Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
New s-UA 737 Base to Open in November. >

New s-UA 737 Base to Open in November.

Search

Notices

New s-UA 737 Base to Open in November.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-17-2013, 04:13 PM
  #101  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 60
Default

Originally Posted by picaro
LAX, are you seriously trying to imply that our unlimited 70 seat TURBOPROP clause is more detrimental than your 70 seat E-JET/first class, ORD-BIL capable, scope clause is?
More like ORD-GEG capable....
crazy pills is offline  
Old 07-17-2013, 04:20 PM
  #102  
Peace Love Understanding
 
LAX Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Airbus
Posts: 1,040
Default

Originally Posted by picaro
LAX, are you seriously trying to imply that our unlimited 70 seat TURBOPROP clause is more detrimental than your 70 seat E-JET/first class, ORD-BIL capable, scope clause is?
What's the difference between a 78 seat airplane and a 70 seat airplane? Just because one has a jet and the other doesn't its still jobs. Also, management is not going to put a 737 or Airbus on a route that continuously can only fill 50-70 seats. So for academic and practical purposes that's a big hole to fill.

At least we now forced the company to add narrowbody aircraft to mainline tied to block hour flying at express, something that didn't exist at CAL prior.

Additionally, UAL is a much larger airline in terms of scope of flying, etc so our feed is much larger with more than double the international ASMs. So CAL being a smaller primarily domestic airline doesn't need as much feed except at two hubs, IAH and EWR. UAL flew international from LAX, SFO, ORD, IAD, JFK, SEA, and DEN so by nature needed more feed to make that happen.
LAX Pilot is offline  
Old 07-17-2013, 04:26 PM
  #103  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 60
Default

Not gonna adresses the "mostly domestic" comment. Well, yes I will. I think that CAL flew to almost twice as many cities in Europe than UAL did in 2010. Yes I know with 757's.

However, your whole post can sum up our differences. Yes, you had more hubs, but shouldn't we be flying those route as well? Not having them farmed out to someone else?
picaro is offline  
Old 07-17-2013, 04:30 PM
  #104  
Peace Love Understanding
 
LAX Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Airbus
Posts: 1,040
Default

Originally Posted by picaro
Not gonna adresses the "mostly domestic" comment. Well, yes I will. I think that CAL flew to almost twice as many cities in Europe than UAL did in 2010. Yes I know with 757's.

However, your whole post can sum up our differences. Yes, you had more hubs, but shouldn't we be flying those route as well? Not having them farmed out to someone else?
I noticed you picked a metric that favored you. The overall picture is that UALs ASMs were twice as much. PERIOD.
LAX Pilot is offline  
Old 07-17-2013, 04:39 PM
  #105  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 60
Default

While I don't know for sure, but you are probably right. But just because your ASM's are higher does that equal more jobs? Because that is what matters right? 3 747's crossing's vs 6 757's crossing. Probably more ASM's on the 74 outfit.

The guy flying for the 757 outfit has more career advancement opportunities, more progression to Captain, equal or better schedules. All the while only making slightly less than the 747 outfit. Sorry couldn't resist.
picaro is offline  
Old 07-17-2013, 04:51 PM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cadetdrivr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Default

Originally Posted by picaro
The guy flying for the 757 outfit has more career advancement opportunities, more progression to Captain, equal or better schedules.
Ummmm.....sure....but can you share a 757 schedule that works 9 days a month. The CAL 757s typically do 11 to 16 hour legs, right?

I'm guessing this is the real reason why nearly every single 777/747 FO at UAL and CAL can hold narrowbody CA but doesn't. It's all about quality of life not at work.
cadetdrivr is offline  
Old 07-17-2013, 05:23 PM
  #107  
Peace Love Understanding
 
LAX Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Airbus
Posts: 1,040
Default

Originally Posted by larryiah
Sure, but you are paying with those extra days off with your health.
So flying 90 hours a month in a 737 doing redeyes, etc is ok, but flying 78 hours where you get to sleep for 6 hours on the flight is somehow hazardous to your health?

Ya right.....

You know what I'm going to love, all the L-CAL pilots bidding WB slots after SLI. I"ll bet someone tracks the bidding patterns. Making these ridiculous arguments and then after SLI they'll all jump into those seats.

Well if WB was such a terrible thing, why all the fuss when UAL proposed a 747 fence, and then a 787 fence proposed by CAL that included airplanes they didn't even order.
LAX Pilot is offline  
Old 07-17-2013, 07:54 PM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 787 Captain
Posts: 1,512
Default

Originally Posted by larryiah
I don't do redeyes, they are not good for your health. And I like to sleep late too. The "Guppy" allows me to do that.
Well whoop de f'n do...good for you

You DO realize that this isn't all about you right? You DO realize that your experience on the guppy isn't the norm right? You sure picked the wrong job if you're so worried about your health. Lemme guess...you never fly above 29000', you wear a tinfoil hat, and you wear a tinfoil jock strap to protect your raisins from the radar 'back lobe'

In case you didn't realize it -- it's not the guppy that allows you to chose your QOL, it's your SENIORITY.
AxlF16 is offline  
Old 07-17-2013, 08:02 PM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Originally Posted by AxlF16
In case you didn't realize it -- it's not the guppy that allows you to chose your QOL, it's your SENIORITY.
++
..................
APC225 is offline  
Old 07-17-2013, 08:09 PM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 787 Captain
Posts: 1,512
Default

Originally Posted by larryiah
Naw, there's more to it than that. I don't worry too much about ozone or radar emissions; if they havent killed me by now, they probably wont. God told me to stay close to home since this was the main country he looks out for, his fav you know. Plus, why go to all those other countries that don't have the EPA regulating car exhaust and factory emissions, etc. etc.
God must not live near you.
AxlF16 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SEA 737
United
32
03-01-2023 10:39 PM
guppyflyer
United
160
03-12-2012 08:26 PM
Canuckpilot
Regional
3
09-20-2011 05:37 AM
Runaway trim
Regional
83
10-18-2008 05:26 PM
Atwoo155
Cargo
14
08-31-2008 10:10 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices