Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Guess the date of the ISL Decision. >

Guess the date of the ISL Decision.

Search

Notices

Guess the date of the ISL Decision.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-2013, 08:48 AM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: 737 Cap
Posts: 451
Default

Originally Posted by larryiah
It's the arrogance showing. These are some very bitter individuals. Apparently you had to fit a certain mold to work there. If you didn't fit that mold and were turned down, you "must have a personality flaw." Well, if not being an arrogant ass is a personality flaw, I can deal with that. I'm just thanking The Lord that he trained the UAL interview Captain ( I forget his name but he looked a lot like Norm Gustitis, maybe half an inch taller) to spot my personality flaw. That flaw has probably netted me a mil. more over the last 10.
This is the kind of post that doesn't need to happen. It adds nothing to the discussion and creates disunity. I understand the need to throw punches from time to time (I know I have), but labeling the entire UAL group as arrogant asses is not better than others from the UAL side saying the CAL side is a bunch of SCABS. It just simply isn't true. Have your personal war with whoever you want, but please don't label "everyone" anything. Just a waste of time and accomplishes nothing.

That said, I haven't done my part in calling out anyone to this point - CAL or UAL. It does seem unfair that I'd call out you. I just don't understand making all of this crap personal. Neither airline was failing. Each brought parts of their business model that clearly make sense to leverage. When a pilot from either side makes enormous generalizations (as in attacks to a whole pilot group) or states that either company was going out of business or that we saved the other side, you've basically taken yourself out of having a real discussion about anything logically. We're better than this garbage bickering about nonsense generalizations and character defamation.

Scott
Scott Stoops is offline  
Old 06-26-2013, 09:28 AM
  #112  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 29
Default

Kind of interesting to see what I have been hired into......kind of making me nervous too. I sure hope this animosity dies in August or whenever the SLI is finalized. Glad my availability for training is not until Oct when I pray this madness is over with. Otherwise....I guess mil leave is always an option.
ExE3toUAL is offline  
Old 06-26-2013, 09:30 AM
  #113  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 536
Default

Originally Posted by larryiah
Pierce and Baron are not gaming anything. They are just not rolling over and allowing their guys to get boned. Like the pay banding issue. Seniority grab averted, but it took some aggressive discourse. The UAL side would have been happy to bone us with that one. The thing is that their arrogance would have prevented them from seeing our side of the argument. There is only one way to deal with that.

Larry - That's the mentality we see from your side more often than not. The UAL MEC extended an olive branch and your leadership immediately started trying to wack them with it. I agree there is only one way to deal with this attitude. pierce and the cal MEC did more harm for unity than the company ever could. Why didn't you control your LEC's and mc - it was your responsibility?
Staller is offline  
Old 06-26-2013, 09:34 AM
  #114  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 536
Default

Originally Posted by ExE3toUAL
Kind of interesting to see what I have been hired into......kind of making me nervous too. I sure hope this animosity dies in August or whenever the SLI is finalized. Glad my availability for training is not until Oct when I pray this madness is over with. Otherwise....I guess mil leave is always an option.
MIL leave is a good option and I would keep my DAL application current. This is not going to end anytime soon. Could go on for a career -

Last edited by Staller; 06-26-2013 at 10:01 AM.
Staller is offline  
Old 06-26-2013, 09:40 AM
  #115  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 536
Default

Originally Posted by larryiah
The olive branch? Give an example.
The best was probably treating the cal MEC with respect. It didn't take long for your boys to go public against the UAL guys with the training issues Fred imposed. Barron's insistence on "pay banding" trying to rig SLI in JCBA grab. It goes on................... But you know all this - right? Don't rehash when you know the answer.
Staller is offline  
Old 06-26-2013, 09:42 AM
  #116  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: A-320 CA
Posts: 36
Default

Originally Posted by ExE3toUAL
Kind of interesting to see what I have been hired into......kind of making me nervous too. I sure hope this animosity dies in August or whenever the SLI is finalized. Glad my availability for training is not until Oct when I pray this madness is over with. Otherwise....I guess mil leave is always an option.
Welcome Aboard! Call your Rep and get the real skinny. The information/opinions expressed on this board is so far removed from reality that, if I were a new-hire, I'd actually consider canceling membership for 6 months or so, as to enjoy your new career. If you get based in IAH, be sure to give me a call.

Frats,

Ben
412/716-8208
Ben Salley is offline  
Old 06-26-2013, 09:44 AM
  #117  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 536
Default

Heavy hitters showing up - blood letting?

Ben is a good guy but keep in mind he is a cal LEC rep and just about everything he says will have a cal bias.
Staller is offline  
Old 06-26-2013, 09:48 AM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: 737 Cap
Posts: 451
Default

Originally Posted by larryiah
Pierce and Baron are not gaming anything. They are just not rolling over and allowing their guys to get boned. Like the pay banding issue. Seniority grab averted, but it took some aggressive discourse. The UAL side would have been happy to bone us with that one. The thing is that their arrogance would have prevented them from seeing our side of the argument. There is only one way to deal with that.
IMHO, they've gamed everything. That is Pierce's MO. Always has been. He is a political creature that will sell his and your soul for a couple of pieces of silver. Go ahead, hitch your wagon to that horse.

You can't possibly be typing that with a straight face, right?

Come on Larry. Your side actually proposed to staple the bottom 2500 UAL pilots despite the fact that we have 3 times as many widebodies - 52 777's, 25 747's, more 767's and twice as many widebody orders as either growth or replacements. We're the one's grabbing seniority? Have you looked at the NWA/DAL agreement? How about ALPA merger policy? Familiar with any of the transcripts of the arbitration?

Scott
Scott Stoops is offline  
Old 06-26-2013, 10:01 AM
  #119  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: A-320 CA
Posts: 36
Default

Originally Posted by Staller
Heavy hitters showing up - blood letting?

Ben is a good guy but keep in mind he is a cal LEC rep and just about everything he says will have a cal bias.
Thanks Staller...I think.

The new-hires have no dog in this fight, but they will in the next. At 43, I highly doubt this will be my last merger. The new guys will be a very valuable asset to US in that next endeavor. We should leave them out of the fight, which is pretty much over, and encourage them to take very unemotional notes to be referenced in the future. They sit on the jumpseat and have a vantage point that I envy right now. They're observations will be very valuable, as will the un-jaded Uhire's, come the next fight.

Frats,

Ben
Ben Salley is offline  
Old 06-26-2013, 10:40 AM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
Default

"The COMPANY violated it's contract with sUAL."

While this statement sounds kind of weird it does fit into my opinion of UAL management post merger. I believe (there's appears to also be evidence) they, Management, felt one of the options was to operate TWO subsidiaries and eventually eliminate one of them. They played up to the JP and hard balled Wendy and JH, which in in my opinion shows where they were headed.

The giving of the contractually illegal $40 mill. was part of their play.

Looking forward to seeing how this will be resolved in the award.
Regularguy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kc135driver
United
56
11-16-2012 11:18 AM
Galway
Cargo
2
03-19-2012 02:07 PM
1st overnite
Cargo
10
01-30-2012 08:06 PM
DR Pilot
United
77
10-25-2011 05:48 PM
APC225
United
25
09-29-2011 11:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices