Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
L-United Furlough Number >

L-United Furlough Number

Search

Notices

L-United Furlough Number

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2013, 03:13 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
13n144e's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: 787 CA
Posts: 425
Default

Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
Just to be clear, the pilots flying on the L-CAL side are recalled to United. That flying growth is United flying. Just because the company decided to add the flying back to that side of the equation (because it was cheaper mainly) doesn't mean they weren't recalled.
You really do live in your own little world, don't you?

Last edited by 13n144e; 06-02-2013 at 03:51 PM.
13n144e is offline  
Old 06-02-2013, 03:20 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Posts: 222
Default

Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
They aren't on the L-UAL side, but they are recalled, and flying for United.....
Dude,

Not sure what rock you are living under, but there are many flying over on the LCAL side that have NOT been recalled.
tkhayes90 is offline  
Old 06-02-2013, 03:48 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WarEagle28's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 185
Default

Originally Posted by tkhayes90
Dude,

Not sure what rock you are living under, but there are many flying over on the LCAL side that have NOT been recalled.
Exactly, what I was looking for, thanks tk
WarEagle28 is offline  
Old 06-02-2013, 04:01 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

I always thought recall was only to LUAL side. Flying for CAL is the same as flying for DAL, AMR etc.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 06-02-2013, 05:18 PM
  #15  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
Just to be clear, the pilots flying on the L-CAL side are recalled to United. That flying growth is United flying. Just because the company decided to add the flying back to that side of the equation (because it was cheaper mainly) doesn't mean they weren't recalled.
For the visual folks, just an illustration of your sentiments.

SoCalGuy is offline  
Old 06-02-2013, 05:45 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
NavyCal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: B737 FO
Posts: 42
Default

Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
Just to be clear, the pilots flying on the L-CAL side are recalled to United. That flying growth is United flying. Just because the company decided to add the flying back to that side of the equation (because it was cheaper mainly) doesn't mean they weren't recalled.

I find it odd that many CAL pilots want to claim flying for an express carrier as longevity for mainline, and at the same time deny United pilots who are flying for United that same right.
From the Transition and Process Agreement:

7-B. Job Opportunities.
(i) If either Continental or United intends to hire new Pilots, it will first offer
employment to fill such positions in seniority order to Pilots on furlough from the
other Airline. Acceptance or rejection of such an offer or failure to qualify will
not affect a Pilot’s recall rights or placement on the Integrated Seniority List
(which shall be based upon his seniority position at the Pilot’s originating
Airline).

If the "employment offer" doesn't affect a pilot's recall rights, how can it consitute a recall in itself?
NavyCal is offline  
Old 06-02-2013, 06:53 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 880
Default

Originally Posted by SoCalGuy
For the visual folks, just an illustration of your sentiments.

That's classic!
flybynuts is offline  
Old 06-03-2013, 03:58 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 137
Default

Can't wait for the actual decision to come out from the arb board, that way crazy theories like this will die the death they deserve...

How can a contractually agreed upon furlough protection agreement with a flow down to a subsidiary airline be likened to a merger of two completely opposite airlines with no existing agreement minus the TPA which clearly states the job opportunity and in no way gives credence to longevity. CAL extended an olive branch of employment to those on furlough, nothing more...you retain your recall rights at legacy united and that airline only...sorry, can't have it both ways
vspeed is offline  
Old 06-03-2013, 04:45 AM
  #19  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 536
Default

Originally Posted by vspeed
Can't wait for the actual decision to come out from the arb board, that way crazy theories like this will die the death they deserve...

How can a contractually agreed upon furlough protection agreement with a flow down to a subsidiary airline be likened to a merger of two completely opposite airlines with no existing agreement minus the TPA which clearly states the job opportunity and in no way gives credence to longevity. CAL extended an olive branch of employment to those on furlough, nothing more...you retain your recall rights at legacy united and that airline only...sorry, can't have it both ways
When the TPA was agreed to both airlines had guys on furlough - This was a 2 way street to protect both pilot groups. So you know what you can do with the olive branch comment -----
You guys need to sleep more and quit coming up with this stuff - a UAL guy working at cal cannot improve his senority position relative to other UAL guys and cal's regional guys can't improve their senority relative to the regular cal guys.
This argument is due to the cal guys trying to stuff the top of the list with manufactured dates for the RJ guys, like pierce an company. Thus avoiding UAL guys with more actual senority from being placed in front of them on the combined list. You are right about one thing - you can't have it both ways.
Believe it or not the Furloughed United guys have the same recall rights at the New United that they had at the old United - Sorry!
Staller is offline  
Old 06-03-2013, 04:59 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 137
Default

Originally Posted by Staller
When the TPA was agreed to both airlines had guys on furlough - This was a 2 way street to protect both pilot groups. So you know what you can do with the olive branch comment -----
You guys need to sleep more and quit coming up with this stuff - a UAL guy working at cal cannot improve his senority position relative to other UAL guys and cal's regional guys can't improve their senority relative to the regular cal guys.
This argument is due to the cal guys trying to stuff the top of the list with manufactured dates for the RJ guys, like pierce an company. Thus avoiding UAL guys with more actual senority from being placed in front of them on the combined list. You are right about one thing - you can't have it both ways.
Believe it or not the Furloughed United guys have the same recall rights at the New United that they had at the old United - Sorry!
so full of wrong, just not even worth commenting on.. enjoy your career...
vspeed is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
Gordon C
Air Wisconsin
10
06-11-2020 03:16 PM
APC225
United
92
12-22-2012 04:29 AM
ualratt
United
0
11-21-2011 09:01 AM
Freight Dog
Money Talk
20
11-08-2011 01:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices