UAL Pool-ies
10-17-2014, 10:08 AM
#1971
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: IAH 320 CA
Posts: 190
Jeeez.
Should have known better than to post this on here. You guys take everything and twist it to something that was never said.
They did not say they were focusing on the regionals. They did not disparage military pilots. Where are you getting this??
I took it to mean the highest qualified (BY POINT SYSTEM THAT UNITED USES) it's now moving towards the regional pilots..... simply because the highest point getters before were mostly military and they have been called.
It was not slanted towards one or the other.
Should have known better than to post this on here. You guys take everything and twist it to something that was never said.
They did not say they were focusing on the regionals. They did not disparage military pilots. Where are you getting this??
I took it to mean the highest qualified (BY POINT SYSTEM THAT UNITED USES) it's now moving towards the regional pilots..... simply because the highest point getters before were mostly military and they have been called.
It was not slanted towards one or the other.
10-17-2014, 10:22 AM
#1973
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 737
Posts: 1,061
Jeeez.
Should have known better than to post this on here. You guys take everything and twist it to something that was never said.
They did not say they were focusing on the regionals. They did not disparage military pilots. Where are you getting this??
I took it to mean the highest qualified (BY POINT SYSTEM THAT UNITED USES) it's now moving towards the regional pilots..... simply because the highest point getters before were mostly military and they have been called.
It was not slanted towards one or the other.
Should have known better than to post this on here. You guys take everything and twist it to something that was never said.
They did not say they were focusing on the regionals. They did not disparage military pilots. Where are you getting this??
I took it to mean the highest qualified (BY POINT SYSTEM THAT UNITED USES) it's now moving towards the regional pilots..... simply because the highest point getters before were mostly military and they have been called.
It was not slanted towards one or the other.
Last edited by Hilltopper89; 10-17-2014 at 10:35 AM.
10-17-2014, 10:30 AM
#1974
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,012
This seems reasonable to me. But I might use 4- or 5-1 for the fighter community where every 1.3 in the logbook can represent one takeoff, one approach, one landing, a brief, a debrief and 90-100% handflying.
10-17-2014, 11:06 AM
#1975
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 880
The process understands all backgrounds and what are "norms." There is no specials and everyone gets the rank and file according to their background, experience, conferences and etc...this does understand EVERYONE'S skills and talents.
10-17-2014, 04:42 PM
#1976
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 303
10-22-2014, 05:39 PM
#1978
Guppy Half-Wing FO
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: 737 Right Seat
Posts: 142
Gouge: Heard that they will be calling Nov 3/4th for the December 2nd class date. Someone who interviewed with me on the same day was offered the Nov 11 class.
Last edited by VQ2 Spanky; 10-22-2014 at 05:56 PM.
10-23-2014, 12:02 PM
#1979
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 76
10-23-2014, 12:16 PM
#1980
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 76
Every active civilian CFI meets this criteria too. Fighter dudes have a lot more on their plate than these few things to justify the extra 0.3. But really, I believe the 0.3 is not because our work in the military is more complex (although it may be for many of us), it is because mil uses air time in the logbook, and civilians use engine time. The extra .3/sortie is to account for this discrepancy, nothing else.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EngineOut
Regional
153
05-10-2017 10:12 AM
