStar, so the 767 handle was "Bi-Star".
#68
There is a very good reason the 747-400 was referred to as he "400". When we had both the rope start 747-200 and the 747-400 the equipment designator in unimatic was "747" for the rope start and "400" for the 747-400. If you wanted to bid one of the airplanes you had to put either "400" or "747" typed manually into the green screen. Same for looking at pairings in unimatic. Green screen required manual entries and thus a pilot was a "400" person to identify which equipment they were flying. Just like we called the 757/767 "767" because it came on the property first and that was the identifier in unimatic for bidding and looking at pairings.
It was not some great cosnpiracy to evoke superiority. It was just what the programmers used to identify the different fleets and seats.
It was not some great cosnpiracy to evoke superiority. It was just what the programmers used to identify the different fleets and seats.
#69
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 169
There is a very good reason the 747-400 was referred to as he "400". When we had both the rope start 747-200 and the 747-400 the equipment designator in unimatic was "747" for the rope start and "400" for the 747-400. If you wanted to bid one of the airplanes you had to put either "400" or "747" typed manually into the green screen. Same for looking at pairings in unimatic. Green screen required manual entries and thus a pilot was a "400" person to identify which equipment they were flying. Just like we called the 757/767 "767" because it came on the property first and that was the identifier in unimatic for bidding and looking at pairings.
It was not some great cosnpiracy to evoke superiority. It was just what the programmers used to identify the different fleets and seats.
It was not some great cosnpiracy to evoke superiority. It was just what the programmers used to identify the different fleets and seats.
#70
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post