Originally Posted by Staller

You sure like getting worked over ......That's ok - he'll probably repeat himself-

Originally Posted by DontPickIt

Sorry gentlemen, DMC is one of my experiments. I had a platoon of monkies I genetically engineered into strike breaking pilots back in 83. Even for me, the experiment went hog wild wrong after a gang of them went after my wife, mistresses and myself during 727 flight engineer school in my basement... they did some unmentionable things. I've had DMC on ice in my secret lair hoping for ideas on what to do with him for almost 20 years when the power went out after my beloved Enron flopped and he's been on the lamb ever since. He's assumed some fake implanted memories from the 80's - at least he's not on the Charlie's Angel's rants anymore, those were tiring. He's moved onto a self loathing identity of a commuter pilot who was hired in 2000, as you've all been forced to endure in the above post. So in any regard... a 29 year old GMO monkey with 4 stripes and a stiffie has been on the loose ever since. I think we have him cornered, he's assumed yet another fake identity and has a penchant for advocating in front of mediation boards as of late. But he's doing so well, I hate to interrupt. Just maybe, he will become the fever dream of 1983 after all.

Originally Posted by ChrisJT6

You may not have said snapshot but you sure did mention you want to be at your relative seniority as of now...not when the snapshot was taken.

Originally Posted by Jim Lively

It isn't going to really make any difference if they use the snapshot from 2010 or now. Each side has had quite a few retirements and your relative position will end up the same. I'm sure the arbitrators can figure out who is still on the property and who has retired.

Originally Posted by jumppilot

Originally Posted by Probe

For a while I thought Staller and DMC were the same person under different names. They both post like 12 year old trolls. But different 12 year old trolls. Perhaps butt buddies, hoping to get into Riddle some day when they grow into the ability to grow hair in their nether regions? Do pre-Riddle wannabes suffer from ISL wet dreams?

Originally Posted by larryiah

Still have some sort of man attraction to Pierce?

Originally Posted by Staller

I've always had one message and that is pierce was working with the company and doing things to improve his lot over the rank and file pilot. You can turn it into anything you want but if you go back and re-read any of my post they were targeted at the tone and method of pierce's actions as they occurred. If you take the time you'll find I've been proven right by both the UAL and cal side of the forum and court rulings.
Now you closet trolls can get in your circle and select a pivot to lead - you will never see me or many of the UAL pilots there - it's a cal and cal wannabe thing. And why do cal pilots from IAH have their name imprinted on the back of their belts - so pierce and Jeff can see who **** *** *******

Originally Posted by LAX Pilot

Longevity, Status and Category, Career Expectations.

That's what it is. Its those 3 things. Its in writing. Lots of witnesses, including the person that wrote the policy, testified why those are in there.

UAL's side used those three things. CAL's side said "Captains with Captains" then went 1 for 1, integrating 737 Capts with 747 Capts, then a bunch of CAL FOs with UAL Captains, then all the UAL widebody FO's with CAL 737 FOs, then stapeled the rest stating it was "overstaffing"

Right......

Originally Posted by sleeves

It is NOT just those 3 things. YOU are not following current ALPA merger policy when you advocate such things. Merger policy clearly states "Not limited to". That means other things can be considered besides those 3 things.