LAX 756 now in BES
01-15-2013, 06:27 AM
#12
Fore!
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 756 F/O
Posts: 505
Most don't. I find it a necessary progression by UCH. Since sUAL parked all their guppies to get the merger done, now they have to get them back in the sUAL domiciles to optimize the flying. 3,2,1 attack.....
01-15-2013, 07:56 AM
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: B777
Posts: 586
I have to agree it would be kinda "crappy" to open another S-CAL base in an S-UAL domicile. We are "one company" now and SLI done soon. (6-9 more months more likely) I could make out like a bandit and bid the 756 in LAX but is that really fair to my UAL brothers (and sisters...it is UAL after all)
Why not get SLI done first then bid, bid, bid, away!!!
Why not get SLI done first then bid, bid, bid, away!!!
01-15-2013, 08:48 AM
#14
Peace Love Understanding
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Airbus
Posts: 1,040
The UAL pilots have already established lives in the UAL bases so why move to NY or IAH to fly something we can fly already? The pilots who bid theses bases were mostly Texas commuters looking for an easier commute.
01-15-2013, 09:23 AM
#15
Banned
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: IAH 737 CA
Posts: 690
Shhhhhhhhhh. Don't tell anyone. That way after they are done parking all of the UAL nanobuses, we can do our next merger in 2 years with AMR since they have a huge order. I can't get my eyes to roll back in my head far enough.
01-15-2013, 09:27 AM
#16
Banned
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: IAH 737 CA
Posts: 690
I have to agree it would be kinda "crappy" to open another S-CAL base in an S-UAL domicile. We are "one company" now and SLI done soon. (6-9 more months more likely) I could make out like a bandit and bid the 756 in LAX but is that really fair to my UAL brothers (and sisters...it is UAL after all)
Why not get SLI done first then bid, bid, bid, away!!!
Why not get SLI done first then bid, bid, bid, away!!!
Why did "we" vote in this contract with no provisions for base and aircraft protections? We did "we" vote to give UAL pilots a larger retro check? Why did "we" vote to screw up the best trip trading system in the industry? None of this is fair either but there it is. We have moved past that; I see us moving past this as well.
01-15-2013, 09:43 AM
#17
Keep Calm Chive ON
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
The L-CAL pilots have already established lives in the former L-CAL bases (LAX/DEN), so why move to Southern CA or DEN to fly something we can fly already...especially when some have already "established" there (years ago) in "former" operated L-CAL bases prior to their closing? The pilots who bid theses bases were mostly Calif & DEN commuters looking for an easier commute.
Last edited by SoCalGuy; 01-15-2013 at 09:56 AM.
01-15-2013, 10:38 AM
#18
Peace Love Understanding
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Airbus
Posts: 1,040
^^^In those words^^^, it can also be construed as such.......
The L-CAL pilots have already established lives in the former L-CAL bases (LAX/DEN), so why move to Southern CA or DEN to fly something we can fly already...especially when some have already "established" there (years ago) in "former" operated L-CAL bases prior to their closing? The pilots who bid theses bases were mostly Calif & DEN commuters looking for an easier commute.
The L-CAL pilots have already established lives in the former L-CAL bases (LAX/DEN), so why move to Southern CA or DEN to fly something we can fly already...especially when some have already "established" there (years ago) in "former" operated L-CAL bases prior to their closing? The pilots who bid theses bases were mostly Calif & DEN commuters looking for an easier commute.
01-15-2013, 10:47 AM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Have you noticed the Continental hangar in DEN halfway down 16L?
Last edited by SpecialTracking; 01-15-2013 at 11:31 AM. Reason: 4 hrs O sleep
01-15-2013, 11:03 AM
#20
Fore!
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 756 F/O
Posts: 505
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
